Skip to main content

Fixpoint semantics for partial computed answer substitutions and call patterns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algebraic and Logic Programming (ALP 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 632))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we study a declarative (fixpoint) semantics for logic programs which correctly models several kinds of partial answers and call patterns. We first show how the Ω-semantics [5,4] can model these observables when the selection rule is not taken into account. We then define a suitable immediate consequence operator, and hence a fixpoint semantics, for partial answers and call patterns which considers also the selection rule. Each observable induces an observational equivalence on programs. The semantics are then related to the observational equivalences by investigating correctness and full abstraction properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. R. Apt. Introduction to Logic Programming. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics. Elsevier, Amsterdam and The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. R. Apt and M.H. van Emden. Contributions to the theory of logic programming. Journal of the ACM, 29(3):841–862, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Barbuti, R. Giacobazzi, and G. Levi. A General Framework for Semantics-based Bottom-up Abstract Interpretation of Logic Programs. Technical Report TR 12/91, Dipartimento di Informatica., Università. di Pisa, 1991. To appear in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bossi, M. Gabbrielli, G. Levi, and M, C. Meo. Contributions to the Semantics of Open Logic Programs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems 1992, 1992. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bossi and M. Menegus. Una Semantica Composizionale per Programmi Logici Aperti. In P. Asirelli, editor, Proc. Sixth Italian Conference on Logic Programming, pages 95–109, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Codish, D. Dams, and E. Yardeni. Bottom-up Abstract Interpretation of Logic Programs. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, 1990. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Eder. Properties of substitutions and unifications. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 1:31–46, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Falaschi and G. Levi. Finite failures and partial computations in concurrent logic languages. Theoretical Computer Science, 75:45–66, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Falaschi, G. Levi, M. Martelli, and C. Palamidessi. A new Declarative Semantics for Logic Languages. In R. A. Kowalski and K. A. Bowen, editors, Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. on Logic Programming, pages 993–1005. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Falaschi, G. Levi, M. Martelli, and C. Palamidessi. Declarative Modeling of the Operational Behavior of Logic Languages. Theoretical Computer Science, 69(3):289–318, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Gabbrielli, G. Levi, and M. C. Meo. Observable Behaviors and Equivalences of Logic Programs. Research Report IIAS-RR-92-9E, International Institute for Advanced Study of Social Information Science, FUJITSU LAB. Ltd., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Jaffar and J.-L. Lassez. Constraint Logic Programming. In Proc. Fourteenth Annual ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 111–119. ACM, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.-L. Lassez, M. J. Maher, and K. Marriott. Unification Revisited. In J. Minker, editor, Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pages 587–625. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, Ca., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. W. Lloyd. Foundations of Logic Programming. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987. Second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Palamidessi. Algebraic properties of idempotent substitutions. In M. S. Paterson, editor, Proc. of the 17th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 443 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 386–399. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. H. van Emden and R. A. Kowalski. The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. Journal of the ACM, 23(4):733–742, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Vieille. Recursive query processing: the power of logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 69:1–53, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hélène Kirchner Giorgio Levi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gabbrielli, M., Meo, M.C. (1992). Fixpoint semantics for partial computed answer substitutions and call patterns. In: Kirchner, H., Levi, G. (eds) Algebraic and Logic Programming. ALP 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013821

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013821

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55873-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47302-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics