Skip to main content

Ray-representation formalism for geometric computations on protein solid models

  • Submitted Contributions
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applied Computational Geometry Towards Geometric Engineering (WACG 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1148))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ray-representation or ray-rep formalism provides a comprehensive and simple approach for geometric computations on molecular solid models. These methods allow model formulation in terms of simple constructive solid geometry. In particular, the van der Waals exclusion volume is described by computing the ray-representation of a union of spheres and the solvent exclusion volume is computed by Minkowski dilation and erosion. Volume and area properties are calculated, respectively, by a ”pile-of-bricks” and ”collocation-of-tiles” interpretation of the rayrep. Labeling the chemical character of surface patches is facilitated by the intrinsic point ordering of the ray-rep. Definition of internal cavities can be accomplished by equivalence-set clustering of internal void segments. Finally, a Boolean intersection procedure determines placement of crystallographic waters with respect to the protein solvent excluded volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. M. Richards. Folded and unfolded proteins: An introduction. In Thomas E. Creighton, editor, Protein Folding, pages 1–58. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. Finney. Volume occupation, environment and accessibility in proteins, the problem of the protein surface. J. Mol. Biol., 96:721–732, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cyrus Chothia. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 105:1–14, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Frommel. The apolar surface area of amino acids and its empirical correlation with hydrophobic free energy. J. Theor. Biol., 111:247–260, 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Eisenberg and A. D. McLachlan. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature, 319:199–203, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Irwin D. Kuntz. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science, 257:1078–1082, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. G. Requicha. Mathematical models of solid objects. Technical Report Technical Memorandum 28, Production Automation Project, University of Rochester, Available from CPA/COMEPP, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7501, November 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. G. Requicha and R. B. Tilove. Mathematical foundations of constructive solid geometry: general topology of closed regular sets. Technical Report Technical Memorandum 27, Production Automation Project, University of Rochester, Available from CPA/COMEPP, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7501, June 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. P. Menon, R. J. Marisa, and J. Zagajac. More powerful solid modeling through ray representations. Technical Report CPA92-4, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7501, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. P. Menon and H. B. Voelcker. Mathematical foundations: set theoretic properties of ray representations and minkowski operations on solids. Technical Report CPA92-9, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7501, January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Ellis, Gershon Kedem, Richard Marisa, Jai Menon, and Herbert Voelcker. Breaking barriers in solid modeling. Mechanical Engineering, pages 28–34, February 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. S. Head, G. Kedem, and M. G. Prisant. Application of the ray representation and a massively parallel special purpose computer to problems of protein structure and function: I. Methodology for calculation of molecular contact surface, volume and internal free space. Technical Report CS-1994-31, Department of Computer Science, Duke University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrence R. Dodd and Doros N. Theodorou. Analytical treatment of the volume and surface area of molecules formed by an arbitrary collection of unequal spheres intersected by planes. Mol. Phys., 72(6):1313–1345, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frederic M. Richards. Areas, volumes, packing, and protein structure. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 6:151–176, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michael L. Connolly. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science, 221(4612):709–713, August 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Michael L. Connolly. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 16:548–558, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michael L. Connolly. The molecular surface package. J. Mol. Graphics, 11:139–141, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Juan Luis Pascual-Ahuir and Estanislao Silla. GEPOL: An improved description of molecular surface. I. building the spherical surface set. J. Comp. Chem., 11(9):1047–1060, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Heiden, T. Goetze, and J. Brickmann. Fast generation of molecular surfaces from 3D data fields with an enhanced ”marching cube” algorithm. J. Comp. Chem., 14(2):246–250, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michel Sanner, Arthur J. Olson, and Jean Claude Spehner. Fast and robust computation of molecular surfaces. In Proc. 11th ACM Symp. Comp. Geom, C6-C7. ACM, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Edelsbrunner and E. Mucke. Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 13(1):43–72, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amitabh Varshney, Frederick P. Brooks Jr., and William V. Wright. Linearly scalable computation of smooth molecular surfaces. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(5):19–25, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. J. A. Heijmans and C. Ronse. The algebraic basis of mathematical morphology: I. dilations and erosions. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 50:245–295, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jean-Paul Serra. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Benoit E. Mandelbroit. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dietrich Stauffer and Amnon Aharony. Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Hoshen and R. Kopelman. Percolation and cluster distribution. I. cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Phys. Rev. B., 14(8):3438–3435, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Varadarajan and F. M. Richards. Crystallographic structures of ribonuclease s variants with nonpolar substitution at position 13: Packing and cavities. Biochemistry, 31:12315–12327, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ming C. Lin Dinesh Manocha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prisant, M.G. (1996). Ray-representation formalism for geometric computations on protein solid models. In: Lin, M.C., Manocha, D. (eds) Applied Computational Geometry Towards Geometric Engineering. WACG 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0014487

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0014487

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61785-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70680-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics