Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Intelligence in Services and Networks

IS&N 1995: Bringing Telecommunication Services to the People — IS&N '95 pp 119–131Cite as

Counting the costs and benefits of metaphor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 144 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 998))

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that the use of suitable metaphors in the user service interface can have a dramatic effect on the way in which the user perceives the services, depending on the category of metaphor chosen. An earlier paper by the authors postulated that interactional metaphors might lead to greater long term usage of services, as they direct the user to thinking about what the services are for, rather than thinking about the services themselves. To test this hypothesis, a model of usage was built, showing the likely impact of using different types of metaphor. The model showed that usage levels over time varied according to metaphor category. These usage patterns were then imposed on existing techno-economic models from specific industry sectors. Interactional metaphors led to the highest long term usage in most industry sectors, although the construction industry showed higher usage with spatial metaphors. In all sectors, inappropriate choice of metaphor would be sufficient to destroy the economic advanatages of advanced communications services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, B; Smyth M; Knott, R.P; Bergan, J; Bergan, M. & Alty, J.L. “Minimising Conceptual Baggage: Making Choices about Metaphor”, proc HCI'94, Cambridge University Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Condon, Chris “Networked Cooperative Work: Usability Issues of MILAN”, proc Telematics '90, BIBA, Bremen, Germany, 3–5 Dec 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Condon, Chris, “Multimedia & CSCW in Manufacturing: Working with MILAN” proc Conferencia ESPRIT: CIME & Competividad Empressarial, Bilbao, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Condon, Chris & Keuneke, Stephan “Metaphors and Layers of Signification: The Consequences for Advanced User Service Interfaces” in “Towards a Pan-European Telecommunications Service Infrastructure — IS&N 94”, ed H-J Kugler, A Mullery, N Niebert. Springer-Verlag. 1994. pp 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duin, Heiko & Kiessling. Silvia “CRIMP for Windows 3.1 User Manual”, BIBA, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duin, H. “Object-Oriented Scenario Management for Simulation Models” To be presented on: IMACS European Simulation Meeting on Simulation Tools and Applications, 28–30 August, 1995, Gyor, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eurostat, “Enterprises in Europe”, Second Report, Commission of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon, T. J., Hayward, H. “Initial Experiments with the Cross Impact Matrix Method of Forecasting”, Futures, December 1968, S. 100–116

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hämmäinen, Heikki “Form-based Approach to Distributed Co-operative Work” PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Helsinki University of Technology, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hämmäinen, Heikki & Condon, Chris “Form and Room: Metaphors for Groupware”, proc COCS '91, ACM Conference on Organizational Computer Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, 5–8 Nov 1991

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helmer, O. “Problems in Futures Research: Delphi and Causal Cross-Impact Analysis”, Futures, February 1977, S. 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchins, E. “Metaphors for Interface Design” in Taylor, M.M. Neél, F. & Bouwhuis, D.G. (eds) “The Structure of Multimodal Dialogues, Elsevier: North Holand. 1989. pp11–28

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchinson, Chris & Rosenberg, Duska “Cooperation and Conflict in Knowledge-Intensive Computer Supported Cooperative Work” in “CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict?” Springer-Verlag, London 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kane, J. “A Primer for a New Cross-Impact Language — KSIM”, Technological Forecasting and Social Changes 4, 1972, S. 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krauth, J., Hamacher, B., Duin, H. “A Set of Tools for Rough Enterprise Modelling”, Proc CISS (First Joint Conference of Simulation Societies), 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laurel, Brenda “Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character” in B. Laurel (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design Addison-Wesley 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sinnigen, Marita; Cools, Jan-Pieter & Sampera, Jaume “URSA Deliverable 5” RACE Project R2091, 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bremer Institut für Betriebstechnik und angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft, Brunel Univrersity Centre for Research in Information Environments, Deutschland

    Chris Condon & Stephan Keuneke

Authors
  1. Chris Condon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Keuneke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Anne Clarke Mario Campolargo Nikos Karatzas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Condon, C., Keuneke, S. (1995). Counting the costs and benefits of metaphor. In: Clarke, A., Campolargo, M., Karatzas, N. (eds) Bringing Telecommunication Services to the People — IS&N '95. IS&N 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 998. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016961

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016961

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60479-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47618-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation