Skip to main content

A comprehensive process model for discussing and recording scientific papers

Putting process modelling into software process education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Process Technology (EWSPT 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 635))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Efficient and effective reading of scientific papers is an important and challenging task. We have addressed it by applying principles and techniques from software process engineering, developing a comprehensive paper process model which we have enacted, improved and validated over the past one and a half years at weekly discussion sessions. The model captures paper selection, paper discussion, and the recording and retrieval of the discussion results. The focus of this paper lies on the paper discussion process which describes the systematic and detailed classification, analysis, and evaluation of research papers, provides guidance throughout the course of the group discussions, and guarantees that all relevant information of the discussions is retained in an annotated bibliography database. Our experience shows that students obtain a deep domain understanding, are trained in systematically assessing scientific papers and research results, and acquire invaluable hands-on experience with a sample process model.

This material is partly based upon work which author carried out as an adjunct professor at McGill University.

Author's names are listed alphabetically; authors contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Victor R. Basili and H. Dieter Rombach. The TAME project: Towards improvement oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(6):759–773, June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mary Elwart-Keys, David Halonen, Marjorie Horton, Robert Kass, and Paul Scott. User interface requirements for face to face groupware. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 295–301, Seattle, April 1990. Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Victor Harnack, Thorrel B. Fest, and Barbara Schindler Jones. Group Discussion: Theory and Technique. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Harrison and C. Cook. Insights on improving the maintenance process through software measurement. In Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance — 1990, pages 37–45, San Diego, CA, November 1990. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rudolf K. Keller and Nazim H. Madhavji. Process engineering support for studying scientific papers. Technical Report ProM-92-1, School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leslie Lamport. Latex, a document preparation system. Addison-Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nazim. H. Madhavji. The process cycle. Software Engineering Journal, 6(5):234–242, September 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nazim H. Madhavji and Wilhelm Schaefer. Prism — methodology and process-oriented environment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(12):1270–1283, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mark H. Nodine. WordRef User's Guide, version 1.4. Brown University, February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leon J. Osterweil. Automated support for the enactment of rigorously described software processes. In Proc. 4th International Software Process Workshop, pages 122–125, Moretonhampstead, UK, May 1988. ACM/Sigsoft and IEEE-TCSE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chris Wild, Jinghuan Dong, Kurt Maly, and Guorong Hu. A process model for decision based software development. In Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance — 1991, pages 42–51, Sorrento, Italy, October 1991. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Winkler and S. Kamins. Hypertalk 2.0: The Book. Bantam Books, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Claude Derniame

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Keller, R.K., Madhavji, N.H. (1992). A comprehensive process model for discussing and recording scientific papers. In: Derniame, JC. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 635. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017527

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017527

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55928-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47310-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics