Skip to main content

Using description logics for knowledge intensive case-based reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1168))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we argue that description logics with their object-oriented representation based on a declarative semantics and their powerful inferences are a good base for building similarity-based systems. But in existing description logic systems it is not possible to formulate and use knowledge about concrete domains (e.g. data types like numbers, strings, sets of symbols). Based on Baader and Hanschke's theoretical work on “admissible concrete domains” we realized Ctl, an extensible description logic system that is able to integrate such concrete domains via a generic interface to existing implementations of such data types. Initially, we coupled a CLP(R)-system in order to realize sound and complete inferences over systems of linear inequalities. This concrete domain is especially useful within the area of second-level corporate support, a domain whose requirements initiated our investigations on description logics and which we will use for our illustrating examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. D. Ashley and V. Aleven. A logical Representation for Relevance Criteria. In K.-D. Althoff S. Weß and M. M. Richter, editors, Topics in Case-Based Reasoning, pages 338–352, 1994, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader, H. Bürckert, B. Hollunder, A. Laux, and W. Nutt. Terminologische Logiken. KI, (3):23–33, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and P. Hanschke. A Scheme for Integrating Concrete Domains into Concept Languages. Research Report RR-91-10, DFKI, Kaiserslautern, Germany, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Brachman and J. G. Schmolze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ralph Bergmann, Wolfgang Wilke, Ivo Vollrath, and Stefan Weß. Integrating General Knowledge with Object-Oriented Case Representation and Reasoning. In Proc. 4th GWCBR, pages 120–127, Berlin, Germany, 1996. Humboldt Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ashok Goel. Integrating Model-Based-Reasoning and Case-Based Reasoning for Design Problem Solving. In Proc. AAAI-88, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hanschke. A Declarative Integration of Terminological, Constraint-Based, Data-driven, and Goal-directed Reasoning. Dissertation, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO. ISO 10303 Part 105: Kinematics. ISO, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerd Kamp. AMS — A Case-Based Service Support System. In R. V. Rodriguez F. D. Anger and M. Ali, editors, Proc. of the IEA/AIE94, pages 677–683, Austin, TX, 1994. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerd Kamp. Integrating Semantic Structure and Technical Documentation in Case-Based Service Support Systems. In K.-D. Althoff S. Weß and M. M. Richter, editors, Topics in Case-Based Reasoning, pages 392–403, 1994. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jana Koehler. An Application of Terminological Logics to Case-based Reasoning. In Proc. KR94, Bonn, Germany, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerd Kamp and Holger Wache. CTL — a description logic with expressive concrete domains. Technical report, LKI, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.N. Madhusudan. A Bond graph based approach to Case-based synthesis. CMU-RI-TR-95-29, Carnegie Mellon University, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frank Puppe. Einführung in Expertensysteme. Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gerd Pews and Stefan Wess. Combining Case-Based and Model-Based Approaches for Diagnostic Applications in Technical Domains. In Proc. EWCBR'93, pages 325–328, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Reuleaux. The Kinematics of machinery — outlines of a theory of machines. Macmillan & Co, New York, NY, 1876.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michael M. Richter. The Knowledge Contained in Similarity Measures. Invited Talk ICCBR95, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katia Sycara, D. Navin Chandra, and S. Narasimhan. A transformational approach to case-based synthesis. AI EDAM, 5(1), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stefan Weß. Fallbasiertes Problemlösen in wissensbasierten Systemen zur Entscheidungsunterstützung und Diagnostik. PhD thesis, Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany, January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stefan Weß. Intelligente Systeme für den Customer-Support. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 38(1):23–31, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Volker Weispfenning. Applying Quantifier Elimination to Problems in Simulation and Qptimization. Technical Report MIP-9607, Universität Passau, Passau, Germany, April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ian Smith Boi Faltings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kamp, G. (1996). Using description logics for knowledge intensive case-based reasoning. In: Smith, I., Faltings, B. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1168. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020612

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020612

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61955-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49568-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics