Skip to main content

Bi-directional probabilistic assessment

  • Reasoning and Decision Support
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems (IEA/AIE 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 604))

  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

Conditioning has been shown to be one approach for improving subjective probabilistic assessments of a target uncertainty [5]. In practice, conditioning on only one distinction is often employed in an attempt to improve the quality of the assessment while minimizing the level of effort for constructing a distribution for the target uncertainty. Once the actual assessment begins it is not uncommon that the expert realizes that much of his knowledge and beliefs are represented best in the reverse conditioning order. By assessing both conditional orderings (bi-directional assessment) and subsequently “balancing” the two perspectives while reducing assessment errors, a better representation of the expert's knowledge and beliefs is constructed than by a conventional, uni-directional or direct assessment. After the expert has attempted to reduce the assessment errors, total reconciliation of the distributions can be achieved through nonlinear programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B.W. Hagen: Constructing Discrete Marginal Distributions Via Redundant Probabilistic Assessment. PhD dissertation, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B.W. Hagen: “MCPAS: A System for the Acquisition of Knowledge & Beliefs as Subjective Probabilities,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems, Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii, June 2–5, pp. 702–711, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky: Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Pearl: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, Ca., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.V. Ravinder, D.N. Kleinmuntz, and J.S. Dyer: “The Reliability of Subjective Probabilities Obtained through Decomposition,” Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 186–199, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Fevzi Belli Franz Josef Radermacher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hagen, B.W. (1992). Bi-directional probabilistic assessment. In: Belli, F., Radermacher, F.J. (eds) Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems. IEA/AIE 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 604. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025010

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025010

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55601-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47251-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics