Skip to main content

Updating uncertain information

  • 1. Mathematical Theory Of Evidence
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases (IPMU 1990)

Abstract

In this paper, it is considered the concept of conditioning for a family of possible probability distributions. First, the most used definitions are reviewed, in particular, Dempster conditioning, and upper-lower probabilities conditioning. It is shown that the former has a tendency to be too informative, and the last, by the contrary, too uninformative. Another definitions are also considered, as weak and strong conditioning. After, a new concept of conditional information is introduced. It is based on lower-upper probabilities definition, but introduces an estimation of the true probability distribution, by a method analogous to statistical maximum likelihood.

Finally, it is deduced a Bayes formula in which there is no ’a prior’ information. This formula is used to combine informations from different sources and its behavior is compared with Dempster formula of combining informations. It is shown that our approach is compatible with operations with fuzzy sets.

This research was supported by the European Economic Community under Project DRUMS (ESPRIT B.R.A. 3085)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campos L.M. de,Lamata M.T.,Moral S.(1989) The concept of conditional fuzzy measure. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 5, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster A.P. (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. 38, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois D., Prade H. (1986) On the unicity of Dempster rule of combination. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 1, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fagin R., Halpern J.Y. (1989) Updating beliefs vs. combining beliefs. Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lamata M.T., Moral S.(1989) Classification of fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 33, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearl J. (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan & Kaufman (San Mateo).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl J. (1989) Reasoning with belief functions: a critical assessment. Tech. Rep. R-136. University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Planchet B. (1989) Credibility and Conditioning. Journal of Theoretical Probability 2, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer G. (1976) A Theory of Statistical Evidence. In: Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol. II (Harper, Hooker, eds.) 365–436.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smets Ph. (1978) Un modele mathematico-statistique simulant le procesus du diagnostic medical. Doctoral Dissertation, Universite Libre de Bruxelles. Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smets Ph., Kennes (1989) The transferable belief model: comparison with bayesian models. Technical Report, IRIDIA-89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Ronald R. Yager Lotfi A. Zadeh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moral, S., De Campos, L.M. (1991). Updating uncertain information. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases. IPMU 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028149

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028149

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47580-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics