Skip to main content

Probabilistic default reasoning

  • 2. Probabilistic Methods
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 150 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 521))

Abstract

We present an algorithm that is able to integrate uncertain probability statements of different default levels. In case of conflict between statements of different levels the statements of the lower levels are ignored. The approach is applicable to inference networks of arbitrary structure including loops and cycles. The simulated annealing algorithm may be used to derive a distribution which best fits to the different statements according to the maximum likelihood principle. In contrast to Pearl's approach to probabilistic default reasoning based on probabilities arbitrarily close to 1 our approach may combine conflicting evidence yielding a compromise between statements of the same default level according to their relative reliability. Between observationally equivalent solutions the maximum entropy criterion is employed to select a distribution with minimal higher order interactions.

This work is part of the joint project TASSO “Technical Assistance with a System for SOlving unclear problems using inexact knowledge” and was supported by the German Federal Department of Research and Technology, grant ITW8900A7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarts, E., Korst, J. (1988): Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G. (1989): Preferred Subtheories: An Extended Logical Framework for Default Reasoning, Proc. IJCAI '89, p.1043–1048

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, M.H.A., Vinter, R.B. (1985): Stochastic Modelling and Control. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grosof, B. (1988): Non-Monotonicity in Probabilistic Reasoning. In: J.F. Lemmer, L.N. Kanal (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.237–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Junker, U. (1989): A correct Non-Monotonic ATMS, Proc. IJCAI '89, p.1049–1054

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindley, D.V. (1985): Reconciliation of Discrete Probability Distributions, in Bernardo, J.M., DeGroot, M.H., Lindley, D.V., Smith, A.F.M (eds.) Bayesian Statistics II, pp. 375–390, North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd, E. (ed.) (1984): Handbook of Applicable Mathematics. Vol. VI: Statistics. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nilsson, N. (1986): Probabilistic Logic, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28, p. 71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paass, G. (1988): Probabilistic Logic. In: Smets, P., A. Mamdani, D. Dubois, H. Prade (eds.) Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning, Academic press, London, p.213–252

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paass, G. (1988): Stochastic Generation of a Synthetic Sample from Marginal Information. Working-paper 308, GMD, St.Augustin, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paass, G. (1990): Probabilistic Reasoning and Probabilistic Neural Networks. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paass, G. (1989): Second order Probabilities for Uncertain and Conflicting Evidence. Proc. 6-th Conference on Uncertainty in AI. Cambridge, Mass. July 1990

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J. (1988): Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Ronald R. Yager Lotfi A. Zadeh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paass, G. (1991). Probabilistic default reasoning. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases. IPMU 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028151

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028151

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47580-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics