Abstract
A theoretical framework is proposed, in which possibilistic logic can be uniformly used to treat uncertainty associated with production rules, when knowledge is represented in either logic or frames. This model is being implemented in the uncertainty module of a tool designed to allow the construction of expert system shells.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buchanan B.G., Shortliffe E.H., Rule-Based Expert Systems, the MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristics Programming Project. Addison Wesley, 1984.
Bobrow D.G., Winograd T., “An Overview of KRL, A Knowledge Representation Language”. Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–46, 1977.
Laurent J.-P., Thome F., Ayel J., Ziebelin D., “KEE, Knowledge Craft et Art: Evaluation comparative de trois outils de développement de systèmes experts”. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 25–53, 1987.
Bittencourt G. “A Hybrid System Architecture and its Unified Semantics”. In Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (Z.W. Ras, ed); North-Holland, pp. 150–157, Charlotte, NC, 1989.
Calmet J.; Tjandra O.; Bittencourt G. “MANTRA: A Shell for Hybrid Knowledge Representation”. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Tools for Artif. Intel., San José, Ca, 1991.
Brownston L., Farrel R., Kanr E., Martin N., Programming Expert Systems in OPS-5, An Introduction to Rule-Based Programming. Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma, 1985.
Buchanan B.G., Feigenbaum E.A., “DENDRAL and Meta-DENDRAL: Their Applications Dimension”. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 11, No. 1–2, pp. 5–24, 1978.
Van Melle W., Shortliffe E.H., Buchanan B.G., “EMYCIN A Domain Independent System that Aids in Constructing Knowledge-Based Consultation Programs”. In State of the Art Report on Machine Intelligence, New York, Pergamon, Infotech, 1981.
Bittencourt G., Marengoni M., “A Customizable Tool for the Generation of Production-Based Systems”. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, pp. 337–352, Toulouse, France, 1993.
Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H., Possibilistic Logic. Report IRIT/91-98/R, IRIT, Toulouse, France, 1991.
Minsky M., “A Framework to Represent Knowledge”. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, (P. Winston, ed), McGraw-Hill, pp. 211–277, 1975.
Quillian, M.R., “Semantic Memory”. In Semantic Information Processing, (M.L. Minsky, ed), pp. 216–270, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Ma, 1968.
Dubois D., Prade H. (with the collaboration of H. Farreny, R. Martin-Clouaire, C. Testemale), Possibility Theory — An Approach to the Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press, 1988.
Davis R., King J., “An Overview of Production Systems”. Machine Intelligence, vol 8, pp. 300–332, 1977.
Silva, F. de A.T.F. da, “A Hybrid Formalism for Representation and Interpretation of Image Knowledge”. Proc. Int. Soc. for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Congress, Washington, DC, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bittencourt, G., Marengoni, M., Sandri, S. (1993). The use of possibilistic logic PL1 in a customizable tool for the generation of production-rule based systems. In: Clarke, M., Kruse, R., Moral, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028179
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028179
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57395-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48130-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive