Skip to main content

Computer-controlled noninvasive patient positioning in fractionated radiotherapy — A videogrammetric system for automatic patient setup, fast detection of patient motion and online correction of target point misalignment during therapy

  • Basic Tools and Applications in Radiotherapy
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CVRMed-MRCAS'97 (CVRMed 1997, MRCAS 1997)

Abstract

Purpose An integrated videogrammetry based system for high precision fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck region has been developed. Patient setup is performed automatically and patient motion during treatment is detected and compensated. Methods and Materials The system consists of two video cameras controlled by a personal computer, a landmark system with a device for dento-maxillary fixation (DMF) and a computer-controlled motorized tabletop. Individually shaped, the dento-maxillary fixation fits the patient's teeth of the upper jaw. The optical measurement system is calibrated relative to the isocenter of the therapy unit. Position and spatial orientation of the landmarks are monitored by the cameras and processed for the real-time calculation of a target point's actual position relative to its initial position. Calculated translational misalignments are compensated online by countermovements of a 3D computer-controlled tabletop. Rotational deviations cannot be corrected automatically, but non-isocentric rotations are separeted into isocentric rotations and translations, which are online corrected. Thus the planned target point remains in the isocenter. Results System inaccuracies due to algorithm, calibration, illumination dependence, scale factors for image formation, have been determined in phantom studies. Algorithm and calibration errors are smaller than 0.2 %. Illumination dependence is uncritical for the infrared emitting diodes (IRED) used. Spectrally adapted bandpass filters eliminate interferences, caused by other light sources. The DMF repositioning accuracy has been derived from clinical studies on 11 patients to be 0.280±0.140 mm (mean±std. dev.). Spatial resolution of the optical measurement system is 5 μm for translational and 20 μrad for rotational deviations with a sampling frequency of 15–20 Hz. The maximum speed of the tabletop is 25 mm per second, the spatial resolution is about 10 μm with a default residual motion stop of 50 μm for translational deviations with respect to the initial targetpoint position. In summary, the overall positioning accuracy of the complete system was determined to be 0.6 mm. Conclusion For stereotacically guided radiotherapy in head and neck region the developed patient positioning sensor unit (PPSU) combines the high positioning accuracy, known from invasive stereotactic fixation in single-fraction radiotherapy, together with well known biological advantages for a fractionated regimen. The high positioning accuracy allows to decrease the commonly added safety margins. This leads to an enormous reduction of irradiated tumor-surrounding healthy tissue. The PPSU realizes automatic patient setup, patient motion detection and online movement compensation during therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amelung J., Ristow B.; Precise measurement of the head position in radiation therapy; CAR 1995; book of abstracts; pp: 1301; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck-Bornholdt H.-P., Schmidt R., Schwarz R.; Biological isoeffect distributions: Consideration of the influence of dose per fraction and overall treatment time. A possible tool in future treatment planning; Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 167; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bijhold J.; Three-dimensional verification of patient placement during radiotherapy using portal images; Med. Phys. 20: 347–56; 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gall K., Verhey L.; Computer-assisted positioning of radiotherapy patients using implanted radio-opaque fiducials; Med. Phys. 20: 1153–59; 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gildersleve J., Dearnaley D., Evans P., Swindell W.; Reproducibility of patient positioning during routine radiotherapy, as assessed by an integrated megavoltage imaging system; Radiotherapy and Oncology 35: 151–60; 1995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hess C., Kortmann R., Jany R., Bamberg M.; Accuracy of field alignment in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer utilizing individualized face mask immobilization: a retrospective analysis of clinical practice; Radiotherapy and Oncology 34; 69–72; 1995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelsey C., Lane R., Connor W.; Measurement of patient movement during radiation therapy; Radiology 103: 697–698; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kortmann R.-D., Hess C., Hoffmann W. et al; Is the standardized helmet technique adequate for irradiation of the brain and the cranial meninges?; Int. J.-Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 32: 241–44; 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus K.; Photogrammetrie; Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Bonn: Dümmler; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lam K., Haken R., McShan D.; Automated determination of patient setup errors in radiation therapy using radio-opaque markers; Med. Phys. 20: 1145–52; 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leksell L.; The stereotactic method and radiosurgery of the brain; Acta Chir. Scand. 102; 316–19; 1951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menke M., Hirschfeld F., Mack T., Pastyr O., Schlegel W.; Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractinated radiotherapy; Int. J.-Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 29: 1147–55; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niemierko A., Goitein M.; Modeling of normal tissue response to radiation: The critical volume model; Int. J.-Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 25: 135–45; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Niewald M.; Lehmann W. et al; Plastic materials used to optimize radiotherapy of head and neck tumors and the mammary carcinoma; Radiother. Oncol. 11: 55–63; 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Norwood H., Stubbs B.; Patient movements during radiotherapy; Br. J. Radiol. 57: 155–58; 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okutomi M., Kanade F.; A multiple-baseline stereo; IEEE, Trans. Pat. Mach. Int.; Vol. 15; No. 4; pp 353–363; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schlegel W., Pastyr O., Bortfeld T. et al; Computer systems and mechanical tools for stereotactically guided conformation therapy with linear accelerators; Int. J.-Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 24: 781–87; 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selvik G.; Roentgen stereophotogrammetry; Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 232, 60; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sturm V., Pastyr O., Schlegel W. et al; Stereotactic computer tomography with a modified Riechert-Mundinger device as the basis for integrated stereotactic neuroradiological investigations; Acta Neurochir 68: 11–17; 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai R.; A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses; IEEE, J. of Robotics and automation; Vol RA-3: 323–44; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Vlugt G., Rüther H.; A real-time photogrammetric system for patient positioning in proton therapy; Int. Arch. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 28: 880–85; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Webb S., Nahum A.; A model for calculating tumor control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density; Phys. Med. Biol. 38: 653–66; 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weltens C., Kesteloot K., Vandevelde G., Van Den Bogaert W.; Comparison of plastic and ORFIT© masks for patient head fixation during radiotherapy: precision and costs; Int. J.-Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 33: 499–507; 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Withers H.; Biological basis of radiation therapy; In: Perez C., Brady L.; ed. Principles and practice of radiation oncology; 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott,Co; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jocelyne Troccaz Eric Grimson Ralph Mösges

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lappe, C. et al. (1997). Computer-controlled noninvasive patient positioning in fractionated radiotherapy — A videogrammetric system for automatic patient setup, fast detection of patient motion and online correction of target point misalignment during therapy. In: Troccaz, J., Grimson, E., Mösges, R. (eds) CVRMed-MRCAS'97. CVRMed MRCAS 1997 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029295

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029295

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68499-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics