Skip to main content

Automated revision of expert rules for treating acute abdominal pain in children

  • Knowledge Acquisition and Learning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1211))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Decision making knowledge acquired directly from a medical expert is often incorrect and incomplete. Another source of knowledge about a decision making problem are examples of expert decisions in situations that have occurred in practice, stored in patient records of clinical information systems. Such examples can be used to revise the expert-provided knowledge, i.e., to discover and repair its deficiences. The revised knowledge performs better than the original one and often better than rules learned from examples alone. In addition, it inherits parts of the original expert knowledge and is thus easier to understand and accept for the expert. We present an application of the machine learning approach of theory revision to the problem of revising an expert-provided theory for treating children with acute abdominal pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baffes, P.T., and Mooney, R.J. (1993). Symbolic revision of theories with M-of-N rules. In Proc. Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1135–1140. Chambery, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Dombal, F.T. (1991). Diagnosis of abdominal pain. Churchil Livingstone, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Jong, J.F., and Mooney, R.J. (1986). Explanation based learning: an alternative view. Machine Learning, 1(2): 145–176.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morik, K., Wrobel, S., Kietz, J.-U., and Emde, W. (1993). Knowledge Acquisition and Machine Learning — Theory, Methods, and Applications. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Potamias, G., Moustakis, V., and Charissis, G. (1996). Iterative knowledge construction and maintenance. In Proc. ICML'96 Workshop Machine Learning Meets Human Computer Interaction. Bari, Italy, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richards, B.L., and Mooney, R.J. (1991). Refinement of first-order Horn-clause domain theories. Machine Learning, 19(2): 95–131.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ourston, D., and Mooney, R.J. (1994). Theory refinement combining analytical and empirical methods. Artificial Intelligence, 66: 273–309.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waldschmit, J., and Charissis, G. (1990). Das akute Abdomen im Kindesalter. Diagnose und Differentialdiagnose. Edition Medezin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Elpida Keravnou Catherine Garbay Robert Baud Jeremy Wyatt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Džeroski, S., Potamias, G., Moustakis, V., Charissis, G. (1997). Automated revision of expert rules for treating acute abdominal pain in children. In: Keravnou, E., Garbay, C., Baud, R., Wyatt, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029440

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029440

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62709-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68448-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics