Skip to main content

CAD modelling in multidisciplinary design domains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1454))

Abstract

In a multidisciplinary design environment, such as the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) domain, the various designers will have their own views, concepts and representations of design objects, making communication in a CAD environment a complex task. This paper demonstrates that by taking into consideration the concepts of function and purpose such multiple views and representations can be accomodated. The representation of the functional properties of design objects and their purpose is the underlying basis for the formation of different representations and the coordination of these representations. The paper puts forward definitions for function and purpose which allow for the representation of these properties of a design object and for interdisciplinary communication and integration in a CAD environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Madison: Conference papers. Ist Int. Symposium Building Systems AutomationIntegration, June 2–8, Madison, Wisconsin. Dept. of Eng. Professional Development, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Extension, Madison (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howell, I.: The need for interoperability in the construction industry. In: INCIT 96 Proceedings. The Institution of Engineers, ACT, Australia (1996) 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjork, B-C.: RATAS: A proposed Finnish building product model. Studies in Environmental Research No. T6. Helsinki University of Technology, Otaneimi, Finland (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjork, B-C.: Basic structure of a proposed building product model. CAD (1989) 21(2): 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gielingh, W.F.: General AEC Reference Model (GARM). ISO TC184/SC4/WG1 Document N329 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nederveen, S.V., Plokker, W. and Rombouts, W.: A building data modelling exercise using the GARM approach. COMBINE Report (working draft) (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howard, H.C., Abdalla, J.A. and Phan, D.H.: Primitive-composite approach for structural data modelling. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering (1992) 6(1):19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amor, R.W. and Hosking, J.G.: Multi-disciplinary views for integrated and concurrent design. In: Mathur, K.S., Betts, M.P. and Tham, K.W. (eds.): Management of Information Technology for Construction. World Scientific, Singapore (1993) 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clayton, M.J., Fruchter, R., Krawinkler, H. and Teicholz, P.: Interpretation objects for multi-disciplinary design. In: Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Design `94. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1994) 573–590.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacKellar, B.K. and Peckham, J.: Specifying multiple representations of design objects in SORAC. In: Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Design '94. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1994) 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenman, M.A., Gero, J.S. and Hwang, Y-S.: Representation of multiple concepts of a design objects based on multiple functions. In: Mathur, K.S., Betts, M.P. and Tham, K.W. (eds.): Management of Information Technology for Construction. World Scientific, Singapore (1993) 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenman, M.A. and Gero J.S.: Modelling multiple views of design objects in a collaborative CAD environment. CAD Special Issue on AI in Design (1996) 28(3): 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nederveen, S.V.: View integration in building design. In: Mathur, K.S., Betts, M.P. and Tham, K.W. (eds.): Management of Information Technology for Construction. World Scientific, Singapore (1993) 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nederveen, G.A. van and Tolman, F.P.: Modelling multiple views on buildings. Automation in Construction (1992). 1:215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pierra, G.: A multiple perspective object oriented model for engineering design. In: Zhang, X. (ed.): New Advances in Computer Aided Design & Computer Graphics. International Academic Publishers, Beijing, China (1993) 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bobrow, D.G.: Qualitative reasoning about physical systems: an introduction. Artificial Intelligence (1984) 24:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sembugamoorthy, V. and Chandrasekaran, B.: Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. In: Kolodner, J. and Riesbeck, C. (eds.): Experience, Reasoning and Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1986) 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pahl, G, and Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer-Verlag (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Tomiyama, T. and Yoshikawa, H.: Function, behaviour, and structure. In Gero, J.S. (ed.): Applications of Artificial Engineering in Engineering V, Vol 1: Design. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, (1990) 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goel, A.K.: Representation of design functions in experience-based design. In: Brown, D.C., Waldron, M. and Yoshikawa, H. (eds): Intelligent Computer Aided Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991) 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hundal, M.S.: Conceptual design of technical systems. In: Proceedings of the 1991 NSF Design and Manufacturing Systems Conference. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Michigan, (1991) 1041–49.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, A.L.: Designing by functions. Design Studies (1991) 12(1): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gero, J.S., Tham, K.W. and Lee, H.S.: Behaviour: A link between function and structure in design. In: Brown, D.C., Waldron, M. and Yoshikawa, H. (eds): Intelligent Computer Aided Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992) 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sturges, R.H.: A computational model for conceptual design based on function logic. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.): Artificial Intelligence in Design '92. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, (1992) 757–772.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenman, M.A. and Gero, J.S.: Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical. Design Studies (1998) (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  26. STEP: Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles, Draft N14. ISO TC 184/SC4/WG6 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, (1990) 11(4):26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang, Y.S.: Design Semantics and CAD Databases. PhD Thesis, Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, Sydney. (1994) (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fruchter, R., Reiner, K., Leifer, L. and Toye, G.: VisionManager: A computer environment for design evolution capture. In: Gero, J.S. and Sudweeks, F. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Design '96. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1996) 505–524.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ian Smith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenman, M.A., Gero, J.S. (1998). CAD modelling in multidisciplinary design domains. In: Smith, I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Structural Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1454. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030461

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030461

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64806-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics