Skip to main content

Logic, gestalt theory, and neural computation in research on auditory perceptual organization

  • I. Gestalt Theory Revisited
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Music, Gestalt, and Computing (JIC 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1317))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

In our paper we discuss the Berlin Gestalt theory, its relation to modelling with artificial neural networks and ask if Gestalt theory may serve as a paradigm for future research on music perception in the realm of (computational) auditory perceptual organization. To answer this question, we made a logical analysis of important Gestaltist concepts from the point of view of philosophy of science, discuss a particular model of brain functioning and perception which is often assumed to be a modified follow up of Gestalt theory, and study Gestalt theory in relation to modelling perceptual organization with artificial neural networks using some well known facts from automata theory. The paper is divided into three parts: (i) Gestalt theoretical concepts such as “Gestaltqualität”, functional whole (“Wirkungszusammenhang”) and emergence are studied in discussing prior logical interpretations of Gestalt theory, (ii) K. Pribram's holographic brain metaphor is discussed in relation to W. Köhler's concept of a functional whole and related to artificial neural network research, (iii) the relevance of Gestalt theory — especially the principle of “Prägnanz” and the concept of a functional whole — in connection to artificial neural networks for research on perceptual organization is analysed. The idea of emergent computations is discussed with regard to concepts from automata theory. In our conclusion we present an answer to our main question and give some hints for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J., & Hinton, G. (1981). Models of information processing in the brain. In G. Hinton & J. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel models of associative memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. (1964). Brains, machines and mathematics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., & Kim, J. (1992). Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospective of nonreductive physicalism. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, G. (1944). Holism, historicism, and emergence. Philosophy of Science, 11, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg, V. (1986). Künstliche Wesen: Verhalten kybernetischer Vehikel. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, H. (1995). Gehör. In L. Finscher (Ed.), Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Vol. 3. Kassel: Bärenreiter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1929). Abriss der Logistik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Relationstheorie und ihrer Anwendungen. Vienna: Julius Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G., & Reeke, G. (1990). Is it possible to construct a perception machine? Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 134, 36–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. (1995). Hard problems in computational auditory scene analysis. (http://sound.media.mit.edu/dpwe/writing/hard-probs.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, A. (1942). Scientific method and the concept of emergence. The Journal of Philosophy, 39, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. (1974). Choosing a paradigm for perception. In E. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Vol. I: Historical and philosophical roots of perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelling, K., & Oppenheim, P. (1937/1938a). Der Gestaltbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik. Erkenntnis, 7, 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelling, K., & Oppenheim, P. (1937/1938b). Supplementary remarks on the concept of Gestalt. Erkenntnis, 7, 357–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelling, K., & Oppenheim, P. (1988a). The concept of Gestalt in the light of modern logic. In B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory. Munich, Vienna: Philosophia Verlag. (Original work published 1937/1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelling, K., & Oppenheim, P. (1988b). Supplementary remarks on the concept of Gestalt. In B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory. Munich, Vienna: Philosophia Verlag. (Original work published 1937/1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, N., & Todd, P. (Eds.). (1994). Music and creativity. (Special issue of Connection Science: Journal of Neural computing, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Research 6(2–3))

    Google Scholar 

  • Haubensack, G. (1985). Absolutes und vergleichendes Urteil. Eine Einführung in die Theorie psychischer Bezugssysteme. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, H., McMullen, T., Popper, A., & Fay, R. (1996). Auditory computation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, P. (1942). The status of emergence. The Journal of Philosophy, 39, 486–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Hüne, P. (1996). Supervenient/Supervenienz. In J. Mittelstraß (Ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Bd. 4. Stuttgart, Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiler, P. (1980). Isomorphie-Konzept und Wertheimer-Problem. Beiträge zu einer historisch-methodologischen Analyse des Köhlerschen Gestaltansatzes, Teil I. Gestalt Theory, 2, 78–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiler, P. (1981). Isomorphie-Konzept und Wertheimer-Problem. Beiträge zu einer historisch-methodologischen Analyse des Köhlerschen Gestaltansatzes, Teil II. Gestalt Theory, 3, 93–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. (1989). Self-organization and associative memory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., & Pomerantz, J. (1981). Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1976). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, G. (1985). Modell-und rekursionstheoretische Grundlagen psychologischer Theorienbildung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, W. (1966). Logische Analyse der Gestalt: Logik und Gestaltpsychologie. Studium Generale, 19, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, M. (1995). Music and schema theory: Cognitive foundations of systematic musicology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, M. (Ed.). (1997). Foundations of pitch and timbre perception. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. (Special issue of Journal of New Music Research, Vol. 26, nr. 2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. (1993). Sound and hearing: A conceptual introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausfeld, R. (1994a). Hermann v.Helmholtz: Die Untersuchung der Funktionsweise des Geistes als Gegenstand einer wissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 45, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausfeld, R. (1994b). Methodologische Grundlagen und Probleme der Psychophysik. In T. Herrmann & W. Tack (Eds.), Methodologische Grundagen der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1965). A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. In Embodiments of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1943)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1952). Wholes, sums, and organic unities. Philosophical Studies, 3, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1971). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1976). On mechanical recognition. Philosophy of Science, 43, 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. (1990). Modern theories of Gestalt perception. Mind and Language, 5, 289–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parberry, I. (1994). Circuit complexitiy and neural networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. II: Cognitive processes and performance. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. (1975). Towards holonomic theory of perception. In S. Ertel, L. Kemmer, & M. Stadler (Eds.), Gestalttheorie in der modernen Psychologie. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. (1991). Brain and perception: Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K., Nuwer, M., & Baron, R. (1974). The holographic hypothesis of memory structure in brain function and perception. In D. Krantz, R. Atkinson, R. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology. Vol. II: Measurement, psychophysics and neural information,processing. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausch, E. (1967). Uber Summativität und Nichtsummativität. In Psychologische Forschung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Grenzwissenchaften. Darmstadt: Reprint of Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1953). Mr. Madden on Gestalt theory. Philosophy of Science, 20, 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N., & Oppenheim, P. (1955). Logical analysis of Gestalt theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, R. (1993). Theorie der neuronalen Netze. Eine systematische Einführung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1994). Psychoneural isomorphism: Historical background and current relevance. Philosophical Psychology, 7, 183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, F., Dev, P., & Smith, B. (1976). Electronic processing of information by brain cells. Science, 193, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamma, S. (1995). Auditory cortex. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, G. (1990). The significance of real neuron architectures for neural network simualitions. In E. Schwartz (Ed.), Computational neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hepherd, G. (1994). Neurobiology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, G., & Koch, C. (1990). Introduction to synaptic circuits. In G. Shepherd (Ed.), The synaptic organization of the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, E. (1995). Automata theory and neural networks. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, M. (1981). Feldtheorie heute-von Wolfgang Köhler zu Karl Pribram. Gestalt Theory, 3, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, A. (1994). Theorien der Emergenz-Metaphysik oder? Grazer Philosophische Studien, 48, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., & Rottmayer, W. (1974). Automata. In E. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Vol. I: Historical and philosophical roots of perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P., & Loy, D. (1991). Music and connectionism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1974). The problem of perceptual structure. In E. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Vol. I: Historical and philosophical roots of perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willshaw, D. (1981). Holography, associative memory, and inductive generalization. In G. Hinton & J. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel models of associative memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, S. (1995). Perceptual grouping. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marc Leman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eichert, R., Schmidt, L., Seifert, U. (1997). Logic, gestalt theory, and neural computation in research on auditory perceptual organization. In: Leman, M. (eds) Music, Gestalt, and Computing. JIC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034108

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63526-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69591-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics