Skip to main content

Performance limits and stiffness control of multifingered hands

  • Chapter 2 Dextrous Manipulation
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental Robotics IV

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 223))

Abstract

This paper investigates the fundamental performance limitations of robot hands in terms of their ability to modulate the stiffness and the center of compliance (CC) of a grasped object. We consider the operation of a Cartesian object stiffness controller in two stages. First, object position is determined from joint measurements. Sliding, rolling, and uncertainty in the initial grasp pose can produce errors in the object location calculated from these joint angles. Since the controller produces restoring forces proportional to the calculated object position, these errors can lead to inaccuracy in the commanded forces. Errors in object position estimation can also cause difficulties in the second stage of the controller operation, force generation, which we analyze in terms of the grasp kinematics errors. In practical terms, the lower limit to attainable stiffness may be set by friction in the robot hand, which increases “effective stiffness” until the frictional forces are exceeded. One upper bound to object stiffness is finger tip compliance. Maximum stiffness is also related to the geometry of the grasp configuration: due to controller stability limits, the maximum usable stiffness decreases as the CC is moved away from the fingers, and increases as the object width increases. These results are experimentally confirmed in a precision assembly task with a two-fingered robot hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Starr, G., Experiments in Assembly Using a Dextrous Hand, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 6(3):342–347, June 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hogan, N., Impedance control: An approach to manipulation, Parts 1, 2, and 3, Transactions of the ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 107:124, March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanafusa, H. and Asada, H., A robot hand with elastic fingers and its application to assembly process. In Brady et al., editors, Robot Motion: Planning and Control, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whitney, D., Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 104:65–77, March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kazerooni, H., Direct-drive active compliant end effector (active RCC), IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 4(3):324–333, June 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salisbury, J. K., Active stiffness control of a manipulator in Cartesian coordinates, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Albuquerque, Dec. 10–12, 1980, pages 95–100. Also reprinted in M. T. Mason and J. K. Salisbury, editors, Robot Hands and the Mechanics of Manipulation, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985, pages 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khatib, O., A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: the operational space formulation, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(1):43–53, February 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cutkosky, M. and Kao, I., Computing and controlling compliance of a robotic hand, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5:151–165, April 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, A., Hsu, P. and Sastry, S., Dynamic regrasping by coordinated control of sliding for a multifingered hand, Proceedings of 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, May 1989, pages 781–786.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montana, D., Tactile Sensing and the Kinematics of Contact, Ph.D. thesis, Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maekawa, H., Komoriya, K. and Tanie, K., Manipulation of an unknown object by multifingered hands with rolling contact using tactile feedback, Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS '92, Raleigh, NC, July 7–10, 1992, pages 1877–1882.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Son, J., Cutkosky, M., and Howe, R., A Comparison of Object Localization by Contact Sensors, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS '95, Pittsburgh, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howe, R., A force reflecting teleoperated hand system for the study of tactile sensing in precision manipulation, Proceedings of 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992, pages 1321–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Son, J. and Howe, R., Tactile sensing and stiffness control with multifingered hands, Technical Report, Harvard University Robotics Laboratory, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Oussama Khatib J. Kenneth Salisbury

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Son, J.S., Howe, R.D. (1997). Performance limits and stiffness control of multifingered hands. In: Khatib, O., Salisbury, J.K. (eds) Experimental Robotics IV. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035200

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035200

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76133-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40942-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics