Skip to main content

Experimental examination of the identification methods for an industrial robot manipulator

  • Section 10: Modelling And Control
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 190))

Abstract

The step-by-step method and the simultaneous method have been experimentally examined to estimate the dynamic model of PUMA 560. The merits and demerits of the both method are discussed and compared. To evaluate the accuracy of the estimated parameter values, the joint angle trajectories of a real motion and the simulated motions have been compared. From those results it can be said the step-by-step method is more accurate way to estimate the model parameter values than the simultaneous method. The estimated parameter values obtained by the both method will be accurate for the purpose of model based control of the industrial manipulator.

To establish the modeling method for the model based control of industrial manipulators, more experimental works on various types of manipulators are required. In further studies along this line, we will confont the necessity to take into account of compliance of the joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.H.An, C.G.Atkeson and J.M.Hollerbach, Model-Based Control of a Robot Manipulator. The MIT Press. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Mayeda, K. Yoshida and K. Osuka, Base parameters of Manipulator Dynamic Model. IEEE J. of Robotics and Automation, Vol.6,No3,pp.312–321. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Mayeda and K. Ohashi, Base parameters of Dynamic Models for General Open Loop Kinematic Chains, Robotics Research 5,pp.271–278. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.Mayeda, K.Osuka and A.Kangawa, A New Identification Method for Serial Manipulator Arms. Proc. 9th IFAC World Congress, pp.2429–2424. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.Ozaki, H.Hashimoto, M.Maruyama and H.Mayeda, Identification for a Direct Drive Robot „DARM-2”. Proc. of IEEE IECON'90. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Kawasaki and K. Nishimura, Parameter Identification of Mechanical Manipulators. SICE Trans. Vol.22,No1,pp.76–83. 1986.(in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.K.Khosla, Real-Time Control and Identification of Direct-Drive Manipulators. Ph.D. dissertation. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.G. Atkeson, C.H. An and J.M. Hollerbach, Estimation of Inertial Parameters of Manipulator Loads and Links. Int.J.Robotics Research, Vol.5,No3,pp.101–119. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.Mayeda and M.Maruyama, Identification Method for General Open-Loop Kinematic Chain Dynamic Model. Proc. of SICE'89,pp.1091–1094. 1989. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Raja Chatila Gerd Hirzinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mayeda, H., Maruyama, M., Yoshida, K., Ikeda, N., Kuwaki, O. (1993). Experimental examination of the identification methods for an industrial robot manipulator. In: Chatila, R., Hirzinger, G. (eds) Experimental Robotics II. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0036164

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0036164

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19851-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39323-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics