Skip to main content

Non-monotonicity and conditionals in dialogue logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 127 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 475))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D.: Entailment, Vol. 1, Princeton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barth, E. M., Krabbe, E. C. W.: From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Berlin, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blue, N. A.: A Metalinguistic Interpretation of Counterfactual Conditionals, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 1981, pp. 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chisholm, R. M.: Law Statements and Counterfactua Inference, in: Analysis 15, 1955, pp. 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz, R. M.: Topics in the Logic of Relevance, München, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Felscher, W.: Dialogues as a Foundation for Intuitionistic Logic, in: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, Dordrecht, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman, N.: The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals, in: Journal of Philosophy 44, 1947, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanks, S., McDermott, D.: Default Reasoning, Nonmonotonic Logics and the Frame Problem, in: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1986, pp. 328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoepelman, J. Ph.: Action, Comparison and Change. A Study in the Semantics of Verbs and Adjectives, Tübingen, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoepelman, J. Ph., van Hoof, A. J. M.: The Success of Failure. The Concept of Failure in Dialogue Logics and its Relevance for Natural Language Semantics, in Proceedings of COLING Budapest, Budapest, 1988, pp. 250–255.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoepelman, J. Ph., van Hoof, A. J. M.: Two-Role Two-Party Semantics: Knowledge Representation, Conditionals and Non-Monotonicity, Oxford, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krabbe, E. C. W.: Studies in Dialogical Logic, dissertation, University of Groningen, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krabbe, E. C. W.: Noncumulative Dialectical Models and Formal Dialectics, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, 1985, pp. 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kratzer, A.: Partition and Revision: the Semantics of Counterfactuals, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 1981, pp. 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pollock, J. L.: A Refined Theory of Counterfactuals, in Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 1981, pp. 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rott, H.: A Nonmonotonic Conditional Logic for Belief Revision. Part I: Semantics and Logic, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning 1989, GMD Arbeitspapier 443, 1990, pp. 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tichý, P.: Subjunctive Conditionals: Two Parameters vs Three, in: Philosophical Studies 45, 1984, pp. 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valerius, R.: The Logic of Frame-and Stoprules in Lorenzen Games, FhG-IAO Internal Paper, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter Schroeder-Heister

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Hoof, T., Hoepelman, J. (1991). Non-monotonicity and conditionals in dialogue logic. In: Schroeder-Heister, P. (eds) Extensions of Logic Programming. ELP 1989. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 475. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0038702

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0038702

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53590-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46879-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics