Skip to main content

A belief-centered treatment of pragmatic presupposition

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1328))

Abstract

Traditional, semantic, accounts of presupposition centre on truth conditional treatments relying on entailments. In contrast, our work concentrates on the investigation of presupposition as a pragmatic phenomenon which interacts with agents’ beliefs. Several accounts (e.g., [1],[2],[5],[6],[7],[8],[23]) have taken contextual factors into account. However, they run into problems caused by the consequences of the basic possible world based notions of propositionhood they deploy, which prevent the formulation of partial, revisable information states.

Starting from a notion of proposition developed in property theory ([20],[21],[22]), we develop a formal model of contexts as partial beliefs entertained by agents, who do not necessarily hold accurate or compatible views. We show how this model can be exploited in the treatment of the projection problem for conditionals, conjunctions and disjunctions. We show that a treatment along these lines provides an adequate model of complex presuppositional behaviour, including the projection problem. We contrast our results with those obtained in other approaches.

Supported by a grant from the CNPq —Brazil, grant number 200492/92-6

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. I. Beaver. “The Kinematics of Presupposition”. Reader of the Fifth European Summer School in logic, language and information, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. I. Beaver. What Comes First in Dynamic Semantics. ILLC Prepublication Series LP-93-15, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. de Roeck, R. Ball, K. Brown, C. Fox, M. Groefsema, N. Oeid and R. Turner. “Helpful Answers to Modal and Hypothetical Questions”. Procceedings of the 1991 ACL, European Chapter. Berlin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Frege. “On Sense and Reference”. In P.T. Geach and M. Black editors, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Blackwell, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Gazdar. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. Academic Press, New York, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Heim. “On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions”. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 2:114–126. Stanford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Karttunen. “Presuppositions and Compound Sentences”. Linguistic Inquiry 4:169–193, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Karttunen. “Presupposition and Linguistic Context”. Theoretical Linguistics, 1:181–194, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Karttunen and S. Peters. “Conventional Implicature”. In C.-K. Oh and D. Dinneen editors, Syntax and Semantics, Presupposition, 11:1–56. Academic Press, New York, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kleene. Introduction of Metamathematics. Van Nostrand, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. T. Langendoen and H. B. Savin. “The Projection Problem for Presuppositions”. In C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen, editors, Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pages 54–60. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Obeid. “Partial Models Basis for Non-Monotonic Reasoning”. Research Notes CSM-140. Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, U.K., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Obeid. “Three Valued Logic and Non-monotonic Reasoning”. Journal of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 15, no. 6, 1996. (To appear)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Soames. “A Projection Problem for Speaker Presuppositions”. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(4):623–666, Fall 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Soames. “How Presuppositions are inherited: A Solution to the Projection Problem”. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(3):483–545. Summer 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Soames. “Presupposition”, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic —Topics in the Philosophy of Language, pages 553–617. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. C. Stalnaker. “Presuppositions”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2:447–457, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. C. Stalnaker. “Pragmatic Presuppositions”, In M.K. Munitz and P.K. Unger, editors, Semantics and Philosophy, pages 197–213. New York University Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.F. Strawson. “On Refering”, Mind 59:320–344, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Turner. “A Theory of Properties”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52(2):455–472, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Turner. “Properties, Propositions and Semantic Theory”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Formal Semantics, Lugano, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Turner. Truth and Modality for Knowledge Representation, Pitman Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. van der Sandt. Context and Presupposition, Croom Helm, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. A. van der Sandt. “Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution”, Journal of Semantics, 9:333–377, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Retoré

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Manara, L.H.B., De Roeck, A. (1997). A belief-centered treatment of pragmatic presupposition. In: Retoré, C. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1328. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052162

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052162

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63700-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69631-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics