Skip to main content

Varying fitness functions in genetic algorithms: Studying the rate of increase of the dynamic penalty terms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V (PPSN 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present a promising technique that enhances the efficiency of GAs, when they are applied to constrained optimisation problems. According to this technique, the problem constraints are included in the fitness function as penalty terms, that vary during the GA evolution, facilitating thus the location of the global optimum and the avoidance of local optima. Moreover we proceed to test the effect that the rate of change in the fitness function has on GA performance. The tests are performed on two well-known real-world optimisation problems: the Cutting Stock problem and the Unit Commitment problem. Comparative results are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Bakirtzis, V. Petridis and S. Kazarlis, “A Genetic Algorithm Solution to the Economic Dispatch Problem”, IEE Proceedings — Generation Transmission Distribution, Vol. 141, No. 4, July 1994, p.p. 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. R. Brown, “Optimum packing and Depletion”, American Elsevier Inc., 1971, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Davis, “Adapting operator probabilities in genetic algorithms”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, San Mateo, California, Morgan Kaufman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Dyckhoff, “A Typology of Cutting and Packing Problems”, European Journal of Operational Research 44, 1990, pp. 145–159.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. A. Joines and C. R. Houck, “On the Use of Non-Stationary Penalty Functions to Solve Nonlinear Constrained Optimisation Problems with GA's,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Service Center, 1994, pp. 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Kazarlis, A. G. Bakirtzis and V. Petridis, “A Genetic Algorithm Solution to the Unit Commitment Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, February 1996, pp. 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Dasgupta and D. R. McGregor, “Thermal Unit Commitment using Genetic Algorithms,” IEE Proceedings — Part C: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 141, No. 5, September 1994, pp. 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Michalewicz and G. Nazhiyath, “Genocop III: A Co-evolutionary Algorithm for Numerical Optimisation Problems with Nonlinear Constraints,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2, Perth-Australia, 29 Nov. — 1 Dec. 1995, pp. 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. A. Miller. W. D. Potter, R. V. Gandham and C. N. Lapena, “An Evaluation of Local Improvement Operators for Genetic Algorithms”, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 23, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Petridis and S. Kazarlis “Varying Quality Function in Genetic Algorithms and the Cutting Problem”, in Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '94 as part of WCCI'94), IEEE Service Center, 1994, Vol. l, pp. 166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Petridis, S. Kazarlis and A. Bakirtzis, “Varying Fitness Functions in Genetic Algorithm Constrained Optimisation: The Cutting Stock and Unit Commitment Problems,” accepted for publication at the IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol 28 Part B No 5 issue of October 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. E. Smith and D. M. Tate, “Genetic Optimisation Using A Penalty Function,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, S. Forrest, Ed. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, pp. 499–505.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.M. Spears and K.A. De Jong, “An Analysis of Multi-Point Crossover” in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo California, Morgan Kaufman, 1991, pp. 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paul. E. Sweeney, Elizabeth Ridenour Paternoster, “Cutting and Packing Problems: A categorized Application — Oriented Research Bibliography”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 43, No. 7, p.p. 691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.J. Wood and B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation Operation and Control, 1984, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Agoston E. Eiben Thomas Bäck Marc Schoenauer Hans-Paul Schwefel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kazarlis, S., Petridis, V. (1998). Varying fitness functions in genetic algorithms: Studying the rate of increase of the dynamic penalty terms. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056864

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056864

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49672-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics