Skip to main content

Development of problem-specific evolutionary algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V (PPSN 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is a broadly accepted fact that evolutionary algorithms (EA) have to be developed problem-specifically. Usually this is based on experience and experiments. Though, most EA environments are not suited for such an approach. Therefore, this paper proposes a few basic concepts which should be supplied by modern EA simulators in order to serve as a toolkit for the development of such algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Alicke, D. Arnold, and V. Dörrsam. (R)evolution in layout-planning — a new hybrid genetic algorithm to generate optimal aisles in a utility layout. In H.-J. Zimmermann, editor, Eufit 97 — 5th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, pages 788–793, Aachen, 1997. Verlag Mainz, Wissenschaftsverlag, Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Amos, K. Jung, B. Kawetzki, W. Kuhn, O. Pertler, R. Reißing, and M. Schaal. Endbericht der Projektgruppe Genetische Algorithmen. Technical Report FK95/1, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Computer Science, Dept. Formal Concepts, 1995. german.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Banzhaf. Genotype-phenotype-mapping and neutral variation — a case study in genetic programming. In Davidor et al. [DSM94].

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.K. Belew and L.B. Booker, editors. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms — ICGA V, San Mateo, California, 1991. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Bäck, D.B. Fogel, and Z. Michalewiez, editors. Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. IOP Puplishing Ltd and Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Bäck, F. Hoffmeister, and H.-P. Schwefel. A survey of evolution strategies. In Belew and Booker [BB91].

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Bierwirth, D. Mattfeld, and H. Kopfer. On permutation representations for scheduling problems. In Voigt et al. [VERS96].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laura Dekker, Jason Kingdon, and J. R. Filho. GAME Version 2.01, User's Manual. University College London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Duvivier, Ph. Preux, and E.-G. Talbi. Climbing up NP-hard hills. In Voigt et al. [VERS96].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Davidor, H.-P. Schwefel, and R. Maenner, editors. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN III, volume 866 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 1994. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.B. Fogel. An analysis of evolutionary programming. In D.B. Fogel and J. W. Atmar, editors. Proceedings of the First annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, La Jolla, 1992. Evolutionary Programming Society.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.-L. Fang, P. Ross, and D. Corne. A promising genetic algorithm approach to job-shop scheduling, rescheduling and open-shop scheduling problems. In Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pages 375–382. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Großmann, A. Leonhardi, and T. Schmidt. Abschlußbericht der Projektgruppe Evolutionäre Algorithmen. Technical Report 2, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Computer Science, 1997. german.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley, Reading, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Grefenstette. A User's Guide to GENESIS, Version 5.0, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Herdy. Evolution strategies with subjective selection. In Voigt et al. [VERS96].

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Iba, H. de Garis, and T. Sato. Genetic programming with local hill-climbing. In Davidor et al. [DSM94].

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Jung and N. Weicker. Funktionale Spezifikation des Software-Tools EAGLE. Technical Report FK95/2, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Computer Science, Dept. Formal Concepts, 1995. german.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Kawetzki. Topologieoptimierung diskreter Tragwerke mittels Evolutionsstrategien am Beispiel ebener Fachwerke. Master's thesis, University of Stuttgart, 1996. german.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.R. Koza. Genetic Programming. MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Leonhardi. Eine Beschreibungssprache für Evolutionäre Algorithmen. Master's thesis, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Computer Science, 1997. german.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Lin and B. Kernighan. An efficient heuristic procedure for the traveling salesman problem. Operations Res., 21:498–516, 1973.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. M. McIlhagga, P. Husbands, and R. Ives. A comparison of search techniques on a wing-box optimisation problem. In Voigt et al. [VERS96].

    Google Scholar 

  25. P.D. Surry and N.J. Radcliffe. RPL2: A language and parallel framework for evolutionary computing. In Davidor et al. [DSM94].

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Sebag and M. Schoenauer. Controlling crossover through inductive learning. In Davidor et al. [DSM94].

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Tsutsui, A. Ghosh, and Y. Fujimoto. A robust solution searching scheme in genetic search. In Voigt et al. [VERS96].

    Google Scholar 

  28. H.-M. Voigt, J. Born, and J. Treptow. The Evolution Machine, Manual, Version 2.1. Institute for Informatics and Computing Techniques, Berlin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H.-M. Voigt, W. Ebeling, I. Rechenberg, and H.-P. Schwefel, editors. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN IV, volume 1141 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 1996. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Vigo and V. Maniezzo. A genetic/tabu thresholding hybrid algorithm for the process allocation problem. Journal of Heuristics, 3(2):91–110, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Whitley, V.S. Gordon, and K. Mathias. Lamarckian evolution, the baldwin effect and function optimization. In Davidor et al. [DSM94].

    Google Scholar 

  32. D.H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions On Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):67–82, April 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Agoston E. Eiben Thomas Bäck Marc Schoenauer Hans-Paul Schwefel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leonhardi, A., Reissenberger, W., Schmelmer, T., Weicker, K., Weicker, N. (1998). Development of problem-specific evolutionary algorithms. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056881

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056881

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49672-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics