Skip to main content

Implementing genetic algorithms with sterical constraints for protein structure prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1498))

Abstract

In this paper we present new kinds of genetic operators for protein structure prediction. These operators solve the problem of atom collisions during the conformational search. They restrict the search space to collision-free conformations by enforcing sterical constraints on the protein at each optimization step.

The results are compared to a standard genetic algorithm. The sterical constraint operators improve the results of the genetic algorithm by many orders of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Merz K.M., Le Grand S.M.; The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction. Birkhäuser (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones D.: Progress in protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 7: 377–387 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stryer L.: Biochemistry. Freeman & Co. (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Battle D.L.: Implementing Genetic Algorithms; Masters Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein A.: Protein structure: what is possible to predict now? Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 7: 60–71 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Unger R., Moult J.: Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations. J.Mol.Biol. 231, S.75–81 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pederson J., Moult J.: Ab initio structure prediction for small polypeptides and protein fragments using genetic algorithms. Proteins 23: 454–460 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scheraga H.A., Browman J., Carruthers L.M., Kashuba K.L., Momamy F.A., Pottle M.S., Rosen S.P., Rumsey S.M.: Ecepp/2: Empirical Conformational Energy Program for Peptides. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, QCPE 454.

    Google Scholar 

  9. see entry “1ABL” of protein database at http://www.pdb.bnl.gov

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pisabarro MT, Ortiz AR, Serrano L, Wade RC: Homology modeling of the Abl-SH3 domain. Proteins 20(3): 203–215 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beiersdörfer S., Schmitt J., Sauer M., Schulz A., Siebert S., Hesser J., Männer R., Wolfrum J.: Finding the Conformation of Organic Molecules with Genetic Algorithms. Lecture Notes in Comp.Sci., 1141, S. 972–981, Springer Verlag (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran G.N., Ramakrishnan C., Sasisekharan V.: Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J.Mol.Biol. 7, 95–99, (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Agoston E. Eiben Thomas Bäck Marc Schoenauer Hans-Paul Schwefel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bindewald, E., Hesser, J., Männer, R. (1998). Implementing genetic algorithms with sterical constraints for protein structure prediction. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056937

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056937

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49672-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics