Skip to main content

Deriving relationships between integrity constraints for schema comparison

  • Regular Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1475))

Abstract

Schema comparison is essential for integrating different database schemata. Since the semantics of a schema is also represented by its integrity constraints, they must be considered by a correct schema comparison method. Especially the extensional relationships between classes are determined by the relationship between the corresponding integrity constraint sets. In this paper, we work out the relationships between different types of integrity constraints. As a result, we present rule for comparing integrity constraint sets. These rules can be used after a schema conforming step, where naming, type and structural conflicts are solved, to exactly fix the extensional relationship between object classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, S. B. Navathe. A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323–364, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Dupont, S. Spaccapietra. Schema Integration Engineering in Cooperative Databases Systems. In [8], pp. 759–765.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Garcia-Solaco, M. Castellanos, F. Saltor. A Semantic-Discriminated Approach to Integration in Federated Databases. In S. Laufmann, S. Spaccapietra, T. Yokoi (eds.), Proc. CoopIS’95, pp. 19–31, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. B. Navathe, R. Elmasri, J. A. Larson. Integrating User Views in Database Design. IEEE Computer, 19(1):50–62, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Schmitt, G. Saake. Schema Integration and View Generation by Resolving Intensional and Extensional Overlappings. In [8], pp. 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. P. Sheth, J. A. Larson. Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3):183–236, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent, Y. Dupont. Model Independent Assertions for Integration of Heterogeneous Schemas. The VLDB Journal, 1(1):81–126, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Yetongnon, S. Hariri (eds.). Proc. 9th ISCA Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems, PDCS’96, International Society for Computers and Their Application, Six Forks Road, Releigh, NC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Witold Litwin Tadeusz Morzy Gottfried Vossen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Türker, C., Saake, G. (1998). Deriving relationships between integrity constraints for schema comparison. In: Litwin, W., Morzy, T., Vossen, G. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1475. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057732

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057732

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64924-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68309-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics