Skip to main content

Knowledge discovery in clinical databases: An experiment with rule induction and statistics

  • Communications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1609))

Abstract

The main difference between empirical learning methods and KDD methods is that the latter approaches support discovery of knowledge in databases whereas the former ones focus on extraction of accurate knowledge from databases. Therefore, for application of KDD methods, domain experts’ interpretation of induced results is crucial. However, conventional approaches do not focus on this issue clearly. In this paper, several KDD methods are compared by using a common database and the induced results are interpreted by a medical expert, which enables us to characterize KDD methods more concretely and to show the importance of interaction between KDD researchers and domain experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.D. and Victor, M. Principles of Neurology, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., and Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases, Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD 93), pp. 207–216 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, T.W.: An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L., Freidman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C.: Classification And Regression Trees., Wadsworth International Group (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fayyad, U.M., et al. (eds.): Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pawlak, Z. Rough Sets, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. and Frawley, W.: Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI Press (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Readings in Machine Learning, (Shavlik, J.W. and Dietterich, T.G., eds.) Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsumoto, S., et al. Examination of factors important to predict the prognosis of virus meningoencephalitis. Japanese Kanto Journal of Acute Medicine, 12, 710–711 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsumoto, S., Ziarko, W., Shan, N., Tanaka, H.: Knowledge Discovery in Clinical Databases based on Variable Precision Rough Set Model Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care Journal of the AMIA 2, supplement, pp. 270–274 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ziarko, W. Variable Precision Rough Set Model, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 46: 39–59 (1993).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Zbigniew W. Raś Andrzej Skowron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsumoto, S. (1999). Knowledge discovery in clinical databases: An experiment with rule induction and statistics. In: Raś, Z.W., Skowron, A. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1609. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095121

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095121

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65965-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48828-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics