Abstract
Total Quality Management (TQM) in various forms has for decades proved successful in improving productivity; continuous improvement and learning being essential tools also in Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Our suggestion for any improvement system is 1) Adjust ambitions to the sociopsychological climate in a unit before embarking on the explicit improvement road. 2) Without the backing of other managers, solutions may create harm rather than improvements 3) In a small unit, sophistication of the information technology will have insignificant effects 4) Align the reward mechanisms closely with what is to be achieved. 5) First analyse information that is collected for other primary purposes; then consider creating supplementing systems. This is based on our experience as a Quality System Advisor and Lead Auditor as well as with the Total Quality Management (TQM) practice of Det Norske Veritas (DNV). An improvement process was created and used for 9 months in a small unit in 1995–1996. No sophisticated technology was used. Many improvements took place in the 9 month period the system was operated, however it is questionable whether the success matched the expense (time, frustration, interpersonal friction, unrest). In this paper we describe the life and death of a small scale experience-database.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argyris, Chris, 1991: “Teaching Smart Peole How to Learn”. Becoming a learning organization, Harvard Business Review Reprint 1997, Boston.
Argyris, Chris, 1994: “Good Communication That Blocks Learning. What is a Learning Organization?”, Harvard Business Review Reprint 1997, Boston.
Buene, Leif & Moen, Anne Sigrun 1996: Organisational Learning. Tech. Report. DNV 97-2011.
Deming, Edwards W., 1986: “Out of the crisis”. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Det Norske Veritas, CMS 110 1997: Total Quality Management in DNV, rev 0, 1997-04-24.
European Foundation for Quality Management, 1996: Assessor Manual/Training binder. EFQM, Bruxelles.
Giæver, Henrik, 1998: “Does Total Quality Management Restrain Innovation?”, Sociology Thesis, University of Oslo.
Hackman, J. Richard, 1995: “Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues”. Administrative Science Quarterly, no 40.
Giæver, Henrik, 1999: “Knowledge Management in DNV” http://research.dnv.no/Knowman/
March, James G. 1991: “Exploration and Exploitation in organizational Learning”. Organization Science, No. 1, February 1991.
Nonaka, Ikujiro, 1991: “The Knowledge-Creating Company”. Harvard Business Review Reprint 1997. “What is a Learning Organization?” Boston.
Thomsen Jan 1998: The Virtual Team Alliance (VTA): Modeling the Effects of Goal Incongruency in Semi-routine, Fast-paced Project Organizations. PhD dissertation, DNV report 98-2024, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giæver, H.M. (2000). Collecting, storing and utilizing information about improvement opportunities: A discussion of the nontechnological barriers to success. In: Ruhe, G., Bomarius, F. (eds) Learning Software Organizations. SEKE 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1756. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0101422
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0101422
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41430-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44470-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive