Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The enchanting potential of technology: a dialogical case study of enchantment and the Internet

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although user experience is now widely accepted as a central concern in human–computer interaction and interaction design, its conceptual and methodological implications are still being worked out. Enchantment has become emblematic in this process by pointing to the enlivening potential of technology in people-technology relations. As part of an ongoing project to deepen our understanding of enchantment in user experience, this paper presents a case study of one person’s enchantment with their Internet uses. The analysis suggests three salient aspects of this enchantment: responsive crossing of boundaries; dialogue in personal transformation; and the potential endlessness and depths of enchantment. It also suggests that some characteristics of interaction with the particular medium facilitate enchantment: personal control over self-presentation; the paradox of being able to carefully craft meaning from what is normally chaotic; the possibility of finding and constructing personal narratives online; playing in a vast pool of information. Reflection on the results of this single case analysis points to the value for understanding user experience of in-depth single-case analyses that focus on the personal and particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Wright PC, McCarthy JC (2003) Making sense of experience. In: Blythe M, Monk A, Overbeeke C, Wright PC (eds) Funology: from usability to user enjoyment. Kluwer, Dordrecht pp 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy J, Wright P, Wallace J, Dearden A (2006) The experience of enchantment in human–computer interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10:369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakhtin MM (1993) Toward a philosophy of the act. In: Holquist M (ed), Liapunov V (trans). University of Texas Press, Austin

  5. Bakhtin MM (1990) Art and answerability: early philosophical essays. In: Bakhtin MM, Holquist M (eds), Liapunov V (trans). University of Texas Press, Austin

  6. Bakhtin MM (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays. In: Holquist M (ed), Emerson C, Holquist M (trans). University of Texas Press, Austin

  7. Bennett J (2001) The enchantment of modern life: attachments, crossings and ethics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holquist M (1990) Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stake RE (2000) Case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, London, pp 435–454

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yin RK (1994) Case Study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, California

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M (1999) Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K (eds) Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. Sage, London pp 218–239

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JA (2004) Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 1:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willig C (2001) Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Open Press University, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter LA (2004) Relationships as dialogues. Pers Relatsh 11:1–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardiner M (1998) ‘The Incomparable Monster of Solipsism’: Bakhtin and Merleau–Ponty. In: Mayerfeld Bell M, Gardiner M (eds) Bakhtin and the human sciences. Sage, London pp 128–144

    Google Scholar 

  16. Todorov T (1984) Mikhail Bakhtin: the dialogical principle. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wright PC, McCarthy J (2005) The value of the novel in understanding work for design. In: Pirhonen A, Isomaki H, Roast CR, Saarilouma P (eds) Future interaction design. Springer, UK pp 9–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan P, McCarthy J (2005) A dialogical approach to experience-based inquiry. Theory Psychol 15(5):621–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardiner M (2000) Critiques of everyday life. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Mórna Ní Chonchúir & John McCarthy

Authors
  1. Mórna Ní Chonchúir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. John McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mórna Ní Chonchúir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ní Chonchúir, M., McCarthy, J. The enchanting potential of technology: a dialogical case study of enchantment and the Internet. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12, 401–409 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0157-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0157-0

Keywords