Abstract
In this paper, we are interested in real-time flows requiring quantitative and deterministic Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees. We focus more particularly on two QoS parameters: the worst case end-to-end response time and jitter. We consider a non-preemptive scheduling of flows, called fp/dp*, combining fixed priority and dynamic priority established on the first node visited in the network. Examples of such a scheduling are fp/fifo* and fp/edf*. With any flow is associated a fixed priority denoting the importance of the flow from the user point of view. The arbritation between packets having the same fixed priority is done according to their dynamic priority. A classical approach used to compute the worst case end-to-end response time is the holistic one. We show that this approach leads to pessimistic upper bounds and propose the trajectory approach to improve the accuracy of the results. Indeed, the trajectory approach considers the worst case scenarios experienced by a flow along its trajectory. It then eliminates scenarios that cannot occur.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
D. Awduche, J. Malcolm, J. Agogbua and others, Requirements for traffic engineering over MPLS, RFC 2702, IETF (September 1999).
S. Baruah, R. Howell and L. Rosier, Algorithms and complexity concerning the preemptive scheduling of periodic real-time tasks on one processor, Real-Time Systems 2 (1990) 301–324.
J. Y. Le Boudec, P. Thiran, Network calculus: A Theory of Deterministic Queuing Systems for the Internet, LNCS 2050 (Springer-Verlag, September, 2003).
L. George, D. Marinca and P. Minet, A solution for a deterministic Qo S in multimedia systems, International Journal on Computer and Information Science, 1(3) (2001).
J. Liu, Real-Time Systems (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000).
S. Martin and P. Minet, Worst case end-to-end response times for non-preemptive FP/DP* scheduling, INRIA Research Report (December 2004).
S. Martin, P. Minet and L. George, Improving non-preemptive Fixed Priority scheduling with Dynamic Priority as secondary criterion, in: 13th International Conference on Real-Time Systems, RTS'05 (Paris, France April 2005).
A. Parekh and R. Gallager, A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks, IEEE ACM Transactions on Networking (1994).
M. Spuri, Holistic analysis for deadline scheduled real-time distributed systems, INRIA Research Report No 2873, (April 1996).
K. Tindell, A. Burns and A.J. Wellings, Analysis of hard real-time communications, Real-Time Systems 9 (1995) 147–171.
K. Tindell and J. Clark, Holistic schedulability analysis for distributed hard real-time systems, Microprocessors and Microprogramming, Euromicro Jal, vol. 40 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, S., Minet, P. Improving the Analysis of Distributed Non-Preemptive FP/DP* Scheduling with the Trajectory Approach. Telecommun Syst 30, 49–79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-005-4315-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-005-4315-2