Abstract
In “Kant on Existence, Predication, and the Ontological Argument” (1981), Hintikka argues that the so-called “Kant–Frege view” (i.e., the claim that Kant is a forerunner of Frege’s treatment of existence) is wrong, for its supporters erroneously assume that for Kant ‘is’ is ambiguous. In this paper, I will first critically evaluate Hintikka’s arguments against the Kant–Frege view. Then, I will attempt to prove that Kant’s claim that existence is not a real predicate and Frege’s claim that existence is a quantifier are in fact logically interdependent. Finally, I will use the Kant–Frege view in order to reconcile the various claims that Kant makes about existence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Appiah, K.A.: Thinking It Through. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Bennett, J.: Kant’s Dialectics. Cambridge University Press, New York (1974)
Everitt, N.: The Non-Existence of God. Routledge, London (2004)
Floyd, J.: On the use and abuse of logic in philosophy: Kant, Frege and Hintikka on the verb ‘to be’. In: Auxier, E. (ed.) The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Library of Living Philosophers Series, pp. 137–188. Open Court, Chicago (2006)
Forgie, J.: Kant and Frege: existence as a second-level property. Kant-Stud. 91, 165–177 (2000)
Hintikka, J.: Kant on existence, predication, and the ontological argument. Dialectica 35, 127–146 (1981)
Kant, I.: The One Possible Basis for a Demonstration of the Existence of God. In: Treash, G. (tr.) University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1979)
Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. In: Guyer P., Wood A.W. (eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Mion, G.: On Kant’s hidden ambivalence toward existence in his critique of the ontological argument. J. Appl. Log. (forthcoming)
Orenstein, A.: Existence and the Particular Quantifier. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1978)
Russell, B.: On denoting. Mind 14, 479–493 (1905)
Shaffer, J.: Existence, predication and the ontological argument. Mind 71, 307–325 (1962)
Van Cleve, J.: Problems from Kant. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)
Vilko, R., Hintikka, J.: Existence and predication from Aristotle to Kant. Res. 73, 359–377 (2006)
Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. In: Pears, D.F., McGuinness B.F. (tr.) Routledge, London (1974)
Wood, A.W.: Kant’s Rational Theology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mion, G. Hintikka on the “Kant–Frege View”: A Critical Assessment. Log. Univers. 13, 171–178 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-018-0198-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-018-0198-3