Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology Push in AI-Enabled Services: How to Master Technology Integration in Case of Bürokratt

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Estonian program Bürokratt is meant to implement AI-enabled digital public services, beginning as a chatbot and moving toward virtual assistant-based transformation of access to services. This study is meant to explore the planning process and technical integrations required for implementing AI-enabled services for this program. The paper is a qualitative case study based on the triangulation of academic literature, secondary document reviews and semi-structured qualitative interviews. The research findings include the importance of including stakeholders in the design phase, the challenges of complexity in AI and strategic use of open-source components and procurement as it applies to the Bürokratt program. This paper seeks to contribute to the literature on digital transformation and AI in the public sector by examining a detailed case study of the approach to developing and implementing Bürokratt. Future research could include deeper studies on digital transformation processes in different sectors or further development of AI maturity models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(Source: Bürokratt Architect)

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Interview transcripts available on request via email to corresponding author.

References

  1. Di Stefano G, Gambardella A, Verona G. Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: current findings and future research directions. Res Policy. 2012;41(8):1283–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luciano E, Wiedenhöft M. G C 2020 The role of organizational citizenship behavior and strategic alignment in increasing the generation of public value through digital transformation. Proc 13th Int Conf Theory Pract Electron Gov https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Virkar S, Alexopoulos C, Tsekeridou S, Novak AS. A user-centred analysis of decision support requirements in legal informatics. Government Inform Q. 2022;39(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101713.

  4. Distel B. Bringing light into the shadows: a qualitative interview study on citizens’ NonAdoption of eGovernment. Electron J e-Government. 2018;16(2):98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2019;28(2):118–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jöhnk J, Weißert M, Wyrtki K. Ready or not, AI Comes— An interview study of organizational AI readiness factors. Bus Inform Syst Eng. 2020;63(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadiq RB, Safie N, Rahman A, A.H. and, Goudarzi S. Artificial intelligence maturity model: a systematic literature review. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021;7:e661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sikkut S, Eric S. Our Competitive Advantage: Trust and Democracy in the Era of AI + Q&A, Tallinn Digital Summit. 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBzlyikG0Wg. Accessed 20 April, 2024.

  9. Saputro R, Pappel I, Vainsalu H, Lips S, Draheim D. Prerequisites for the Adoption of the X - Road Interoperability and Data Exchange Framework: A Comparative Study, 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2020, pp. 216–222, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096704. (2020).

  10. Pappel I, Tsap V, Draheim D. The e-LocGov Model for Introducing e-Governance into local governments: an Estonian case study. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput. 2021;9(2):597–611. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2019.2910199. 1 April-June 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. UN E-Government survey. Department of Economic and Social Affiairs, Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020. 2020. Accessed April 23, 2024.

  12. Lopes Gonçalves D. Digital Public Services based on open source: Case study on Bürokratt. Joinup European Commission. [Online]. Available: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/document/digital-public-services-based-open-source-case-study-burokratt. (2022).

  13. Sikkut S, Velsberg O, Vaher K. KrattAI the next stage of digital services in Estonia. https://f98cc689-5814-47ec-86b3-db505a7c3978.filesusr.com/ugd/7df26f_b4433364c1e941c9a5a7633f7555bddfpdf.

  14. Vaher K. Next Generation Digital Government Architecture. Republic of Estonia GCIO Office; 2020.

  15. Breaugh J, Rackwitz M, Hammerschmid G. Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK. Government Inform Q. 2023;40(2):p101788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mergel I, Edelmann N, Haug N. Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Government Inform Q. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Noordt C, Misuraca G. Exploratory insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe. Social Sci Comput Rev. 2020;089443932098044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980449.

  18. Baškarada S, Koronios A. Unicorn data scientist: the rarest of breeds. Program. 2017;51(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/prog-07-2016-0053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Labanava A, Dreyling RM, Mortati M, Liiv I, Pappel I. Capacity Building in Government: Towards Developing a Standard for a Functional Specialist in AI for Public Services. FDSE. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8069-5_34.

  20. Fukas P, Rebstadt J, Remark F, Thomas O. Developing an Artificial Intelligence Maturity Model for Auditing (2021). ECIS 2021 Research Papers. 133. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/133.

  21. Burnes B. The origins of Lewin’s three-step model of change. J Appl Behav Sci. 2020;56(1):32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotter JP. Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Rev. 1995;73(2):59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moore GA, McKenna R. Crossing the chasm:Marketing and Selling High-tech Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperBusiness. 1999.

  24. Reddy B, Evans DS. Government Preferences for Promoting Open-Source Software: A Solution in Search of a ProblemMay 21, (2002). Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=313202or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313202.

  25. Guo H, Wang C, Su Z, Wang D. Technology push or market pull? Strategic Orientation in Business Model Design and Digital Startup Performance. J Prod Innov Manage. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brem A, Voigt KI. Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—insights from the German software industry. Technovation. 2009;29(5):351–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Noordt C, Misuraca G. Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence technologies in public services: towards an assessment framework. InProceedings of the 13th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance. 2020 Sep 23 (pp. 8–16).https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428504.

  28. Dreyling RM, Tammet T, Pappel I. Artificial Intelligence Use in e-Government Services: A Systematic Interdisciplinary Literature Review. In International Conference on Future Data and Security Engineering 2022 (pp. 547–559). Springer, Singapore.

  29. Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Kehl I. Governance of artificial intelligence: a risk and guideline-based integrative framework. Government Inform Q. 2022;39(4):101685. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Appelman N, Fathaigh RÒ, van Hoboken JS, Welfare. Risk profiling and Fundamental rights: the case of SyRI in the Netherlands. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com L. 2021;12:257.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Choi LJ. Interrogating structural bias in language technology: focusing on the case of voice chatbots in South Korea. Sustainability. 2022;14(20):13177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hutiri WT, Ding AY. Bias in automated speaker recognition. In proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 Jun 21 (pp. 230–247). https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533089.

  33. Zhiltsova A, Caton S, Mulwa C. Mitigation of unintended biases against non-native English texts in sentiment analysis.

  34. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Halpern BM, Patel T, Scharenborg O. Mitigating bias against non-native accents. InInterspeech 2022 (pp. 3168–3172).

  35. Hernandez L. 2021. Dataset with cases of Artificial Intelligence usage in the public sector available as Open data. Joinup European Commission. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/elise-european-location-interoperability-solutions-e-government/news/143-ai-cases-public-sector-are-available-open-data. (2021).

  36. Layne K, Lee J. Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Government Inform Q. 2001;18(2):122–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lemke F, Taveter K, Erlenheim R, Pappel I, Draheim D, Janssen M. Stage models for moving from E-Government to Smart Government. In: Chugunov A, Khodachek I, Misnikov Y, Trutnev D, editors. Electronic governance and open Society: challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Volume 1135. Cham: Springer; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Bélanger F, Carter L. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2008;17(2):165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shin D. The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: implications for explainable AI. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2021;146:p102551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin RK. Case Study Research Design and Methods. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage (2014).

  41. Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Geyer C. Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. Int J Public Adm. 2019;42(7):596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dreyling RM III, Tammet T, Pappel I. Digital Transformation Insights from an AI Solution in Search of a Problem. InInternational Conference on Future Data and Security Engineering 2023 Nov 17 (pp. 341–351). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

  43. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communication (MKM). Decision support of the unemployment fund OTT. https://www.kratid.ee/kasutuslood. (2020).

  44. National Code repository. Bürokratt Architecture. High level flow https://koodivaramu.eesti.ee/buerokratt/architecture/buerokratt-high-level.

  45. Buerokratt Architecture Github. https://github.com/buerokratt/Architecture/tree/main/docs.

  46. Open Data Portal. Minsitry of Economic Affiars and Communication. Awareness and opinions of Estonian residents about artificial intelligence survey https://avaandmed.eesti.ee/datasets/%22eesti-elanike-teadlikkus-ja-arvamused-tehisintellektist%22-uuringu-alusandmed.

Download references

Funding

ICT Programme support of corresponding author as determined in FP7 in form of scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Dreyling III.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This declaration is not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dreyling III, R., Tammet, T. & Pappel, I. Technology Push in AI-Enabled Services: How to Master Technology Integration in Case of Bürokratt. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 738 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03064-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03064-0

Keywords

Navigation