Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Advanced Deep Learning Paradigms for Precise Brain Tumor Categorization

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current developments in medical image processing have relied on deep learning. One potential use for deep learning is to improve brain tumor categorization. The primary goal of this work is to create deep learning models that can detect brain cancer in MRI data. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transfer learning are two recently discovered alternatives to conventional tumor classification methods. We designed these approaches to address the concerns mentioned above. One of the product's major flaws is its inability to recognize and make broad judgments about human qualities. The development of deep learning models for brain tumor detection facilitated achieving the stated goal. In addition, we analyzed CNN designs and transfer learning approaches, investigated data augmentation strategies to increase model performance, and examined classic machine learning processes. These similarities happened together. Deep learning models, particularly CNNs, outperform more traditional approaches in terms of accuracy, durability, and processing resource efficiency. In this scenario, it is clear how deep learning may help with the identification and treatment of brain cancers. This research project aims to provide a unique deep learning technique for brain tumor categorization. This approach combines many feature extraction methods with modern model designs. Overall, the suggested method outperformed the alternatives. This collection provides several unique style alternatives. ResNet, VGG, DenseNet, and many more architectures are among the many that fall into this category. Trial results comparing several deep learning approaches corroborated these conclusions. When compared to previous models that followed the suggested technique, the new model performed better on all examined features. The following characteristics were considered: AUC-ROC, recall, accuracy, precision, F1 score, and F1. The findings revealed an F1 score of 0.90, accuracy, precision, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.95, a 0.88 recall rate, and 0.90 accuracy and precision. According to the study results, the proposed strategy enhances the reliability of tumor classification. According to the research, complicated feature extraction and model update procedures are required for improved classification performance. These discoveries have inspired changes in clinical practice, perhaps leading to improved patient outcomes and more accurate diagnoses. The data may yield insights beyond these two assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Rehman IR, Xu G. Federated learning for privacy preservation of healthcare data from smartphone-based side-channel attacks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022;1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar V, Kumar KP. “ConvNet based detection and segmentation of brain tumor from MR images,” In: Proceedings of the 2021 Second International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Bengaluru, India, Dec. 2021

  3. Rehman MA, Khan T, Saba Z, Mehmood UT, Ayesha N. Microscopic brain tumor detection and classification using 3D CNN and feature selection architecture. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(1):133–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Younis Thanoun M, Yaseen MT. A comparative study of Parkinson disease diagnosis in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, London, UK, 9–11 Oct 2020; pp. 23–28.

  5. Chintalapudi N, Battineni G, Hossain MA, Amenta F. Cascaded deep learning frameworks in contribution to the detection of Parkinson’s disease. Bioengineering. 2022;9:116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quan C, Ren K, Luo Z. A deep learning based method for Parkinson’s disease detection using dynamic features of speech. IEEE Access. 2021;9:10239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahadure NB, Ray AK, Thethi HP. Image analysis for MRI based brain tumor detection and feature extraction using biologically inspired BWT and SVM. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2017;9749108:12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma YW, Chen JL, Chen YJ, Lai YH. Explainable deep learning architecture for early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Soft Comput. 2023;27:2729–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy V, et al. Detection of sleep apnea through heart rate signal using Convolutional Neural Network. Int J Pharm Res. 2020;12(4):4829–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abunadi I. Deep and hybrid learning of MRI diagnosis for early detection of the progression stages in Alzheimer’s disease. Connect Sci. 2022;34:2395–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitehead S, Li S, Ademuyiwa FO, Wahl RL, Dehdashti F, Shoghi KI. Co-clinical FDG-PET radiomic signature in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):550–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali S, Li J, Pei Y, Khurram R, Rehman K, Mahmood T. A comprehensive survey on brain tumor Diagnosis using deep learning and emerging hybrid techniques with multi-modal MR image. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2022;1:3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roy V, Khaparkar S, Tripathi P. "An Effective identification of flavor complaint by adaptive analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signal," 2023 1st International Conference on Innovations in High Speed Communication and Signal Processing (IHCSP), BHOPAL, India, 2023, pp. 25–28, https://doi.org/10.1109/IHCSP56702.2023.10127108.

  14. Habib T, Boulila S, Koubaa W, et al. A survey on COVID-19 impact in the healthcare domain: worldwide market implementation, applications, security and privacy issues, challenges and future prospects. Complex Intell Syst. 2022;9(1):1027–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abdullah SM, Abbas T, Bashir MH, Khaja IA, Ahmad M, Soliman NF, El-Shafai W. Deep transfer learning based Parkinson’s disease detection using optimized feature selection. IEEE Access. 2023;11:3511–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stalin S, Roy V, Shukla PK, Zaguia A, Khan MM, Shukla PK, Jain A. A machine learning-based big EEG data artifact detection and wavelet-based removal: an empirical approach. Math Probl Eng. 2021;2021:11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2942808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katta K, Katta RB. An automated brain tumor detection and classification from MRI images using machine learning techniques with IoT. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;2021:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chithambaram T, Perumal K. Automatic detection of brain tumor from magnetic resonance images (MRI) using ANN based feature extraction. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol. 2021;12(1):109–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roy V, Shukla S. Designing efficient blind source separation methods for EEG motion artifact removal based on statistical evaluation. Wireless Pers Commun. 2019;108:1311–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06470-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asiri AA, Shaf A, Ali T, Aamir M, Irfan M, Alqahtani S, Mehdar KM, Halawani HT, Alghamdi AH, Alshamrani AFA, et al. Brain tumor detection and classification using fine-tuned CNN with ResNet50 and U-Net model: a study on TCGA-LGG and TCIA dataset for MRI applications. Life. 2023;13:1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saini R, Semwal P, Jaware TH. Brain tumor classification using VGG-16 and MobileNetV2 deep learning techniques on Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI). In: Patel KK, Santosh KC, Patel A, Ghosh A, editors. Soft computing and its engineering applications. icSoftComp 2022. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 300–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ZainEldin H, Gamel SA, El-Kenawy EM, Alharbi AH, Khafaga DS, Ibrahim A, Talaat FM. Brain tumor detection and classification using deep learning and sine-cosine fitness Grey Wolf optimization. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;10(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010018. (PMID: 36671591; PMCID: PMC9854739).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmmed S, Podder P, Mondal MRH, Rahman SMA, Kannan S, Hasan MJ, Rohan A, Prosvirin AE. enhancing brain tumor classification with transfer learning across multiple classes: an in-depth analysis. BioMedInformatics. 2023;3:1124–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics3040068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Swamy BN, Dedeepya P, Sekhar JC, Pratap VK, Ananya K, Sindhura S. "Brain tumor detection using RCNN and MobileNet," In: 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS), Coimbatore, India, 2023, pp. 657–662, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCSS57650.2023.10169423.

  25. Goutham V, Sameerunnisa A, Babu S, Prakash TB. "Brain tumor classification using efficientNet-B0 model," In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India, 2022, pp. 2503–2509, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACITE53722.2022.9823526.

  26. Amran GA, Alsharam MS, Blajam AOA, Hasan AA, Alfaifi MY, Amran MH, Gumaei A, Eldin SM. Brain tumor classification and detection using hybrid deep tumor network. Electronics. 2022;11:3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Babu Vimala B, Srinivasan S, Mathivanan SK, et al. Detection and classification of brain tumor using hybrid deep learning models. Sci Rep. 2023;13:23029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50505-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Daisy E. Imbaquingo-Esparza: Consumption and design of study, Acquisition of the Analysis, Miguel Botto-Tobar: Interpretation of the data, Drafting and Investigation, José G. Jacome-Leon: Formalization an editing, Marcelo Zambrano-Vizuete: Review and investigation and conceptualization and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisy E. Imbaquingo-Esparza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imbaquingo-Esparza, D.E., Botto-Tobar, M., Jacome-Leon, J.G. et al. Exploring Advanced Deep Learning Paradigms for Precise Brain Tumor Categorization. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 965 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03228-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03228-y

Keywords

Navigation