Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simultaneous Allocation of Electric Vehicle Charging Station and Power Filters in Power Distribution Network Using Marine Predators Algorithm

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in electric vehicle sales has necessitated more charging stations. However, the converters in these stations impact the power quality of the network by generating harmonics, which must be maintained within specified limits according to IEEE 519 standard. Hence, this paper focuses on optimal allocation of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs) while ensuring the satisfaction of power quality and other constraints of the network. The power filters are also placed optimally, keeping their installation costs reasonable, when optimal allocation of EVCSs alone does not resolve the power quality issues. The problem is formulated as a multi-objective problem. The effectiveness of the proposed mathematical model is validated on a practical 40-bus superimposed road and distribution network. To perform the power quality analysis, harmonic spectrum data of a practical EVCS is captured with the help of a power quality analyzer. The optimization is conducted using the marine predator algorithm (MPA) in MATLAB. The best non-dominated solution is identified using the interactive fuzzy satisfying (IFS) method. The outcomes show that the proposed approach is effective and is capable of evaluating the location of charging stations for any practical distribution network, keeping power quality constraints within limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The required input data is provided in the manuscript and the resultant output data is also included in this manuscript.

References

  1. Golla NK, Sudabattula SK, Suresh V. Optimal placement of electric vehicle charging station in distribution system using meta-heuristic techniques. Math Model Eng Probl. 2022;9:60–6. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.090108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta R, Verma P, Srinivasan D, Yang J. Double-layered intelligent energy management for optimal integration of plug-in electric vehicles into distribution systems. Appl Energy. 2019;233:146–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad F, Iqbal A, Ashraf I, Marzband M, Khan I. Placement of electric vehicle fast charging stations in distribution network considering power loss, land cost, and electric vehicle population. Energ Source Part A. 2022;44:1693–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2055233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fokui WST, Saulo MJ, Ngoo L. Optimal placement of electric vehicle charging stations in a distribution network with randomly distributed rooftop photovoltaic systems. IEEE Access. 2021;9:132397–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaidi I, Oulamara A, Idoumghar L, Basset M. Electric vehicle charging scheduling problem: heuristics and metaheuristic approaches. Sn Comput Sci. 2023;4:283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01708-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rigas ES, Tsompanidis KS. Algorithms to manage congestion in large-scale mobility-on-demand schemes that use electric vehicles. Sn Comput Sci. 2021;2:292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Micari S, Polimeni A, Napoli G, Andaloro L, Antonucci V. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning in a road network. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;80:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He J, Yang H, Tang TQ, Huang HJ. An optimal charging station location model with the consideration of electric vehicle’s driving range. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2018;86:641–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu L, Zhang Y, Da C, Huang Z, Wang M. Optimal allocation of distributed generation and electric vehicle charging stations based on intelligent algorithm and bi-level programming. Int Trans Electr. 2020;30:12366. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shabbar R, Kasasbeh A, Ahmed MM. Charging station allocation for electric vehicle network using stochastic modeling and grey wolf optimization. Sustainability. 2021;13:3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andrade J, Ochoa LF, Freitas W. Regional-scale allocation of fast charging stations: travel times and distribution system reinforcements. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2020;14:4225–33. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yi Z, Liu XC, Wei R. Electric vehicle demand estimation and charging station allocation using urban informatics. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2022;106:3314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong HP. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliab. 1998;59(3):261–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00071-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pal A, Bhattacharya A, Chakraborty AK. Allocation of electric vehicle charging station considering uncertainties. Sustain Energy Grids Netw. 2021;25:100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2020.100422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pal A, Bhattacharya A, Chakraborty AK. Placement of public fast-charging station and solar distributed generation with battery energy storage in distribution network considering uncertainties and traffic congestion. J Energy Storage. 2021;41:102939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Das S, Pal A, Acharjee P, Chakraborty AK, Bhattacharya A. Multilevel planning for smart charging scheduling for on-road electric vehicles considering seasonal uncertainties. In: Bohre AK, Chaturvedi P, Kolhe ML, Singh SN (eds) Planning of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems, Electric Vehicles and Microgrid. Energy Systems in Electrical Engineering. Springer; 2022. pp. 649–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0979-5_25.

  17. Wen F, Li Q, Liu L, Li R, Wu T. Research on harmonic influence of electric vehicle wireless charging system on power grid. In: 2019 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia). IEEE; 2019, pp. 4128-4131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2019.8881333.

  18. Megha A, Mahendran N, Elizabeth R. Analysis of harmonic contamination in electrical grid due to electric vehicle charging. In: 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). IEEE; 2020, pp. 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214096.

  19. Pandi VR, Zeineldin HH, Xiao W. Determining optimal location and size of distributed generation resources considering harmonic and protection coordination limits. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2012;28:1245–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2209687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferreyra D, Sarmiento C, Reineri C. Harmonic state estimation on a radial distribution system with distributed generation. IEEE Lat Am Trans. 2013;11:499–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2013.6502852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdelrahman S, Milanović JV. Practical approaches to assessment of harmonics along radial distribution feeders. IEEE Trans Power Deliv. 2019;34:1184–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2019.2901245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milovanović M, Radosavljević J, Perović B. A backward/forward sweep power flow method for harmonic polluted radial distribution systems with distributed generation units. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2020;30:12310. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F II, I.: IEEE recommended practices and requirements for harmonic control in electrical power systems. In: in IEEE Std 519–2014 (Revision of IEEE Std 519–1992). New York, NY, USA. IEEE; 1993, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2014.6826459

  24. Napoles J, Leon IJ, Portillo R, Franquelo GL, Aguirre MA. Selective harmonic mitigation technique for high-power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2009;57:2315–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2026759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Milovanović M, Radosavljević J, Klimenta D, Perović B. GA-based approach for optimal placement and sizing of passive power filters to reduce harmonics in distorted radial distribution systems. Electr Eng. 2019;101:787–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-019-00805-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Widagdo RS, Setyadjit K Wardah IA. Analysis and mitigation of harmonics distortion with optimization capacitor banks and single-tuned passive filters. Jambura J Electr Electron Eng. 2023;5:204–9. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjeee.v5i2.19016.

  27. Narthana S, Gnanavadivel J. Power quality analysis of interleaved cuk configuration-based interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller for battery charging in electric vehicles. Arab J Sci Eng. 2024;49:6259–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08189-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abou El-Ela A, Allam SM, Mubarak AA, El-Sehiemy RA. Harmonic mitigation by optimal allocation of tuned passive filter in distribution system. Energy Power Eng. 2022;14:291–312. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2022.147016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zaveri N, Chudasama A. Control strategies for harmonic mitigation and power factor correction using shunt active filter under various source voltage conditions. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2012;42:661–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee TL, Hu SH. An active filter with resonant current control to suppress harmonic resonance in a distribution power system. IEEE J IEEE Trans Emerg Sel Topics Power Electr. 2015;4:198–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2015.2478149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lakum A, Mahajan V. Optimal placement and sizing of multiple active power filters in radial distribution system using grey wolf optimizer in presence of nonlinear distributed generation. Electr Power Syst Res. 2019;173:281–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khudher SM, Aris IB, Othman M, Mailah N. Output-input hybrid passive filter design for electric vehicle charging station. Al Rafidain Eng J. 2021;26:132–42. https://doi.org/10.33899/rengj.2021.129599.1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nacu RC, Fodorean D. Harmonics mitigation in DC based charging stations for EVs. In: 2021 10th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), IEEE; 2021, pp. 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA52334.2021.9598559.

  34. Alame D, Azzouz M, Kar N. Assessing and mitigating impacts of electric vehicle harmonic currents on distribution systems. Energies. 2022;13:3257. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH. Marine predators algorithm: a nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;152:113377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mugemanyi S, Qu Z, Rugema FX, Dong Y, Wang L, Bananeza C, Nshimiyimana A, Mutabazi E. Marine predators algorithm: a comprehensive review. Mach Learn Appl. 2023;12:100471.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chang GW, Chu SY, Wang HL. An improved backward/forward sweep load flow algorithm for radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2007;22:882–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brahmachary R, Bhattacharya A, Ahmed I. Allocation of active power filter in distribution network considering nonlinear loads. In: 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control (STPEC), IEEE; 2021, pp. 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1109/CATCON56237.2022.10077694.

  39. Mkahl R. Contribution à la modélisation, au dimensionnement et à la gestion des flux énergétiques d’un système de recharge de véhicules électriques: étude de l’interconnexion avec le réseau électrique. Doctoral dissertation, Belfort-Montbéliard, 2015.

  40. Mehta R, Srinivasan D, Khambadkone AM, Yang J, Trivedi A. Smart charging strategies for optimal integration of plug-in electric vehicles within existing distribution system infrastructure. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2016;9:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2550559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong G, Ma J, Wei R, Haycox J. Electric vehicle charging point placement optimisation by exploiting spatial statistics and maximal coverage location models. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2019;67:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Park B, Lee J, Yoo H, Jang G. Harmonic mitigation using passive harmonic filters: case study in a steel mill power system. Energies. 2021;14:2278. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mondal S, Bhattacharya A, Dey SH. Multi-objective economic emission load dispatch solution using gravitational search algorithm and considering wind power penetration. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2013;44:282–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng MY, Prayogo D. Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct. 2014;139:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim. 1997;11:341–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Das S, Acharjee P, Bhattacharya A. Charging scheduling of electric vehicle incorporating grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-grid technology considering in smart grid. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2020;57:1688–702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2020.3041808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Conover WJ, Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley 1999. ISBN: 978–0471160687.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank National Institute of Technology Durgapur and Ministry of Education (MoE), Government of India for their support for successful completion of the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupali Brahmachary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brahmachary, R., Bhattacharya, A. & Ahmed, I. Simultaneous Allocation of Electric Vehicle Charging Station and Power Filters in Power Distribution Network Using Marine Predators Algorithm. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 938 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03311-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03311-4

Keywords

Navigation