Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Operative Expectation of Parkinson’s Ailment Using a Hybrid Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Systems

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human biosignals can be used to detect early signs of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Electroencephalography (EEG) measures brain signals, while electromyography (EMG) measures muscle signals, both of which are useful in studying functional and neuronal changes in Parkinson’s patients. Researchers extracted various time and frequency domain features from EEG and EMG signals of early-stage PD patients and control subjects (CS) to identify motor symptoms. A diagnostic tool based on a mathematical model utilizing an artificial neural network (ANN) and a graphical user interface was developed. The ANN-based classifier, using the EEG and EMG features as inputs, accurately identified early-stage PD patients from control subjects with a classification rate of approximately 100%. The combination of EEG and EMG characteristics resulted in the highest recognition rate of 99.1%. This model demonstrated near-perfect accuracy, with an R-value of 0.9976, indicating its precision. Additionally, it achieved a low validation mean square error of 0.0068 and an elapsed time of 1.32 s. Studies show that combining EEG and EMG features as input parameters effectively distinguishes PD patients from control subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Aktürk T, Yıldırım E, Hanoğlu L, Yılmaz NH, Yener GG, Güntekin B. A zongitudinal investigation of event related eeg brain oscillations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Anatomy: International Journal of Experimental & Clinical Anatomy; 2019. p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chakraborty S, Aich S, Sim J-S, Jang D-J, Joo M-i, Kim H-C. Detection of neurodegenerative disease in ageing adults: a systematic review. TEST Eng Manage. 2020;82:8982–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roy V, Shukla PK, Gupta AK, Goel V, Shukla PK, Shukla S. Taxonomy on EEG artifacts removal methods, issues, and Healthcare Applications. J Organizational End User Comput (JOEUC). 2021;33(1):19–46. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2021010102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiang J, Wang ZJ, McKeown MJ. A multiblock pls model of cortico-cortical and corticomuscular interactions in parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage. 2012;63(3):1498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy V, Shukla S, Designing Efficient Blind Source Separation Methods for EEG Motion Artifact Removal Based on Statistical Evaluation. Wirel Pers Commun. 2019;108:1311–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06470-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu C, Wang X, Cai L, Zhang L, Wang J, Liu C, Zhu X. Spatiotemporal eeg microstate analysis in drug-free patients with parkinson’s disease. Volume 25. NeuroImage: Clinical; 2020. p. 102132.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roy V, Shukla S, Effective EEG, Motion Artifacts Elimination Based on Comparative Interpolation Analysis. Wirel Pers Commun. 2017;97:6441–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4846-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Er O, Cetin O, Bascil MS, Temurtas F. A comparative study on parkinson’s disease diagnosis using neural networks and artificial immune system. J Med Imaging Health Inf. 2016;6(1):264–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geman O, Chiuchisan I, Covasa M, Eftaxias K, Sanei S, Madeira JGF, Boloy RAM. (2016, 29 Aug.-2 Sept. 2016). Joint eeg — emg signal processing for identification of the mental tasks in patients with neurological diseases. Paper presented at the 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

  10. Gürüler H. A novel diagnosis system for parkinson’s disease using complex-valued artificial neural network with k-means clustering feature weighting method. Neural Comput Appl. 2017;28(7):1657–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2142-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy V, Shukla S. A NLMS based Approach for artifacts removal in Multichannel EEG signals with ICA and double density Wavelet transform. 2015 Fifth Int Conf Communication Syst Netw Technol. 2015;461–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2015.61.

  12. Herman T, Shema-Shiratzky S, Arie L, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Depressive symptoms may increase the risk of the future development of freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: findings from a 5-year prospective study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;60:98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vandana Roy S, Shukla PK, Shukla P, Rawat. Gaussian Elimination-Based Novel Canonical Correlation Analysis Method for EEG Motion Artifact Removal, Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 9674712, 11 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9674712

  14. Hirschauer TJ, Adeli H, Buford JA. Computer-aided diagnosis of parkinson’s disease using enhanced probabilistic neural network. J Med Syst. 2015;39(11):179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0353-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Y-Z, Chang F-Y, Liu W-C, Chuang Y-F, Chuang L-L, Chang. Y.-J. (2017).

  16. Fatigue. and Muscle strength involving walking speed in parkinson’s disease: insights for developing rehabilitation strategy for pd. Neural plasticity; 2017.

  17. Jackson N, Cole SR, Voytek B, Swann NC. (2019). Characteristics of waveform shape in parkinson’s disease detected with scalp electroencephalography. eNeuro, 6(3).

  18. Shalini Stalin V, Roy PK, Shukla A, Zaguia MM, Khan PK, Shukla A, Jain AM. Learning-Based Big EEG Data Artifact Detection and Wavelet-Based Removal: An Empirical Approach, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 2942808, 11 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2942808

  19. Joshi D, Khajuria A, Joshi P. An automatic non-invasive method for parkinson’s disease classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;145:135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang SY, Bang M, Hong JY, Oh J, Kim JS, Han YM, Shin N-Y. Neural and dopaminergic correlates of fatigue in parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm. 2020;127(3):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-019-02130-9.

  21. Sharma M. Design of brain-computer interface-based classification model for mining mental state of COVID-19 afflicted mariner’s. Int Marit Health. 2020;71(4):298–300. https://doi.org/10.5603/IMH.2020.0052. PMID: 33394498.

  22. Ravesa Akhter SA, Sofi. Precision agriculture using IoT data analytics and machine learning, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, Volume 34, Issue 8, Part B, 2022,Pp 5602–18, ISSN 1319–1578, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.05.013.

  23. Da Silva DA, Branco NFLC, de Andrade Mesquita LS, Branco HMGC, de Alencar Barreto G. Electromyography and dynamometry in the prediction of risk of falls in the elderly using machine learning tools. Biomed Signal Process Contr. 2024;88:105635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105635.

  24. Zhang J, Zhou W, Yu H, Wang T, Wang X, Liu L, Wen Y. Prediction of Parkinson’s Disease using machine learning methods. Biomol. 2023;13(12):1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13121761.

  25. Subba R, Bhoi AK. Feature extraction and classification between control and Parkinson’s using EMG signal. In: Cognitive Informatics and Soft Computing: Proceeding of CISC 2019. Singapore: Springer; 2020. pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1451-7_5.

  26. Soni M, Singh AK, Babu KS, Kumar S. Convolutional neural network based CT scan classification method for COVID-19 test validation. Smart Health 2022;25:100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100296

  27. Athithan S, Sachi S, Singh AK. Ultrasound-based ovarian cysts detection with improved machine-learning techniques and stage classification using enhanced classifiers. SN Comp Sci. 2023;4(5):571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01973-0.

  28. Devarajan JP, Sreedharan VR, Narayanamurthy G. Decision making in health care diagnosis: evidence from Parkinson’s disease via hybrid machine learning. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2021;70(8):2719–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3096862.

  29. Hoq M, Uddin MN, Park SB. Vocal feature extraction-based artificial intelligent model for Parkinson’s disease detection. Diagnostics 2021;11(6):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11061076.

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Senthil Athithan: Consumption and design of study, Acquisition of the Analysis, Savya Sachi: Interpretation of the data, Drafting and Investigation, Formalization an editing, Ajay Kumar Singh: Review and investigation, conceptualization and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Savya Sachi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athithan, S., Sachi, S. & Singh, A.K. An Operative Expectation of Parkinson’s Ailment Using a Hybrid Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Systems. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 1146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03404-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03404-0

Keywords

Navigation