Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mental Disorders Prognosis and Predictions Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: a Comprehensive Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mental diseases are a serious worldwide problem that requires precise and effective diagnosis techniques. This paper provides an in-depth overview and analysis of the latest developments in the application of deep learning techniques to identify mental illnesses. The key objective of this investigation is to evaluate the potential of DL algorithms in improving the precision and promptness of mental health diagnoses, which will lead to more focused and specific treatment strategies. The study discusses the present situation of mental health categorization and the limitations associated with traditional diagnostic methodologies. The dataset utilized in this study includes six types of mental health disorders: borderline personality disorder (BPD), depression, anxiety, bipolar, mental illness, and schizophrenia, and it is made up of 70,000 Reddit posts written by diverse people suffering from the mental disorder. The suggested study’s methodology makes use of text dataset standardization techniques to improve classifier performance. In the suggested investigation, we also discovered that min–max scaling enhances the performance of several classifiers by 26% to 40% compared to a conventional technique. We have utilized min–max scaling to transfer the features of the dataset to bring them to a similar scale. Later, we trained a total of eleven classifiers using the dataset and analyzed their performance using various performance measure parameters. The key findings are combined to demonstrate the ability of machine learning models to discriminate between various mental disorders, such as BPD, depression, anxiety, mental illness, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. In the presented study, we found that our proposed embedding GRU dense model achieves superior performance, demonstrating an accuracy of 92.59% and a training loss of 0.20. This performance surpasses that of conventional deep learning models, including LSTM, GRU, RNN, and other baseline models. Our experiments showed that the GRU dense model effectively captures complex patterns, leading to significant improvements in accuracy and loss metrics compared to widely used architectures. Based on the findings, the proposed classifiers can help medical professionals make more precise identifications of mental illnesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Burgess PM, Pirkis JE, Slade TN, et al. Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 national survey of mental health and wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670902970858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu J, Shi M. A hybrid feature selection and ensemble approach to identify depressed users in online social media. Front Psychol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association D, Association AP, et al. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. DC: American psychiatric association Washington; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Guha Martin. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Ref Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/rr-10-2013-0256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mental health atlas (2020) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021

  6. Rivera MJ, Teruel MA, Maté A, Trujillo J. Diagnosis and prognosis of mental disorders by means of EEG and deep learning: a systematic mapping study. Artif Intell Rev. 2021;55(2):1209–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09986-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrew J, Rudra M, Eunice J, Belfin RV. Artificial intelligence in adolescents mental health disorder diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Front Public Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soufineyestani M, Dowling D, Khan A. Electroencephalography (EEG) technology applications and available devices. Appl Sci. 2020;10:7453. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mumtaz W, Vuong PL, Xia L, et al. An EEG-based machine learning method to screen alcohol use disorder. Cogn Neurodyn. 2016;11:161–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-016-9416-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khondoker M, Dobson R, Skirrow C, et al. A comparison of machine learning methods for classification using simulation with multiple real data examples from mental health studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25:1804–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213502437.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Su C, Xu Z, Pathak J, Wang F. Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review. Trans Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0780-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vázquez MA, Maghsoudi A, Mariño IP. An interpretable machine learning method for the detection of schizophrenia using EEG signals. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.652662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srividya M, Mohanavalli S, Bhalaji N. Behavioral modeling for mental health using machine learning algorithms. J Med Syst. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0934-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho G, Yim J, Choi Y, et al. Review of machine learning algorithms for diagnosing mental illness. Psychiatry Investig. 2019;16:262–9. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2018.12.21.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Acharya UR, Oh SL, Hagiwara Y, et al. A deep convolutional neural network model to classify heartbeats. Comput Biol Med. 2017;89:389–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Hassan A, Al-Dossari H. Detection of hate speech in Arabic tweets using deep learning. Multimed Syst. 2021;28:1963–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-020-00742-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gkotsis G, Oellrich A, Velupillai S, et al. Characterisation of mental health conditions in social media using informed deep learning. Sci Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chancellor S, Baumer EPS, De Choudhury M. Who is the “human” in human-centered machine learning: the case of predicting mental health from social media. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2019;3:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wongkoblap A, Vadillo MA, Curcin V. Researching mental health disorders in the era of social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19: e228. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shatte ABR, Hutchinson DM, Teague SJ. Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications. Psychol Med. 2019;49:1426–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291719000151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J, Lee J, Park E, Han J. A deep learning model for detecting mental illness from user content on social media. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68764-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shim M, Hwang H-J, Kim D-W, et al. Machine-learning-based diagnosis of schizophrenia using combined sensor-level and source-level EEG features. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:314–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mumtaz W, Ali SSA, Yasin MAM, Malik AS. A machine learning framework involving EEG-based functional connectivity to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;56:233–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1685-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maniruzzaman Md, Hasan MdAM, Asai N, Shin J. Optimal channels and features selection based ADHD detection from EEG signal using statistical and machine learning techniques. IEEE Access. 2023;11:33570–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3264266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Massullo C, Carbone GA, Farina B, et al. Dysregulated brain salience within a triple network model in high trait anxiety individuals: a pilot EEG functional connectivity study. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020;157:61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen LL, Magdy W, Wolters MK. The effect of user psychology on the content of social media posts: originality and transitions matter. Front Psychol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Amanat A, Rizwan M, Javed AR, et al. Deep learning for depression detection from textual data. Electronics (Basel). 2022;11:676. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qureshi MNI, Oh J, Cho D, et al. Multimodal discrimination of schizophrenia using hybrid weighted feature concatenation of brain functional connectivity and anatomical features with an extreme learning machine. Front Neuroinform. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Newson JJ, Thiagarajan TC. EEG frequency bands in psychiatric disorders: a review of resting state studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khare SK, Bajaj V, Acharya UR. SPWVD-CNN for automated detection of schizophrenia patients using EEG signals. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2021;70:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2021.3070608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Y, Wu W, Toll RT, et al. Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;5:309–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00614-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Japaridze G, Loeckx D, Buckinx T, et al. Automated detection of absence seizures using a wearable electroencephalographic device: a phase 3 validation study and feasibility of automated behavioral testing. Epilepsia. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ansari G, Garg M, Saxena C. Data augmentation for mental health classification on social media. arXiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.10064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ji S, Zhang T, Ansari L, Fu J, Tiwari P, Cambria E. MentalBERT: publicly available pretrained language models for mental healthcare. arXiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2110.15621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kunst H, Lobbestael J, Candel I, Batink T. Early maladaptive schemas and their relation to personality disorders: a correlational examination in a clinical population. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020;27:837–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qayyum R, Afzal H, Mahmood K, Iltaf N (2023) Detection and Analysis of Mental Health Illness using Social Media. In: 2023 International Conference on Communication Technologies (ComTech). IEEE

  37. F. Heimerl, S. Lohmann, S. Lange and T. Ertl, (2024) "Word Cloud Explorer: Text Analytics Based on Word Clouds," 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, pp. 1833–1842, https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.231.

  38. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2024). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition with Language Models (3rd ed.).

  39. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9:1735–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou C, Sun C, Liu Z, Lau FCM (2015) A C-LSTM Neural Network for Text Classification

  41. Sak H, Senior A, Beaufays F (2014) Long Short-Term Memory Based Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition

  42. Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi AJ, et al. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J Big Data. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Islam MdZ, Islam MdM, Asraf A. A combined deep CNN-LSTM network for the detection of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) using X-ray images. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;20: 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Graves A, Jaitly N, Mohamed A (2013) Hybrid speech recognition with Deep Bidirectional LSTM. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. IEEE

  45. Yu Y, Si X, Hu C, Zhang J. A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput. 2019;31:1235–70. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01199.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Agarap AF (2017) A Neural Network Architecture Combining Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) for Intrusion Detection in Network Traffic Data. https://doi.org/10.4855/ARXIV.1709.03082

  47. Li X, Yuan A, Lu X. Multi-modal gated recurrent units for image description. Multimed Tools Appl. 2018;77:29847–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5856-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou G-B, Wu J, Zhang C-L, Zhou Z-H. Minimal gated unit for recurrent neural networks. Int J Autom Comput. 2016;13:226–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-016-1006-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Demir F. DeepCoroNet: a deep LSTM approach for automated detection of COVID-19 cases from chest X-ray images. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;103: 107160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lynn HM, Pan SB, Kim P. A deep bidirectional GRU network model for biometric electrocardiogram classification based on recurrent neural networks. IEEE Access. 2019;7:145395–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2939947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar Y, Koul A, Mahajan S. A deep learning approaches and fastai text classification to predict 25 medical diseases from medical speech utterances, transcription and intent. Soft comput. 2022;26:8253–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07261-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanna GP, Kumar SJKJ, Kumar Y, et al. Author correction: advanced deep learning techniques for early disease prediction in cauliflower plants. Sci Rep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47732-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur Changela.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaushik, P., Bansal, K., Kumar, Y. et al. Mental Disorders Prognosis and Predictions Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: a Comprehensive Study. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 1048 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03416-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03416-w

Keywords

Navigation