Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Expert and Planning Module of an Intelligent Pedagogical Agent for the Development of Critical Thinking

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical thinking, essential in contemporary education, has been the subject of research, which has focused on the creation of pedagogical strategies to promote and strengthen this skill in students. This study focused on designing an Intelligent Tutor System to develop this type of higher order thinking in university students. It was divided into two phases: design of the expert module, which devised learning paths and explored an algorithm, and the planning module, which covered automated planning, plan customization, outcome evaluation and testing. The findings highlight creating a didactic model of the learning path and validating a planning algorithm, called the Learning Progress Algorithm, as a formal, automated approach to improving critical thinking skills. The conclusion highlights the ability of the planning module, supported by the algorithm, to adjust to individual learner progress, which enables educational personalization and has practical implications for optimizing critical thinking in challenging contexts. This integrative approach reflects the synergy between educational technology and critical skills development within educational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Source Code of Intelligent Algorithms: This repository contains the source code for each of the algorithms described in the results of the study: https://github.com/APIP-CECAR/planner/blob/main/domain.pddl, https://github.com/APIP-CECAR/planner/blob/main/problem.pddl. Algorithm Validation: To assess the effectiveness of the proposed intelligent tutoring system in personalized learning path generation, an evaluation was conducted in a secondary education setting: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/C358072.2023.10436195. Didactic Model Designed to Promote the Development of Critical Thinking: The following study was the first phase of the research, which served as the conceptual basis for the implementation of the algorithms: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100207.

References

  1. Aleven V, McLaren BM, Sewall J, van Velsen M, Popescu O, Demi S, Ringenberg M, Koedinger KR. Example-tracing tutors: intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2016;26(1):224–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, & Krathwohl. (2016). Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. 1–7. https://quincycollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf

  3. Behrooz M, Tiffany B. Evolution of an intelligent deductive logic tutor using data-driven elements. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2017;27(1):5–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40593-016-0112-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beverley P, Woolf B, Aïmeur E, Nkambou R, Lajoie S. Intelligent tutoring systems: 9th International Conference, ITS 2008 Montreal, Canada, June 2007;23–27, 2008: proceedings.

  5. CaicedoLópez H. Neuroeducación Una propuesta educativaen el aula de clase. 1st ed. Ediciones de la U; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonell, J. (1970). AI in CAI: An Artificial-Intelligence Approach to Computer-Assisted Instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11(4), 190–202. https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:xr633ts6369/xr633ts6369.pdf

  7. Caro, M. F., Quitian, L., Giraldo, J. C., & Lengua-Cantero, C. (2023). A Formal Model for Personalized Learning Path using Artificial Intelligence for Instructional Planning with a Focus on 21st-Century Skills and Environmental Awareness. 2023 IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference (C3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/C358072.2023.10436195

  8. D’Aniello G, Gaeta A, Gaeta M, Tomasiello S. Self-regulated learning with approximate reasoning and situation awareness. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2018;9(1):151–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0423-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Sánchez, M. A. (1995). Desarrollo de habilidades de pensamiento: procesos básicos del pensamiento (Trillas, Ed.).

  10. Dermeval D, Paiva R, Bittencourt II, Vassileva J, Borges D. Authoring tools for designing intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2018;28(3):336–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0157-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dever DA, Wiedbusch MD, Romero SM, Azevedo R. Investigating pedagogical agents’ scaffolding of self-regulated learning in relation to learners’ subgoals. Br J Edu Technol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dwyer CP, Hogan MJ, Stewart I. An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Think Skills Creat. 2014;12:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: Vol. ED 315 423 (The California Academic Press, Ed.). https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialSciences/ppecorino/CT-Expert-Report.pdf

  14. Ferro LS, Sapio F, Mecella M, Temperini M, Terracina A. Intelligent pedagogic agents (IPAs) in GEA2, an educational game to teach STEM topics. Springer; 2021. p. 226–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feuerstein R, Miller R, Hoffman MB, Rand Y, Mintzker Y, Jensen MR. Cognitive modifiability in adolescence: cognitive structure and the effects of intervention. J Spec Educ. 1981;15(2):269–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698101500213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao H, Zeng Y, Ma B, Pan Y. Improving knowledge learning through modelling students’ practice-based cognitive processes. Cogn Comput. 2024;16(1):348–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10201-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. García Medina, M., Acosta Meza, D., Lengua-Cantero Claudia, Anaya Herrera, J. (2023). PCB test to assess critical thinking in students from disadvantaged contexts. Migration Letters, 20(S9), 1666–1692. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/6248/4229

  18. Gómez A, Márquez L, Zapa H, Florez M. GDA-based tutor module of an intelligent tutoring system for the personalization of pedagogic strategies. Springer; 2021. p. 742–50.

    Google Scholar 

  19. González Cástulo Y, Vargas Garduño MDL, del Campo Gómez, del Paso MI, Méndez Puga AM. Estrategias que favorecen el aprendizaje autónomo en estudiantes universitarios. Caleidoscopio—Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. 2018;21(37):75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Green N, Di Eugenio B, Harsley R, Fossati D, AlZoubi O. Behavior and learning of students using worked-out examples in a tutoring system. Springer; 2016. p. 389–95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halpern, D. (2014). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking (Psychology Press, Ed.; 5th ed). https://ia801301.us.archive.org/9/items/Thought_and_Knowledge_An_Introduction_to_Critical_Thinking_by_Diane_F._Halpern/Thought_and_Knowledge_An_Introduction_to_Critical_Thinking_by_Diane_F._Halpern.pdf

  22. Herrero, J. (2018). Elementos de Pensamiento Crítico (Marcial Pons, Ed.; 2nd ed.). https://www.marcialpons.es/media/pdf/9788491234951.pdf

  23. Joanne, K. (1987). The reasoning-centered classroom: approaches that work. ERIC RIE, 39(8), 1–79. https://n9.cl/8d0tp

  24. Lengua-Cantero C, Oviedo GB, Barboza WF, Feria MV. Emerging technologies in the teaching-learning process: towards the critical thinking development. Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion Del Profesorado. 2020;23(3):83–98. https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.435611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. López, G. (2012). Pensamiento crítico en el aula. Docencia e Investigación, 22, 41–60. https://www.educacion.to.uclm.es/pdf/revistaDI/3_22_2012.pdf

  26. Maggio, M. (2018). XIII Foro Latinoamericano de Educación Habilidades del siglo xxi. Cuando el futuro es hoy (Fundación Santillana, Ed.; 1st ed.). http://www.codajic.org/sites/default/files/sites/www.codajic.org/files/XIII-Foro-Documento-Basico-WEB.pdf

  27. Murray, T. (2003). Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments (T. Murray, S. B. Blessing, & S. Ainsworth, Eds.). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0819-7

  28. Naessens, H. (2015a). Comparación entre dos autores del pensamiento crítico: Jacques Boisvert y Richard Paul-Linda Elde. Temas de Historia y Discontinuidad Sociocultural En México, 1, 207–225. http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/57993

  29. Naessens, H. (2015b). Comparación entre dos autores del pensamiento crítico: Jacques Boisvert y Richard Paul-Linda Elder. Temas de Historia y Discontinuidad Sociocultural En México, 207–225. http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/57993/CAP 10 COMPARACION.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  30. Neelu, Jyothi, Ahuja., Roohi, Sille. (2012). 6. A Critical Review of Development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Retrospect, Present and Prospect

  31. Nosich, G. (2011). Learning to think things through: a guide to critical thinking across the curriculum (Pearson Prentice Hall, Ed.; 4th ed.).

  32. Orejudo, S. (2006). Reseña de “CALIDAD DEL APRENDIZAJE UNIVERSITARIO” de J. Biggs. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 20, 327–331. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/274/27411311022.pdf

  33. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). La mini-guía para el Pensamiento crítico Conceptos y herramientas (Foundation for Critical Thinking, Ed.; Vol. 1). https://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/PDF/SP-Comp_Standards.pdf

  34. Phobun P, Vicheanpanya J. Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e-learning systems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):4064–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roca Llobet, J. (2013). El desarrollo del Pensamiento Crítico a través de diferentes metodologías docentes en el Grado en Enfermería [Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=84936

  36. Rodríguez Chávez MH. Sistemas de tutoría inteligente y su aplicación en la educación superior. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo. 2021. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodriguez Sandoval MT, Bernal Oviedo GM, Rodriguez-Torres MI. From preconceptions to concept: the basis of a didactic model designed to promote the development of critical thinking. Int J Educ Res Open. 2022;3: 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saiz, C. (2017). Pensamiento crítico y cambio (Pirámide (Grupo Anaya S.A.), Ed.; Vol. 1).

  39. Velásquez Burgos BM, Remolina de Cleves N, CalleMárquez MG. Habilidades de pensamiento como estrategia de aprendizaje para los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigaciones UNAD. 2013;12(2):23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu M, Qiu L, Zhou J. Meta-path structured graph pre-training for improving knowledge tracing in intelligent tutoring. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;254: 124451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Corporación Universitaría del Caribe –CECAR (grant number: ACTA07/2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Lengua-Cantero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no other conficts of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lengua-Cantero, C., Caro Piñeres, M., García Medina, M. et al. The Expert and Planning Module of an Intelligent Pedagogical Agent for the Development of Critical Thinking. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 1080 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03424-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03424-w

Keywords

Navigation