Abstract
The climate changes will have a considerable impact on agriculture and food security invariably of the region and crop. Agriculture urgently has to adapt to the expanding global population in order to ensure future food security for this population. As the need of the food is increasing globally via quality and in terms of quantity, there is a need of industrialized support to field of agriculture. A group of cutting-edge technologies known as “Internet of Things” (IoT) have enormous potential to modernize the agriculture industry. Modern technology uses the term Precision agriculture in this era. A vital part of soil and water conservation on agricultural land is irrigation. An effective platform for predicting soil moisture content in the future utilizing current soil and environmental factors may be available for agricultural land irrigation needs. A significant amount of data is gathered in agriculture, and several DM techniques are employed to effectively utilize it. A number of methods related to data mining techniques are covered in this work. The Soul of Infinite Life, often known as the soil, is what keeps life on earth alive. Agriculture continues to be India’s biggest employer and source of income despite great improvements in the service sector. In order to estimate yield, this research introduces a hybrid ML model using IoT. Using a CNN-based recursive architecture, this extracted data has been categorized. Comparing the proposed system of agriculture prediction to the current system of DT, LR, SVM, and WSVM, which provides poor accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision, as well as an F1-score, HBOCNN techniques are used to get the desired results. In the fields of cultivating crops, predicting the weather, managing wildlife, forestry, raising animals, identifying markets, and funding rural areas, the study cites examples of IoTs that have helped these communities' agricultural requirements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9baf/f9baf18e1b5623affa7a576cfd50b4b4092af7f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89137/89137473480c9b2f674d6f7f16dbcf318a73ef18" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/207aa/207aa897141e9593b1913ead1804dd5c3dceb374" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a933/2a933783a788aade15bf38f2af944a0669ef211d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/803de/803dec4adc3593f5f9759d549b4371d805d21220" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2953b/2953be270362e611fa0988ab017d931c5e39db67" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4171/c417130706673a037878d16395e0423acb1b94d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e384d/e384d7292aa5bdf09e01793badf9e2aacfc25a7b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157d4/157d4233a510a02b59bd08d4eca3416c8452b857" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66185/6618592efbb4e0a51ebc6ce82afd0434c7710565" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The dataset produced and scrutinized in this study are accessible from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Sumberg J, Giller KE. What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Glob Food Sec. 2022;32: 100617.
Kohli SK, Kaur H, Khanna K, Handa N, Bhardwaj R, Rinklebe J, Ahmad P. Boron in plants: uptake, deficiency and biological potential. Plant Growth Regul. 2023;100(2):267–82.
Suresh M, Manjupriya S. Internet of Things (IoT) in agriculture: an overview of the concepts and challenges in its implementation. Test Engineering and Management, 2020; pp. 16955–99.
Nosheen S, Ajmal I, Song Y. Microbes as biofertilizers, a potential approach for sustainable crop production. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1868.
Anas M, Liao F, Verma KK, Sarwar MA, Mahmood A, Chen ZL, et al. Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches. Biol Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4.
Han J, Lin N, Ruan J, Wang X, Wei W, Lu H. A model for joint planning of production and distribution of fresh produce in agricultural internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020;8(12):9683–96.
Huang K, Shu L, Li K, Yang F, Han G, Wang X, Pearson S. Photovoltaic agricultural internet of things towards realizing the next generation of smart farming. IEEE Access. 2020;8:76300–12.
Kim WS, Lee WS, Kim YJ. A review of the applications of the internet of things (IoT) for agricultural automation. J Biosyst Eng. 2020;45:385–400.
Zhou T, Zhang J. Design and implementation of agricultural Internet of Things system based on AliyunIoT platform and STM32. J Phys. 2020;1574(1): 012159 (IOP Publishing).
Glaroudis D, Iossifides A, Chatzimisios P. Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming. Comput Netw. 2020;168: 107037.
Steinhübel L, von Cramon-Taubadel S. Somewhere in between towns, markets and jobs–agricultural intensification in the rural–urban interface. J Develop Stud. 2021;57(4):669–94.
Santos TT, de Souza LL, dos Santos AA, Avila S. Grape detection, segmentation, and tracking using deep neural networks and three-dimensional association. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;170: 105247.
Saleem MH, Potgieter J, Arif KM. Automation in agriculture by machine and deep learning techniques: a review of recent developments. Precision Agric. 2021;22:2053–91.
Kreutzweiser D, Dutkiewicz D, Capell S, Sibley P, Scarr T. Changes in streamside riparian forest canopy and leaf litter nutrient flux to soils during an emerald ash borer infestation in an agricultural landscape. Biol Invasions. 2020;22:1865–78.
Kamrani K, Roozbahani A, Shahdany SMH. Using Bayesian networks to evaluate how agricultural water distribution systems handle the water-food-energy nexus. Agric Water Manag. 2020;239: 106265.
Pham HV, Sperotto A, Furlan E, Torresan S, Marcomini A, Critto A. Integrating Bayesian Networks into ecosystem services assessment to support water management at the river basin scale. Ecosyst Serv. 2021;50: 101300.
Lu B, Dao PD, Liu J, He Y, Shang J. Recent advances of hyperspectral imaging technology and applications in agriculture. Remote Sens. 2020;12(16):2659.
Aptoula E. Weed and crop classification with domain adaptation for precision agriculture. In: 2021 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) 2021;pp. 1–4. IEEE.
Huang F, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Shangguan W, Li Q, Li L, Jiang S. Interpreting Conv-LSTM for spatio-temporal soil moisture prediction in China. Agriculture. 2023;13(5):971.
Dardonville M, Urruty N, Bockstaller C, Therond O. Influence of diversity and intensification level on vulnerability, resilience and robustness of agricultural systems. Agric Syst. 2020;184: 102913.
Bolfe ÉL, Jorge LADC, Sanches IDA, LuchiariJúnior A, da Costa CC, Victoria DDC, et al. Precision and digital agriculture: adoption of technologies and perception of Brazilian farmers. Agriculture. 2020;10(12):653.
Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci. 2019;90: 100315.
Suresh M & Manjupriya S. An IoT based intelligent decision support system for smart farming using machine learning techniques. The Seybold Report, 2022;pp. 528–39.
Nuthalapati, S. V. & Tunga, A. Multi-domain few-shot learning and dataset for agricultural applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021;pp. 1399–408.
Wspanialy P, Brooks J & Moussa M. An image labeling tool and agricultural dataset for deep learning. arXiv preprint. 2020. arXiv:2004.03351.
Suresh M & Manjupriya S. Internet of Things: views, implementations and challenges in deployment, IT in Industry. 2021;9(3):72–6.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledged the REVA University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India and Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India for their invaluable support in facilitating the research through provision of necessary facilities.
Funding
No funding received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This research was a collective effort, made possible through the collaboration and contributions of all authors involved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Priya, S.M., Suresh, M. Agricultural Prediction Using Hybrid Butterfly Optimization with Convolutional Neural Network. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 1086 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03449-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03449-1