Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agricultural Prediction Using Hybrid Butterfly Optimization with Convolutional Neural Network

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The climate changes will have a considerable impact on agriculture and food security invariably of the region and crop. Agriculture urgently has to adapt to the expanding global population in order to ensure future food security for this population. As the need of the food is increasing globally via quality and in terms of quantity, there is a need of industrialized support to field of agriculture. A group of cutting-edge technologies known as “Internet of Things” (IoT) have enormous potential to modernize the agriculture industry. Modern technology uses the term Precision agriculture in this era. A vital part of soil and water conservation on agricultural land is irrigation. An effective platform for predicting soil moisture content in the future utilizing current soil and environmental factors may be available for agricultural land irrigation needs. A significant amount of data is gathered in agriculture, and several DM techniques are employed to effectively utilize it. A number of methods related to data mining techniques are covered in this work. The Soul of Infinite Life, often known as the soil, is what keeps life on earth alive. Agriculture continues to be India’s biggest employer and source of income despite great improvements in the service sector. In order to estimate yield, this research introduces a hybrid ML model using IoT. Using a CNN-based recursive architecture, this extracted data has been categorized. Comparing the proposed system of agriculture prediction to the current system of DT, LR, SVM, and WSVM, which provides poor accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision, as well as an F1-score, HBOCNN techniques are used to get the desired results. In the fields of cultivating crops, predicting the weather, managing wildlife, forestry, raising animals, identifying markets, and funding rural areas, the study cites examples of IoTs that have helped these communities' agricultural requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The dataset produced and scrutinized in this study are accessible from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sumberg J, Giller KE. What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Glob Food Sec. 2022;32: 100617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohli SK, Kaur H, Khanna K, Handa N, Bhardwaj R, Rinklebe J, Ahmad P. Boron in plants: uptake, deficiency and biological potential. Plant Growth Regul. 2023;100(2):267–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suresh M, Manjupriya S. Internet of Things (IoT) in agriculture: an overview of the concepts and challenges in its implementation. Test Engineering and Management, 2020; pp. 16955–99.

  4. Nosheen S, Ajmal I, Song Y. Microbes as biofertilizers, a potential approach for sustainable crop production. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anas M, Liao F, Verma KK, Sarwar MA, Mahmood A, Chen ZL, et al. Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches. Biol Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han J, Lin N, Ruan J, Wang X, Wei W, Lu H. A model for joint planning of production and distribution of fresh produce in agricultural internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020;8(12):9683–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang K, Shu L, Li K, Yang F, Han G, Wang X, Pearson S. Photovoltaic agricultural internet of things towards realizing the next generation of smart farming. IEEE Access. 2020;8:76300–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim WS, Lee WS, Kim YJ. A review of the applications of the internet of things (IoT) for agricultural automation. J Biosyst Eng. 2020;45:385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou T, Zhang J. Design and implementation of agricultural Internet of Things system based on AliyunIoT platform and STM32. J Phys. 2020;1574(1): 012159 (IOP Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glaroudis D, Iossifides A, Chatzimisios P. Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming. Comput Netw. 2020;168: 107037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steinhübel L, von Cramon-Taubadel S. Somewhere in between towns, markets and jobs–agricultural intensification in the rural–urban interface. J Develop Stud. 2021;57(4):669–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santos TT, de Souza LL, dos Santos AA, Avila S. Grape detection, segmentation, and tracking using deep neural networks and three-dimensional association. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;170: 105247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saleem MH, Potgieter J, Arif KM. Automation in agriculture by machine and deep learning techniques: a review of recent developments. Precision Agric. 2021;22:2053–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kreutzweiser D, Dutkiewicz D, Capell S, Sibley P, Scarr T. Changes in streamside riparian forest canopy and leaf litter nutrient flux to soils during an emerald ash borer infestation in an agricultural landscape. Biol Invasions. 2020;22:1865–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamrani K, Roozbahani A, Shahdany SMH. Using Bayesian networks to evaluate how agricultural water distribution systems handle the water-food-energy nexus. Agric Water Manag. 2020;239: 106265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pham HV, Sperotto A, Furlan E, Torresan S, Marcomini A, Critto A. Integrating Bayesian Networks into ecosystem services assessment to support water management at the river basin scale. Ecosyst Serv. 2021;50: 101300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu B, Dao PD, Liu J, He Y, Shang J. Recent advances of hyperspectral imaging technology and applications in agriculture. Remote Sens. 2020;12(16):2659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aptoula E. Weed and crop classification with domain adaptation for precision agriculture. In: 2021 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) 2021;pp. 1–4. IEEE.

  19. Huang F, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Shangguan W, Li Q, Li L, Jiang S. Interpreting Conv-LSTM for spatio-temporal soil moisture prediction in China. Agriculture. 2023;13(5):971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dardonville M, Urruty N, Bockstaller C, Therond O. Influence of diversity and intensification level on vulnerability, resilience and robustness of agricultural systems. Agric Syst. 2020;184: 102913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolfe ÉL, Jorge LADC, Sanches IDA, LuchiariJúnior A, da Costa CC, Victoria DDC, et al. Precision and digital agriculture: adoption of technologies and perception of Brazilian farmers. Agriculture. 2020;10(12):653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci. 2019;90: 100315.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suresh M & Manjupriya S. An IoT based intelligent decision support system for smart farming using machine learning techniques. The Seybold Report, 2022;pp. 528–39.

  24. Nuthalapati, S. V. & Tunga, A. Multi-domain few-shot learning and dataset for agricultural applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021;pp. 1399–408.

  25. Wspanialy P, Brooks J & Moussa M. An image labeling tool and agricultural dataset for deep learning. arXiv preprint. 2020. arXiv:2004.03351.

  26. Suresh M & Manjupriya S. Internet of Things: views, implementations and challenges in deployment, IT in Industry. 2021;9(3):72–6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledged the REVA University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India and Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India for their invaluable support in facilitating the research through provision of necessary facilities.

Funding

No funding received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This research was a collective effort, made possible through the collaboration and contributions of all authors involved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Manju Priya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priya, S.M., Suresh, M. Agricultural Prediction Using Hybrid Butterfly Optimization with Convolutional Neural Network. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 1086 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03449-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03449-1

Keywords

Navigation