Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ultra-Wideband, Low-Power, Inductorless, 3.1–4.8 GHz, CMOS VCO

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A low-power, inductorless, UWB CMOS voltage controlled oscillator is designed in 0.18 μm CMOS technology targeting to a UWBFM transmitter application. The VCO is a Double-Cross-Coupled Multivibrator and generates output frequencies ranging from 1.55 GHz to 2.4 GHz. A low-power frequency doubler based on a Gilbert cell, which operates in weak inversion, doubles the VCO tuning range from 3.1 GHz to 4.8 GHz. The proportionality between the oscillation frequency and the bias current is avoided in this case for the entire achieved tuning range resulting in a low-power design. The selected architecture provides high suppression, over 45 dB, for the 1st and 3rd harmonics, while enabling high-frequency operation and conversion gain due to the unbalanced structure and the single-ended output. The proposed VCO draws 4 mA from a 1.8 V supply, it has a phase noise of −76.7 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from the center frequency, while it exhibits a very high ratio of tuning range (43%) over power consumption equal to 7.76 dB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Barret, History of Ultra Wideband (UWB) radar & communications: pioneers and innovators, in Proc. Progress in Electromagnetics Symposium, July 2000, Cambridge, MA, USA (2000), pp. 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Buonomo, A. Sciavo, Analysis of emitter (source)-coupled multivibrators. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 53, 1193–1202 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Deen, R. Murji, A. Fakhr, N. Jafferalli, W. Ngan, Low power CMOS integrated circuits for radio frequency applications. IEEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 152, 509–522 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Do, R.Y. Zhao, K.S. Teo, J.G. Ma, New wideband/dualband CMOS LC voltage-controlled oscillator. IEEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 150, 453–459 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Finvers, I.M. Filanovsky, Analysis of source-coupled CMOS multivibrator. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 35, 1182–1185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Georgiadis, M. Detratti, A linear, low-power, wideband CMOS VCO for FM-UWB applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 50, 1955–1958 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.F.M. Gerrits, M.H.L. Kouvenhoven, P.R. van der Meer, J.R. Farserotu, J.R. Long, Principles and limitations of ultra-wideband FM communications systems. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 3, 382–396 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hogervorst, Design of low-voltage low-power CMOS operational amplifier cells. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, 1996

  9. A. Jerng, C. Sodini, The impact of device type and sizing on phase noise mechanisms. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 40, 360–369 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Kimura, Some circuit design techniques for bipolar and MOS pseudologarithmic rectifiers operable on low supply voltage. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Fundam. Theory Appl. 39, 771–777 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Kimura, A bipolar four-quadrant analog quarter-square multiplier consisting of unbalanced emitter-coupled pairs and expansions of its input ranges. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 29, 46–55 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Kimura, H. Asazawa, Frequency mixer with a frequency doubler for integrated circuits. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 29, 1133–1137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Leeson, A simple model of feedback oscillator noise spectrum. Proc. IEEE 54, 329–330 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Murji, M. Deen, Design issues of a low power wideband frequency doubler implementation in 0.18 μm CMOS. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 53, 53–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L.B. Oliveira, A. Allam, I.M. Filanovsky, J. Fernades, On phase noise in quadrature cross-coupled oscillators, in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2005, Kobe, Japan (2005), pp. 2635–2638

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Popov, N. Tchamov, P. Jarske, New high speed double cross-coupled ICO/VCO, in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Oct. 1996, Rhodes, Greece (1996), pp. 243–246

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Razavi, A study of phase noise in CMOS oscillators. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 31, 331–343 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, 1st edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.J. Song, H. Kim, Y. Choi, W. Kim, A 50% power reduction scheme for CMOS relaxation oscillator, in Proc. First IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on ASICs, Aug. 1999, Seoul, South Korea (1999), pp. 154–157

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Tchamov, A. Popov, P. Jarske, VCO with double cross-coupled high-speed and low-power multivibrator architecture, in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 1996, Atlanta, USA (1996), pp. 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Tchamov, A. Popov, P. Jarske, New low-power/high speed double-cross-coupled ICO/VCO, in Proc. IEEE MTT-S Symposium on Technologies for Wireless Applications Digest, Feb. 1997, Vancouver, BC, Canada (1997), pp. 157–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Tong, Z. Wenhua, J. Mikkelsen, T. Larsen, A 0.18 μm CMOS low power ring VCO with 1 GHz tuning range for 3–5 GHz FM-UWB applications, in Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Communication Systems, Oct.–Nov. 2006, Singapore (2006), pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Tu, J. Yeh, H. Tsai, C. Wang, A 1.8 V 2.5–5.2 GHz CMOS dual input two stage ring VCO, in Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Advanced System Integrated Circuits, Aug. 2004, Fukuoka, Japan (2004), pp. 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Vaananen, M. Metsanvirta, N. Tchamov, A 3.6 GHz double cross-coupled multivibrator VCO with 1.6 GHz tuning. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Analog Digital Signal Process. 48, 79–802 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Vaananen, M. Metsanvirta, N. Tchamov, A 4.3 GHz VCO with 2 GHz tuning range and low phase noise. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 36, 142–146 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C.-C. Wei, H.-C. Chiu, W.-S. Feng, An ultra-wideband CMOS VCO with 3–5 GHz tuning range, in Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Radio-Frequency Integration Technology, Nov.–Dec. 2005, Singapore (2005), pp. 87–90

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Zheng, C. Saavedra, Compact CMOS VCO using a transistor for frequency control, in Proc. ANTEM/URSI International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics, July 2006, Montreal, Canada (2006), pp. 115–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Patras, Patra, Greece

    Athanasios Tsitouras

  2. Department of Computer & Communication Engineering, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Fotis Plessas

Authors
  1. Athanasios Tsitouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fotis Plessas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios Tsitouras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsitouras, A., Plessas, F. Ultra-Wideband, Low-Power, Inductorless, 3.1–4.8 GHz, CMOS VCO. Circuits Syst Signal Process 30, 263–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-010-9220-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-010-9220-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation