Skip to main content
Log in

2-D Deconvolved Conventional Beamforming for a Planar Array

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to generate volumetric underwater acoustic images, planar arrays are often used to collect the signals coming from a 3-D scene in underwater environment. These acquired signals are commonly processed using the 2-D conventional beamforming method. The 2-D conventional beamforming is robust and the most commonly used method. However, the 2-D conventional beamforming suffers from fat beams and high-level sidelobes. High-resolution beamforming, based on the inverse of the signal covariance matrix, such as minimum-variance distortionless response, produces narrow beamwidth and low sidelobe levels but is sensitive to signal mismatch and requires many snapshots of data. In order to overcome the above-mentioned limitations, this paper applies a 2-D deconvolution algorithm to the 2-D conventional beamforming result of planar array in order to improve the beamwidth and suppress the high-level sidelobes. The 2-D deconvolved beam power produces narrow beams, and low sidelobe levels without compromising the robustness of 2-D conventional beamforming. The 2-D deconvolution algorithm provides higher output signal-to-noise ratio than the 2-D conventional beamforming for isotropic noise. The vector extrapolation method is improved to make it applicable on two-dimensional data. The detailed implementations of the original 2-D deconvolved beamforming and the efficient 2-D deconvolved beamforming are presented. Simulations and experiments are conducted to validate the performance of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Due to the data reproducing these findings also forms part of an ongoing study, so supporting data is not available.

References

  1. D.S.C. Biggs, M. Andrews, Acceleration of iterative image restoration algorithms. Opt. Soc. Am. 36(8), 1766–1775 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.C. Calvo, A.L. Thangawng, M. Nicholas, C.L. Layma, Thin Fresnel zone plate lenses for focusing underwater sound. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(1), 014103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Cox, R.M. Zeskind, M.H. Owen, Robust adaptive beamforming. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 35(10), 1365–1376 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B.F. Cron, C.H. Sherman, Spatial correlation functions for various noise models. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1732 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.C. Dhanantwari, S. Stergiopoulos, L. Song, C. Parodi, F. Bertora, P. Pellegretti, A. Questa, An efficient 3D beamformer implementation for real-time 4D ultra sound systems deploying array probes, in IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, August 23–27(Canada, Toronto, 2004), pp. 1421–1424

  6. G.F. Edelmann, J.S. Rogers, S.L. Means, Beam space compressive spatial spectrum estimation on large aperture acoustic arrays. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136(4), 2214–2214 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Gersoft, A. Xenaki, C.F. Mechlenbrauker, Multiple and single snapshot compressive beamforming. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138(4), 2003 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Huang, T. Zhou, W. Du, J. Shen, W. Zhang, Smart ocean: a new fast deconvolved beamforming algorithm for multibeam sonar. Sensors 18(11), 4013 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Hellequin, J.M. Boucher, X. Lurton, Processing of high-frequency multibeam echo sounder data for seafloor characterization. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 28(1), 78–98 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Hellequin, Statistical characterization of multibeam echo sounder data, in IEEE OCEANS’98 Conference Proceeding, September 28–October 1 (France, Nice, 1998), pp. 228–233

  11. M.J. Jacobson, Space-time correlation in spherical and circular noise fields. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34(7), 971 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Jiang, W. Zeng, A. Yasotharan, H.C. So, T. Kirubarajan, Robust beamforming by linear programming. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 62(7), 1834–1849 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Kaiho, A dream for realization of high-speed, 3D volume image by lens-focused method, in Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the Asian Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, May 17–21(Japan, Utsunomiya, 2004), pp. 38–46

  14. L.B. Lucy, An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron. J. 79(6), 745–754 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Li, B. Wei, J. Zhu, C. Li, S. Xing, Calibration of multibeam echo sounder transducer array based on focused beamforming. Sens. J. IEEE. 18(24), 10199–10207 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.P. Lyons, D.A. Abraham, Statistical characterization of high-frequency shallow-water seafloor backscatter. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(3), 1307–1315 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Murino, A. Trucco, Dynamic focusing by FFT beamforming for underwater 3D imaging, in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing, November 13–16 (America, Austin, 1994), pp. 169–172

  18. B. Maranda, Efficient digital beamforming in the frequency domain. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86(1813), 1813–1819 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W.H. Richardson, Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62(1), 55–59 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Stoica, Z. Wang, J. Li, Robust capon beamforming. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 10(6), 172–175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Takase, T. Anada, T. Tsuchiya, N. Nakamura, Realtime sonar system using acoustic lens and numerical analysis based on 2D/3D parabolic equation method, in IEEE OCEANSE 2005 Europe, June 20–23(France, Brest, 2005), pp. 23–28.

  22. F. Zhang, A. Bilas, A. Dhanantwari, K.N. Plataniotis, R. Abiprojo, S. Stergiopoulos, Parallelization and performances of 3D ultrasound imaging beamforming algorithms on modern clusters, in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Supercomputing, June 22–26 (America, New York, 2002), pp. 294–304

  23. L.J. Ziomek, Fundamentals of Acoustic Field Theory and Space-Time Signal Processing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995). (ch. 7)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41976176, U1709203,52001097), the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1402303, 2018YFF01013401), and the Financial Assistance from Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund of Heilongjiang (LBH-Q18042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Du.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, T., Huang, J., Du, W. et al. 2-D Deconvolved Conventional Beamforming for a Planar Array. Circuits Syst Signal Process 40, 5572–5593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-021-01733-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-021-01733-6

Keywords

Navigation