Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Should remote collaborators be represented by avatars? A matter of common ground for collective medical decision-making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a collaborative work situation at a distance, the use of avatars to represent collaborators reduces collaborative effort. Also, animated avatars can help distant users to ground their relationship and facilitate their interaction because they materialise visual clues for the distant collaborators and their current activity. To check the validity of these hypotheses we set up an experiment based on the use of a collaborative virtual environment (CVE) synchronised for collective medical decision-making. Several teams of practitioners from different disciplines will be required to deal with liver tumours displayed in Argonaute 3D. In this paper, we provide some evidence from existing studies for the hypotheses and select several measures to estimate the grounding process in CVEs. Next, we briefly describe the setup used to collect observable data with Argonaute 3D and we summarise first observations acquired with practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.there.com/index.html

  2. http://www.francetelecom.com/fr/espaces/journalistes/dossiers/DP_old/att00004822/dp_021105.pdf

  3. http://www.rd.francetelecom.fr/fr/galerie/navig_argonaute3D.htm

References

  • Bangerter A (2004) Using pointing and describing to achieve joint focus of attention in dialogue. Psychol Sci 15(6):415–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter A, Clark HH (2003) Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognit Sci 27:195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S (1995) The eye direction detector (EDD) and the shared attention mechanism (SAM): two cases for evolutionary psychology. In: Moore C, Dunham PJ (eds) Joint attention: its origins and role in development. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford SD, Bowers JM, Fahlén LE, Greenhalgh CM, Snowdon DN (1995) User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings. 1995 ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’95), Denver, Colorado, USA, ACM Press

  • Beun RJ, Cremers AHM (1998) Object reference in a shared domain of conversation. Pragmat Cogn 6:121–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Biocca F (1997) The cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J Comput Mediated Commun [On-line], 3 (2). Retrieved August 27, 2004 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html

  • Brennan SE (1998) The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In: Fussel SR, Kreuz RJ (eds) Social and cognitive psychological approaches to interpersonal communication. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 201–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan SE (2000) Processes that shape conversation and their implications for computational linguistics. In: Proceedings 38th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. ACL, Hong Kong

  • Brennan SE, Ohaeri JO (1999) Why do electronic conversations seem less polite? The costs and benefits of hedging. In: Proceedings international joint conference on work activities, coordination, and collaboration (WACC’99), San Francisco

  • Carroll JM, Neale DC, Isenhour PL, Rosson MB, McCrickard DS (2003) Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. Int J Hum Comput Stud 58:605–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley S (eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. APA Books, Washington, pp 127–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Marshall CR (1981) Definitive reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshi AK, Webber BL, Sag IA (eds) Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 10–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Schaefer EF (1987) Collaborating on contributions to conversation. Language and cognitive processes, 2, 19–41. Reprinted In: Dietrich R, Graumann CF (eds) Language processing in a social context. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989

  • Clark HH, Schaefer EF (1989) Contributing to discourse. Cognit Sci 13:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falzon P (1994) Dialogues fonctionnels et activité collective. Trav Hum 57:299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • France E, Anderson AH, Gardner M (2001) The impact of status and audio-conferencing technology on business meetings. Int J Hum Comput Stud 54:857–876

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garau M, Slater M, Pertaub DP, Razzaque S (2005) The responses of people to virtual humans in an immersive virtual environment. Presence: Teleop Virt Environ 14(1):104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard M, Moore D, Hobbs D (2004) Embodiment and presence in collaborative interfaces. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61(4):453–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guye-Villème A, Capin TK, Pandzic IS, Thalmann NM, Thalmann D (1999) Nonverbal communication interface for collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Reality J 4:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JT, Dunham PJ (2001) Language use in computer-mediated communication: the role of coordination devices. Discourse Process 31:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré R, Van Langehove L (1991) Varieties of positioning. J Theory Soc Behav 21:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans HJM (1996) Voicing the self: from information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychol Bull 119(1):31–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hoc J-M (1990) Les activités de diagnostic. In: Richard J-F, Bonnet C, Ghiglione R (eds) Traité de Psychologie cognitive (tome 2). Dunod, Paris, pp 158–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Siegel J (2003) Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Hum Comput Interact 18:13–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leplat J (2001) La gestion des communications par le contexte. Pistes [On-line], 3 (1). Retrieved August 27, 2004 from http://www.pistes.uqam.ca/v3n1/articles/v3n1a2.htm

  • Mynatt ED, Adler A, Ito M, O’Dey VL (1997) Design for network communities. In: Proceedings, ACM SIGGHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘97). ACM, Atlanta

  • Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Dryer C (1995) Can computers be human personalities? Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(2):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nass C, Lee K (2001) Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. J Exp Psychol Appl 7(3):171–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro C (2001) Partage de l’information en situation de coopération à distance et nouvelles technologies: Bilan des recherches récentes. Trav Hum 64(4):297–319

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15:139–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ousland AR (1999) Comparison of multimedia conferencing in 2D and 3D environments. EURESCOM Project P807, JUPITER II. Retrieved August 27, 2004 from http://www.eurescom.de/~public-webspace/P800-series/P807/index.html

  • Querrec R (2002) Les systêmes multi-agents pour les environnements virtuels de formation: application à la sécurité civile. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Bretagne Occidentale

  • Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva G, Galimberti C (1998) Computer-mediated communication: identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 124:434–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski J (1994) Formation aux activités collectives. Trav Hum 57:367–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K (1994) Cooperative work and its articulation: requirements for computer support. Trav Hum 57:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman RC (2001) The mind’s eye in cyberspace: online perceptions of self and others. In: Riva G, Galimberti C (eds) Towards cyberspsychology: mind, cognition, and society in the Internet age. IOS Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunication. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull L, Kiesler S (1986) Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage Sci 32:1492–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talamo A, Ligorio B (2001) Strategic identities in cyberspace. Cyberpsych Behav 4(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapie J (2004) La prise de décision collective dans les environnements virtuels collaboratifs. Etude de cas en réalité virtuelle partagée. Université Toulouse II, Décembre

  • Terssac de G, Chabaud C (1990) Référentiel opératif commun et fiabilité. In: Leplat J, de Terssac G (eds) Les facteurs humains de la fiabilité dans les systèmes complexes. Toulouse, Octarès pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Thie S, van Wijk J (1998) A general theory on presence: experimental evaluation of social virtual presence in a decision making task. In: Presence in shared virtual environment workshop, June 10–11, University College London, UK. Retrieved August 27, 2004 from http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/m.slater/BTWorkshop/KPN/

  • Velichkovsky BM (1995) Communicating attention: gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmat Cogn 3:199–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. France Telecom R&D, FTR&D/DIH/HDM, Lannion, France

    J. Tapie & L. Perron

  2. Laboratoire Travail et Cognition, UMR CNRS 5551, Université Toulouse le Mirail, 5 all. A. Machado, 31058, Toulouse cedex 9, France

    J. Tapie, P. Terrier & J.-M. Cellier

Authors
  1. J. Tapie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Terrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Perron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.-M. Cellier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Terrier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tapie, J., Terrier, P., Perron, L. et al. Should remote collaborators be represented by avatars? A matter of common ground for collective medical decision-making. AI & Soc 20, 331–350 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0028-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0028-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation