Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A theoretical perspective on social agency

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In interacting with artificial social agents, novel forms of sociality between humans and machines emerge. The theme of Social Agency between humans and robots is of emerging importance. In this paper key theoretical issues are discussed in a preliminary exploration of the concept. We try to understand what Social Agency is and how it is created by, negotiated with, and attributed to artificial agents. This is done in particular considering socially situated robots and by exploring how people recognize and accept social agents. The interplay between humans and agents is investigated through dynamics of interpretation, signification and attribution. The ultimate goal of this research is to explore the challenges and opportunities brought by the design of socially intelligent agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See McCloud (1999) for brilliant examples.

References

  • Ackermann E (2005) Playthings that do things: a young kid’s "incredibles"! In: Proceedings IDC 2005, interaction design and children, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 8–10 June

  • Barad K (1998) Agential realism: feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In: Biagioli Mario (ed) The science studies reader. Routledge Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad K (2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs J Women Cult Soc 28(3):801–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad K (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness. An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C, Giardini F (2003). Will humans and robots ever coordinate each other via behavioural communication? In: Symposium on evolvability and interaction: evolutionary substrates of communication, signalling, and perception in the dynamics of social complexity. Queen Mary University, London, pp 30–35

  • Christensen HI, Pacchierotti E (2005) Embodied social interaction for robots. In: Proceedings of AISB-05. Hertsfordshire, UK, April 2005

  • Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2004) Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Pragmat Cogn 12(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher H, Di Paolo EA (2007) Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6(4):485–507

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSalvo C, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2002). All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Designing interactive systems 2002 conference proceedings, pp. 321–326

  • Duffy B (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Rob Auton Syst 42:177–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2002) A survey of socially interactive robots. Rob Auton Syst 42:143–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini F, Castelfanchi C (2004) Behavioural implicit communication for human–robot interaction. AAAI Fall Symposium Series Technical Report FS-04-05. California AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 91–96

  • Giusti L, Marti P (2006) Interpretative dynamics in human robot interaction. In: K. Dautenhahn, C. Nehaniv (eds) Getting to know socially intelligent robots. Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN 06: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK, 6–8 Sept 2006

  • Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro H, Nishio S (2007) Building artificial humans for understanding humans. J Artif Organs 10:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kac E (2001) Robotic art chronology. Convergence 7(1):87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn P, Ishiguro H, Friedman B, Kanda T, Freier N, Severson R, Miller J (2007) What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human–robot interaction. Interact Stud 8:363–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd C, Breazeal C (2005) Sociable robot systems for real-world problems. In: Proceedings of monitoring, measuring and motivating exercise: ubiquitous computing to support fitness Workshop at Ubicomp 05 (The Seventh International Conference on ubiquitous computing). Tokyo, Japan, 11–14 September

  • Leslie A (1994) TOMM, TOBY, and agency: core architecture and domain specificity. In: Hirschfeld L, Gelman S (eds) Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti P, Pollini A, Rullo A, Shibata T, (2005a) Engaging with artificial pets. In: Proceedings of annual conference of the European Association of cognitive ergonomics, 2005, Chania, Crete, Greece, 29 September–1 October 2005

  • Marti P, Giusti L, Pollini A, Rullo A (2005b) Experiencing the flow: design issues in human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies. Grenoble, France

  • Marti P, Bacigalupo M, Giusti L, Mennecozzi C, Shibata T (2006) Socially assistive robotics in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. In: Proceedings of the BioRob 2006 the first IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics. Pisa, Italy

  • Masciotra D, Ackermann E (1997) To know is to relate: the art of distancing in human transactions, from the world wide web. http://www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/k32277/Know.relate.conference.htm

  • McCloud S (1999) Understanding comics. Vittorio Pavesio, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (1990) Foundations for developing a concept of self. The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modelling, and self practice in infancy. In: Cicchetti e M.Beeghly (a cura di) the self in transition. Infancy to childood, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp139–164

  • Meltzoff AN (1995) Infants’ understanding of people and things: from body imitation to folk psychology. In: Bermudez J (ed) Body and the Self. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2003) What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapproachment between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The Royal Society

  • Mori M (1982) The Buddha in the robot, Charles E. Tuttle Co

  • Nikolovska L, Ackermann E (2006) Exploratory design, augmented furniture: on the importance of object’s presence. In: Dillenbourg P, Cherubini M (eds) Collaborative artefacts, interactive furniture. Springer, Berlin (book chapter accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman D (2005) Robots in the home: what might they do? Interactions, 12

  • Norman D (2007) The design of future things. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972) La formazione del simbolo nel bambino. Imitazione, gioco e sogno. Immagine e rappresentazione (tit. orig.: La formation du symbole chez l’enfant—1945) La Nuova Italia Ed., Firenze

  • Spanjaard M. (1992) Interactive art. Prix Ars Electronica. Available at: http://www.aec.at/en/archives/prix_archive/prix_projekt.asp?iProjectID=10838

  • Suchman LA (2007) Human–machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance S (2006) The ethical status of artificial agents—with and without consciousness. In: Tamburrini G, Datteri E (eds) Ethics of human interaction with robotic, bionic and AI systems: concepts and policies. Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, Napoli, pp 60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. AI and Society, April 2008

  • Weizenbaum J (1966) ELIZA - A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 9:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods S (2006) Exploring the design space of robots: children’s perspectives. Interact Comput 18:1390–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods S, Davis M, Dautenhahn K, Schulz J (2005) Can robots be used as a vehicle for the projection of socially sensitive issues? Exploring children’s attitudes towards robots through stories. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2005), IEEE Press, Nashville, USA, 13–15 August, pp 384–389,

  • Wyeth P (2007) Agency, tangible technology and young children. In: Proceedings of the 6th international Conference on interaction design and children (Aalborg, Denmark, 6–8 June 2007). IDC ‘07. ACM, New York, pp 101–104

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Communication Science Department, University of Siena, Via Roma 56, 53100, Siena, Italy

    Alessandro Pollini

Authors
  1. Alessandro Pollini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Pollini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollini, A. A theoretical perspective on social agency. AI & Soc 24, 165–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0189-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0189-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation