Skip to main content
Log in

Toward combining autonomy and interactivity for social robots

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of social robots in achieving natural coexistence with humans depends on both their level of autonomy and their interactive abilities. Although a lot of robotic architectures have been suggested and many researchers have focused on human–robot interaction, a robotic architecture that can effectively combine interactivity and autonomy is still unavailable. This paper contributes to the research efforts toward this architecture in the following ways. First a theoretical analysis is provided that leads to the notion of co-evolution between the agent and its environment and with other agents as the condition needed to combine both autonomy and interactivity. The analysis also shows that the basic competencies needed to achieve the required level of autonomy and the envisioned level of interactivity are similar but not the same. Secondly nine specific requirements are then formalized that should be achieved by the architecture. Thirdly a robotic architecture that tries to achieve those requirements by utilizing two main theoretical hypothesis and several insights from social science, developmental psychology and neuroscience is detailed. Lastly two experiments with a humanoid robot and a simulated agent are reported to show the potential of the proposed architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyle M (2001) Bodily communication. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell RL (1970) Kinesics and context. University of Philadelphia Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg BM (1997) Old tricks, new dogs: ethology and interactive creatures. PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA (1991) Challenges for complete creature architectures. In: Meyer JA, Wilson SW (eds) From animals to animats. MIT, Cambridge, pp 434–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum D (2004) Imitation and social learning for synthetic characters. PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2004) Founding autonomy: the dialectics between (social) environment and agent’s architecture and powers. Lect Notes Artif Intell 2969:40–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon WS, Ogston WD (1966) Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. J Nerv Ment Dis 143:338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies M, Stone T (1995) Mental simulation. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro H et al (1999) A robot architecture based on situated modules. In: IEEE/RSJ Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol 3, pp 1617–1624

  • Kendon A (1970) Movement coordination in social interaction: some examples considered. Acta Pyschol 32:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C (1999) Robust radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 29(6):674–685

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall JJ (1978) Interactional synchrony: a reappraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 36:963–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2006) Interactive perception for amplification of intended behavior in complex noisy environments. In: International workshop of Social Intelligence Design 2006 (SID2006), Osaka, pp 173–187

  • Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2007) Intention through interaction: towards mutual intention in human–robot interactions. In: IEA/AIE 2007 conference, Kyoto, pp 114–124

  • Mohammad YFO, Nishida T (2008) Two layers action integration for HRI: action integration with attention focusing for interactive robots. Accepted for ICINCO 2008, Maderia

  • Mohammad Y et al (2007) Embodiment of knowledge into the interaction and physical domains using robots. In: ICCAS 2007, Seoul, pp 737–744

  • Murata A et al (1997) Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 78:2226–2230

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberman LM et al (2007) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: toward and analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70:2194–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez MC (2003) A proposal for a behavior-based control architecture with reinforcement learning for an autonomous underwater robot. PhD thesis. University of Girona, Girona

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh MA (2004) Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: implications for autism. Brain Cogn 55:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P (2002) The physical symbol grounding problem. Cogn Syst Res 3:429–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemke T (1999) Does representation need reality. In: Rethinking grounding. Plenum, New York, pp 177–190

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasser Mohammad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammad, Y., Nishida, T. Toward combining autonomy and interactivity for social robots. AI & Soc 24, 35–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0196-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0196-3

Keywords

Navigation