Abstract
At its centennial in 2001, the American Philosophical Association bravely proclaimed: “Philosophy Matters.” But does it? It won’t unless it reaches the concreteness of everyday life. To do so was Martin Heidegger’s ambition, and one can read Saul Kripke’s books as an attempt to get mainstream American philosophy beyond its abstractions. At length, Kripke’s efforts, on one reading, failed while Heidegger’s remained incomplete. A theory of commodification can get us closer to the things that matter to us in everyday life.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Heidegger (1960) translations are mine.
The situation is complicated. Kripke has reservation about metaphysical naturalism, and the one philosopher he has extensively discussed, Wittgenstein, is usually invoked as the founder of the minority analytic school Brian Leiter has called quietism. See Leiter, The Future, pp. 7–19.
Wittgenstein (2001).
Carnap (1963).
Weinberg (1993).
Rorty (1982).
Reichenbach (1951).
Kim (1989).
Kripke, Naming, p. 5.
Kripke, Wittgenstein, pp. 7–84.
Ibid., pp. 55–145.
Kripke, Naming, pp. 46, 47, 52–53, 57, 61–62, 126, 142.
Kripke, Wittgenstein, pp. 79, 89, 108–109, 134–135.
Kripke, Naming, pp. 64, 81, 83, 85, 93; Wittgenstein, pp. 67–68.
Kripke, Naming, p. 113, n. 55.
Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, pp. 50–52.
Ibid., pp. 126–30 and 166–80. See Borgmann (2005).
Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, p. 38.
Heidegger (1962).
Nozick (2001). See also p. 155.
Ibid., pp. 148–55.
Heidegger, Die Technik, pp. 21–23.
Heidegger (1978).
Heidegger (1995).
Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, pp. 43–44.
Netting (1981).
See http://www.com/catalog/pfanni-roesti-die-knusprigen-p-232.html, retrieved October 5, 2008.
Borgmann (2006).
References
Borgmann A (1995) Does philosophy matter? Technol Soc 17:295–309
Borgmann A (2005) Technology. In: Dreyfus H, Wrathall M (eds) A companion to Heidegger. Blackwell, Malden, pp 420–432
Borgmann A (2006) Real American ethics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Branch T (1977) New frontiers in American philosophy. New York Times Magazine, August 14, 1977, p 12
Carnap R (1963) The development of my thinking. In: Schilpp A (ed) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, LaSalle, pp 23–24
Heidegger M (1960) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, Niemeyer, p 6
Heidegger M (1962) Die Technik und die Kehre. Neske, Pfullingen
Heidegger M (1978) Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik, Gesamtausgabe, vol 26 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1978 [1928]), pp 24–25
Heidegger M (1989) Beiträge zur Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe, vol 65 (Frankfurt: Klostermann), pp 1936–1938
Heidegger M (1994) Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge, Gesamtausgabe, vol 79 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, [1949 and 1957])
Heidegger M (1995) Feldweg-Gespräche (1944/1945), Gesamtausgabe, vol 77 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1995), pp 6–17
Hughes C (2004) Kripke: names, necessity, and identity. Oxford University Press, New York
Kim J (1989) The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 63, no. 3 (November 1989), p 47
Leiter B (ed) (2004) The future for philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York
McGrath C (2006) Philosopher, 65, lectures not about ‘What Am I?’ but ‘What Is I?’ New York Times, January 28, 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/28/books/28krip.html#. Retrieved 26 Sept 2008
Netting RMC (1981) Balancing on an Alp. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 35–36, Also see 159–168
Nozick R (2001) Invariances. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 120
Reichenbach H (1951) The rise of scientific philosophy. University of California Press, Berkeley, p vii
Rorty R (1982) Consequences of pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, p 221
Soames S (2003) Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weinberg S (1993) Dreams of a final theory. Pantheon, New York, p 166
Wittgenstein L (2001) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge, New York, pp 1922–1923
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borgmann, A. “… or is the question of being at once the most basic and the most concrete?” On the ambitions and responsibilities of contemporary American philosophy. AI & Soc 25, 19–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0238-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0238-x