Skip to main content
Log in

“… or is the question of being at once the most basic and the most concrete?” On the ambitions and responsibilities of contemporary American philosophy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At its centennial in 2001, the American Philosophical Association bravely proclaimed: “Philosophy Matters.” But does it? It won’t unless it reaches the concreteness of everyday life. To do so was Martin Heidegger’s ambition, and one can read Saul Kripke’s books as an attempt to get mainstream American philosophy beyond its abstractions. At length, Kripke’s efforts, on one reading, failed while Heidegger’s remained incomplete. A theory of commodification can get us closer to the things that matter to us in everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Borgmann (1995) and Leiter (2004) among many other accounts.

  2. Heidegger (1960) translations are mine.

  3. Branch (1977) and McGrath (2006).

  4. Soames (2003) and Hughes (2004).

  5. The situation is complicated. Kripke has reservation about metaphysical naturalism, and the one philosopher he has extensively discussed, Wittgenstein, is usually invoked as the founder of the minority analytic school Brian Leiter has called quietism. See Leiter, The Future, pp. 7–19.

  6. Wittgenstein (2001).

  7. Carnap (1963).

  8. Weinberg (1993).

  9. Rorty (1982).

  10. Reichenbach (1951).

  11. Kim (1989).

  12. Kripke, Naming, p. 5.

  13. Kripke, Wittgenstein, pp. 7–84.

  14. Ibid., pp. 55–145.

  15. Kripke, Naming, pp. 46, 47, 52–53, 57, 61–62, 126, 142.

  16. Kripke, Wittgenstein, pp. 79, 89, 108–109, 134–135.

  17. Kripke, Naming, pp. 64, 81, 83, 85, 93; Wittgenstein, pp. 67–68.

  18. Kripke, Naming, p. 113, n. 55.

  19. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, pp. 50–52.

  20. Ibid., pp. 126–30 and 166–80. See Borgmann (2005).

  21. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, p. 38.

  22. Heidegger (1962).

  23. Nozick (2001). See also p. 155.

  24. Ibid., pp. 148–55.

  25. Heidegger, Die Technik, pp. 21–23.

  26. Heidegger (1978).

  27. Heidegger (1995).

  28. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, pp. 43–44.

  29. Heidegger (1989, 1994).

  30. Netting (1981).

  31. See http://www.com/catalog/pfanni-roesti-die-knusprigen-p-232.html, retrieved October 5, 2008.

  32. Borgmann (2006).

References

  • Borgmann A (1995) Does philosophy matter? Technol Soc 17:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2005) Technology. In: Dreyfus H, Wrathall M (eds) A companion to Heidegger. Blackwell, Malden, pp 420–432

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2006) Real American ethics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch T (1977) New frontiers in American philosophy. New York Times Magazine, August 14, 1977, p 12

  • Carnap R (1963) The development of my thinking. In: Schilpp A (ed) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, LaSalle, pp 23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1960) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, Niemeyer, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1962) Die Technik und die Kehre. Neske, Pfullingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1978) Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik, Gesamtausgabe, vol 26 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1978 [1928]), pp 24–25

  • Heidegger M (1989) Beiträge zur Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe, vol 65 (Frankfurt: Klostermann), pp 1936–1938

  • Heidegger M (1994) Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge, Gesamtausgabe, vol 79 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, [1949 and 1957])

  • Heidegger M (1995) Feldweg-Gespräche (1944/1945), Gesamtausgabe, vol 77 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1995), pp 6–17

  • Hughes C (2004) Kripke: names, necessity, and identity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (1989) The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 63, no. 3 (November 1989), p 47

  • Leiter B (ed) (2004) The future for philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath C (2006) Philosopher, 65, lectures not about ‘What Am I?’ but ‘What Is I?’ New York Times, January 28, 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/28/books/28krip.html#. Retrieved 26 Sept 2008

  • Netting RMC (1981) Balancing on an Alp. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 35–36, Also see 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (2001) Invariances. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H (1951) The rise of scientific philosophy. University of California Press, Berkeley, p vii

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1982) Consequences of pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, p 221

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames S (2003) Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg S (1993) Dreams of a final theory. Pantheon, New York, p 166

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (2001) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge, New York, pp 1922–1923

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Borgmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borgmann, A. “… or is the question of being at once the most basic and the most concrete?” On the ambitions and responsibilities of contemporary American philosophy. AI & Soc 25, 19–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0238-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0238-x

Keywords

Navigation