Abstract
This study employs an experiment investigating cognitive mapping of fifth-grade children living in a remote village environment, wherein characteristics of the landscape included paths, landmarks, nodes, edges, and districts. Two aspects of analysis were salient in this study. First, important landscape characteristics and their frequency of appearance in the cognitive maps were tabulated and illustrated as a layout map. Second, inaccurate cognitive maps were structurally analyzed to account for any incompleteness, distortions, and augmentation of actual environments found in some map samples. Focus on gender differences in children’s environmental cognition in terms of symbolic representation skills utilized in cognitive mapping is of special interest in this case study. Results confirm Piaget’s theory that older children, aged ten or more, begin to use projective and Euclidean concepts. Furthermore, boys used a greater variety of symbols to represent a particular landscape characteristic, a cultural temple, than did the girls. Finally, we hypothesize that the ‘hunter–gatherer’ social divisions of labor between men and women in the village’s early historical social structure are consequentially related to gender discrepancies in cognitive mapping symbolic representation skills, in non-English-speaking children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander DE (2004) Cognitive mapping as an emergency management training exercise. J Conting Crisis Manag 12(4):150–159
Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy and practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Bell PA, Greene TC, Fisher JD, Baum A (2001) Environmental psychology. Thomson Learning, California
Blaut JM (1997) The mapping abilities of young children. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 87(1):152–158
Cardoso-Junior MM, Scarpel RA (2012) Cognitive structure of occupational risks represented by a perceptual map. Work 41(2012):3196–3201
Chambers R (2006) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is the empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electron J Inform Syst Dev Ctries 25(2):1–11
Coeterier JF (1996) Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of Dutch landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 34:27–44
Eckersely R (2004) The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. MIT Press, Cambridge
Fenster T (2009) Cognitive temporal mapping: the three steps method in urban planning. Plan Theory Pract 10(4):479–498
Gillespie CA (2010) How culture constructs our sense of neighborhood: mental maps and children’s perceptions of place. J Geogr 109:18–29
Herman JF, Siegel AW (1978) The development of cognitive mapping of the large-scale environment. J Exp Child Psychol 26:389–406
Huang YY (2005) Cognitive map as a tool for understanding relationships between community spatial and residents: a case study of Chung-Shing Village. Master thesis, National Dong Hwa University, Graduate Institute of Environmental Policy. National Dong Hwa University, Hualien (in Chinese)
Huynh NT, Hall GB, Doherty S, Smith WW (2008) Interpreting urban space through cognitive map sketching and sequence analysis. Can Geogr 52(2):222–240
Kaplan R (1991) Environmental description and prediction: a conceptual analysis. In: Garling T, Evans GW (eds) Environment, cognition, and action: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, New York
Lin MJ (2005) Development of social indicators for forest ecosystem management in Lukuei region. Master thesis, National Dong Hwa University, Graduate Institute of Environmental Policy. National Dong Hwa University, Hualien (in Chinese)
Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge
Lynch K (1973) Some references to orientation. In: Downs RM, Stea D (eds) Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine, Chicago
Mitchell R, Jack B, McQuade W (1999) Mapping the cognitive environment of a residency: an exploratory study of a maternal and child health rotation. Teach Learn Med 11(1):6–11
Orleans P (1968) Differential cognition of urban residents: effects of social scale on mapping. In: 63rd annual meeting of American Society of Architecture, Boston, MA, pp 115–130
Pearce LP, Fagence M (1996) The legacy of Kevin Lynch research implications. Ann Tour Res 23(3):576–598
Piaget J, Inhelder B (1967) The child’s conception of space. Northon, New York
Robiglio V, Mala WA (2005) Integrating local and expert knowledge using participatory mapping and GIS to implement integrated forest management options in Akok, Cameroon. For Chron 81(3):392–397
Sheppard SRJ (2005) Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environ Sci Policy 8:637–654
Webley P, Whalley A (2001) Sex differences in children’s environmental cognition. J Soc Psychol 127(2):223–225
Acknowledgments
This research project (project number: 94AS-11.3.2-Forestry-G1-1) was supported by the national governmental program ‘Integrating Forest Ecosystem Management and Community Development—Lukuei Community Forestry Management And Development Model (2/5)’ of the Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Republic of China (Taiwan).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, HJ., Wu, CS., Huang, YY. et al. Mapping the cognitive environment of fifth graders: an empirical analysis for use in environmental planning. AI & Soc 29, 355–362 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0459-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0459-x