Skip to main content
Log in

Embodied cognition and the Orwell’s problem in cognitive science

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embodied approach to cognition has taken roots in cognitive studies with developments in diverse fields such as robotics, artificial life and cognitive linguistics. Taking cue from the metaphor of a Watt governor, this approach stresses on the coupling between the organism and the environment and the continuous nature of the cognitive processes. This results in questioning the viability of computational–representational understanding of mind as a comprehensive theory of cognition. The paper, after giving an overview of embodied approach based on some examples from conceptual metaphor theory, looks into a special case of Orwell’s problem in cognitive science. The problem is that there is so much evidence for embodiment to be true, yet there is little understanding of the same. I shall try to solve this problem by pointing out that it is our inveterate habits of perceiving ourselves that makes the embodied approach appear implausible. Studies on free will as well as the importance of the unconscious in overall cognitive processing raise challenging questions on our self-conception. A revision in the self-conception in the light of these findings will pave the way for a better appreciation of the embodied approach to cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albahari M (2006) Analytical buddhism; the two-tiered illusion of self. Palgrave McMillan, Houndsmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1986) Knowledge of language. Praeger Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (1999) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardenfors P (2000) Conceptual spaces: the geometry of thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1962) Being and time (trans: Macquarrie J, Robinson E). S.C.M. Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau P (1963) The structure of behavior (trans: Fisher AL). Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G (1949) Nineteen eighty four. Martin Secker and Warburg Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf BL (1956) Language, thought and reality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M (2002) Six views on embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Hari Narayanan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hari Narayanan, V. Embodied cognition and the Orwell’s problem in cognitive science. AI & Soc 30, 193–197 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0496-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0496-5

Keywords

Navigation