Abstract
In this paper, I develop and differentiate some problems of the interaction between corporations, individuals and the general public as well as institutions like the state or international non-governmental organizations as well as super-national organizations. Firms or corporations are nowadays much more international than they used to be; they are typically multinational enterprises giving rise to special transnational problems of transactions, interchanges and—indeed also—responsibilities ranging over national borders and restricted areas. In our culture, we have to deal with rather ramified types of individual and collective as well as specific corporate responsibilities tending to reach out beyond national borders, specific state law restrictions and even business systems and economies. The traditional personal and individual responsibility and their different forms will not do to cope with all the respective international, intercultural and inter-sectoral problems of modern corporations and their international interactions. In the paper, I have also discussed the question: Do multinational organizations and corporations have a sort of specific corporate responsibility, and if so, against whom and for what—except for their share- and stakeholders?
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Corporate social responsibility is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility (ISO 26000—Social responsibility), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26000 and http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm (Accessed on Nov 21 2015).
Directive/374/EEC—liability for defective products. http://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/council-directive-85-374-eec (Accessed on Nov 21 2015).
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, USA) IEEE CODE OF ETHICS www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html (Accessed on Nov 21, 2015).
References
Bühl WL (1998) Verantwortung für soziale systeme. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart
Eddy R, Potter E, Page B (1976) Destination disaster. Quadrangle/New York Times Book Co, New York
European Agency and Health at Work (1985) Directive/374/EEC—liability for defective products. http://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/council-directive-85-374-eec. Accessed 21 Nov 2015
French PA (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia UP, New York
Giere RN (1990) Explaining science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248
Hart HLA (1968) Punishment and responsibility. Clarendon, Oxford
Heidbrink L (2003) Kritik der Verantwortung. Velbrück, Weilerswist
Hennessey JW, Gert B (1985) Moral rules and moral ideals: a useful distinction in business and professional practice. J Bus Ethics 4:105–115
Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kant I (1968) Kants Werke (Akademie-Textausgabe). De Gruyter, Berlin
Ladd J (1975) The ethics of participation. Nomos 16:98–125
Lenk H (1979) Pragmatische Vernunft. Reclam, Stuttgart
Lenk H (1982) Zur Sozialphilosophie der Technik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
Lenk H (1988) Distributability problems and challenges to the future resolution of responsibility conflicts. Philos Technol 3(4):1–25. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v3_n4/lenk.html
Lenk H (1988b) Konkrete Humanität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
Lenk H (ed) (1991) Wissenschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart
Lenk H (1992) Zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
Lenk H (2003) Responsibility and risk minimization: outline of an attribution-based approach regarding modern technological and societal systems. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 13(3):203–222
Lenk H (2005/2015a, 2nd ed) Responsibility: German perspectives. In Mitcham C (ed) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics, vol 3. Thompson-Gale, Detroit, pp 1618–1623; (2nd ed. by) Holbrook B, Mitcham C (2015) Ethics, science, technology, and engineering, vol 3. Gale-Centage Learning, Farmington Hills, pp 610–616
Lenk H (2007) Global technoscience and responsibility. LIT, Berlin
Lenk H (2010) Das flexible Vielfachwesen. Velbrück, Weilerswist
Lenk H (2015b) Human-soziale Verantwortung. Zur Sozialphilosophie der Verantwortlichkeiten. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg
Lenk H (2016) Typologien, Arten und Polaritäten (working title). In: Heidbrink L, Langbehn C, Sombetzki J (eds) Handbuch Verantwortung. Springer, Wiesbaden (forthcoming)
Lenk H, Maring M (1990) Responsibility for land use and the problem of social traps. In: Fitch DBS, Pikalo A (eds) Socio-economic Aspects of Land Use Planning. Lang, Frankfurt/M, pp 31–50
Lenk H, Maring M (eds) (1991) Technikverantwortung. Güterabwägung Riskiobewertung - Verhaltenskodizes. Lang, Frankfurt/M
Lenk H, Maring M (eds) (1992) Wirtschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart
Lenk H, Maring M (1996a) Responsibility and social traps. Int J Appl Philos 1:51–61
Lenk H, Maring M (1996b) Engineering between can and ought. Interdiscip Sci Rev 21:316–323
Lenk H, Maring M (2001) Responsibility and technology. In: Auhagen A, Bierhoff H-W (eds) Responsibility—the many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, London, pp 93–107
Lenk H, Ropohl G (eds) (1987, 1993) Technik und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart
Maring M (2001) Kollektive und korporative Verantwortung. LIT, Münster
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic, New York
Simon HA (1951) Models of man. Wiley, New York
Simon HA (1979) Models of thought. Yale, New Haven
Werhane PH (1985) Persons, rights, and corporations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Acknowledgments
The paper is of enormous significance to the special issue “Philosophy of Technological Culture” in several ways. The ethics of responsibilities distributions play a crucial role in enforcing a paradigm in the critical development of science and technology which seems to open a perspective for the philosophy of technology and culture. The ethics of responsibilities distributions is of vital importance for our technological culture—Note from the Guest Editor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenk, H. Ethics of responsibilities distributions in a technological culture. AI & Soc 32, 219–231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0642-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0642-3