Abstract
The use of WhatsApp as a means of communication is widespread amongst today’s youth, many of whom spent hours in virtual space, in particular during the evenings and nighttime in the privacy of their own homes. This article seeks to contribute to the discussion of the dialogical language and “conversations” conducted in virtual-space encounters and the way in which young people perceive this space, its affect on them, and their interrelations within it. It presents the findings of a study based on a community of philosophical inquiry in which young adults students discussed the “I” and “Thou” (the other) and the interaction between them in a WhatsApp community. The results evince that the youth related to the virtual space in very similar fashion to Buber’s “I–Thou” concept, the language they employed to describe what happened in it enabling an expansion of the conceptualization and research language to an “I-Space-Thou” model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avnon D (1998) Martin Buber: the hidden dialogue. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham
Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity, Cambridge
Boyd D (2007) Why youth ♥ social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed) MacArthur foundation series on digital learning: youth, identity, and digital media volume. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 119–142
Buber M (1962) Werke. Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie. Lambert Schneider, Munich/Heidelberg
Buber M (1970) I and thou. Trans. W. Kauffman. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York
Buber M (2004) Between man and man. Routledge, London
Cavus N, Ibrahim D (2009) M-learning: an experiment using SMS to support learning new English language words. Br J Educ Technol 40(1):78–91
Choudhary SR, Momin MIH, Kantharia SL (2015) Facebook and WhatsApp: beneficial or harmful? J Evid Based Med Healthc 2(17):2306–2311
Churchill D (2009) Educational applications of Web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. Br J Educ Technol 40(1):179–183
Guilherme A (2015) Michel Serres’ Le Parasite and Martin Buber’s I and Thou: Noise in informal education affecting dialogue between communities in conflict in the Middle East. Educ Philos Theory. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1031066
Guilherme A, Morgan WJ (2009) Martin Buber’s philosophy of education and its implications for adult non-formal education. Int J Lifelong Educ 28:565–581
Haynes JM, Murris K (2012) Picturebooks, pedagogy and philosophy. Routledge, New York
Haynes J, Murris K (2013) The realm of meaning: imagination, narrative and playfulness in philosophical exploration with young children. Early Child Dev Care 183(8):1084–1100
Heidegger M (1927). Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1978)
Horwitz R (1978) Buber’s way to I and thou: an historical analysis. Lambert Schneider, Heidelberg
Kavka M (2012) Verification (Bewahrung) in Martin Buber. J Jew Thought Philos 20(1):71–98
Kennedy K (2010) Philosophical dialogues with children: essays on theory and practice. The Edwin Mellon Press, Lewiston
Kizel A (2015a) “Life goes on even if there’s a gravestone”: philosophy with children and adolescents on virtual memorial sites. Child Philos 10(20):421–443
Kizel A (2015b) Philosophy with children, the poverty line, and socio-philosophic sensitivity. Child Philos 11(21):139–162
Kohan WO (2014) Philosophy and childhood: critical perspectives and affirmative practices. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Levy M, Kennedy C (2005) Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In: Kukulshka-Hulme A, Traxler J (eds) Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge, London, pp 76–83
Lipman M (1988) Philosophy goes to school. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Lipman M (1991) Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lipman M, Sharp AM, Oscanyan FS (1980) Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Lu M (2008) Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. J Comput Assist Learn 24:515–525
Lyle S, Thomas-Williams J (2011) Dialogic practice in primary schools: how primary head teachers plan to embed philosophy for children into the whole school. Educ Stud 38(1):1–12
Matthews G (1984) Dialogues with children. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Matthews G (1994) The philosophy of childhood. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Mohr Lone J (2012a). Teaching pre-college philosophy: The cultivation of philosophical sensitivity. In Mohr Lone J, Israrloff R (eds) Philosophy and education: introducing philosophy to young people. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, pp 12–22
Mohr Lone J (2012b) The philosophical child. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Morgan WJ, Guilherme A (2013) Buber and education: dialogue as conflict resolution. Routledge, London
Murris K (2000) Can children do philosophy? J Philos Educ 34(2):261–279
Murris K (2001) Are children natural philosophers? Teach Think 5:46–49
Murris K (2008) Philosophy with Children, the stingray and the educative value of disequilibrium. J Philos Educ 42(3-4):667–685
Olsen G (2004) Dialogue, phenomenology and ethical communication theory. Proceedings of the Durham-Bergen Postgraduate Philosophy Seminar, II, 13–26
Sharp, A. (1988). What is a community of inquiry? In J. Portelli and W. Hare (eds) Philosophy and education. Detselig Enterprise, Calgary, pp 207–25
Splitter L, Sharp AM (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of enquiry. Acer, Melbourne
Stawarska B (2009) Between you and I: dialogical phenomenology. Ohio University Press, Athens
Theunissen M (1984) The other: studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Trans. C. Macann. MIT Press, Cambridge
Trickey S, Topping KJ (2004) ‘Philosophy for children’: a systematic review. Res Pap Educ 19(3):365–380
Wartenberg TE (2009). Big ideas for little kids: Teaching philosophy through children’s literature. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Lanham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kizel, A. I–Thou dialogical encounters in adolescents’ WhatsApp virtual communities. AI & Soc 34, 19–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0692-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0692-9