Skip to main content
Log in

I–Thou dialogical encounters in adolescents’ WhatsApp virtual communities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of WhatsApp as a means of communication is widespread amongst today’s youth, many of whom spent hours in virtual space, in particular during the evenings and nighttime in the privacy of their own homes. This article seeks to contribute to the discussion of the dialogical language and “conversations” conducted in virtual-space encounters and the way in which young people perceive this space, its affect on them, and their interrelations within it. It presents the findings of a study based on a community of philosophical inquiry in which young adults students discussed the “I” and “Thou” (the other) and the interaction between them in a WhatsApp community. The results evince that the youth related to the virtual space in very similar fashion to Buber’s “I–Thou” concept, the language they employed to describe what happened in it enabling an expansion of the conceptualization and research language to an “I-Space-Thou” model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avnon D (1998) Martin Buber: the hidden dialogue. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D (2007) Why youth ♥ social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed) MacArthur foundation series on digital learning: youth, identity, and digital media volume. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M (1962) Werke. Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie. Lambert Schneider, Munich/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M (1970) I and thou. Trans. W. Kauffman. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M (2004) Between man and man. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavus N, Ibrahim D (2009) M-learning: an experiment using SMS to support learning new English language words. Br J Educ Technol 40(1):78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary SR, Momin MIH, Kantharia SL (2015) Facebook and WhatsApp: beneficial or harmful? J Evid Based Med Healthc 2(17):2306–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill D (2009) Educational applications of Web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. Br J Educ Technol 40(1):179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme A (2015) Michel Serres’ Le Parasite and Martin Buber’s I and Thou: Noise in informal education affecting dialogue between communities in conflict in the Middle East. Educ Philos Theory. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1031066

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme A, Morgan WJ (2009) Martin Buber’s philosophy of education and its implications for adult non-formal education. Int J Lifelong Educ 28:565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes JM, Murris K (2012) Picturebooks, pedagogy and philosophy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J, Murris K (2013) The realm of meaning: imagination, narrative and playfulness in philosophical exploration with young children. Early Child Dev Care 183(8):1084–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1927). Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz R (1978) Buber’s way to I and thou: an historical analysis. Lambert Schneider, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka M (2012) Verification (Bewahrung) in Martin Buber. J Jew Thought Philos 20(1):71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy K (2010) Philosophical dialogues with children: essays on theory and practice. The Edwin Mellon Press, Lewiston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizel A (2015a) “Life goes on even if there’s a gravestone”: philosophy with children and adolescents on virtual memorial sites. Child Philos 10(20):421–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizel A (2015b) Philosophy with children, the poverty line, and socio-philosophic sensitivity. Child Philos 11(21):139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohan WO (2014) Philosophy and childhood: critical perspectives and affirmative practices. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Kennedy C (2005) Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In: Kukulshka-Hulme A, Traxler J (eds) Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge, London, pp 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman M (1988) Philosophy goes to school. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman M (1991) Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman M, Sharp AM, Oscanyan FS (1980) Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu M (2008) Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. J Comput Assist Learn 24:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle S, Thomas-Williams J (2011) Dialogic practice in primary schools: how primary head teachers plan to embed philosophy for children into the whole school. Educ Stud 38(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G (1984) Dialogues with children. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G (1994) The philosophy of childhood. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr Lone J (2012a). Teaching pre-college philosophy: The cultivation of philosophical sensitivity. In Mohr Lone J, Israrloff R (eds) Philosophy and education: introducing philosophy to young people. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, pp 12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr Lone J (2012b) The philosophical child. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WJ, Guilherme A (2013) Buber and education: dialogue as conflict resolution. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murris K (2000) Can children do philosophy? J Philos Educ 34(2):261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murris K (2001) Are children natural philosophers? Teach Think 5:46–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris K (2008) Philosophy with Children, the stingray and the educative value of disequilibrium. J Philos Educ 42(3-4):667–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen G (2004) Dialogue, phenomenology and ethical communication theory. Proceedings of the Durham-Bergen Postgraduate Philosophy Seminar, II, 13–26

  • Sharp, A. (1988). What is a community of inquiry? In J. Portelli and W. Hare (eds) Philosophy and education. Detselig Enterprise, Calgary, pp 207–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Splitter L, Sharp AM (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of enquiry. Acer, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Stawarska B (2009) Between you and I: dialogical phenomenology. Ohio University Press, Athens

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen M (1984) The other: studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Trans. C. Macann. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickey S, Topping KJ (2004) ‘Philosophy for children’: a systematic review. Res Pap Educ 19(3):365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg TE (2009). Big ideas for little kids: Teaching philosophy through children’s literature. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arie Kizel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kizel, A. I–Thou dialogical encounters in adolescents’ WhatsApp virtual communities. AI & Soc 34, 19–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0692-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0692-9

Keywords

Navigation