Skip to main content
Log in

Coping with Descartes’ error in information systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coming from Hubert Dreyfus’ recent book ‘‘Retrieving Realism” (together with Charles Taylor), the paper presents embodied pre-conceptual perception and representational cognition as two contrasting perspectives on accessing the world. It further characterises the ‘different forms of knowledge emerging from these perspectives and how they dynamically relate to each other. Taking up the Peircean theory of signs and abductive reasoning as methods of discovery, computers are analysed as semiotic machines that formally model and objectify explicit knowledge about social practices and that can be embedded in the sign processes of thereby restructured practices. This practice theoretical perspective allows for both, understanding the limits of AI and pointing to options for productively combining the performance of ‘‘cognitive artifacts” with the tacit skills of knowledge workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson G (1980) Mind and nature. A necessary unity. Bantam Books, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (2009) The misery of digital organisations and the semiotic nature of IT. AI Soc 23:331–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (2017) ‘‘Super-intelligent” machine: technological exuberance or the road to subjection, AI & Society Journal of Knowledge, Culture an Communication 2017 (Online first)

  • Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason and the human brain. G.P. Putnam’s Son, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H (2002) Intelligence without representation—Merleau–Ponty’s critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1986) Mind over Machine. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL, Taylor C (2015) Retrieving Realism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki R-L (eds) (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Göranzon B, Josefson I (eds) (1988) Knowledge, skill and artificial intelligence. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1962) Being and time. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1970) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy, transl. by David Carr, Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press

  • Kelly JE (2015) Computing, cognition and the future of knowing. How humans and machines are forging a new age of understanding. IBM, Somers

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1992) The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nake F, Grabowski S (2001) Human–computer interaction viewed as pseudo-communication. Knowl Based Syst 14:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine, reading. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth W (2002) Semiotic Machines. Cybern Hum Know 9(1):5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1903) A syllabus of certain topics of logic. Alfred Mudge & Son, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1935) Lectures on pragmatism. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds) Collected papers of charles sanders peirce CP 5.141–5.212. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1988) Representation and reality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z (1984) Computation and cognition. Towards a foundation of cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M, Brödner P, Stevens G, Betz M, Wulf V (2016) Grounded design—a praxeological IS research perspective, JIT 2016.5 AOP

  • Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (2010) Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions. The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2008) Origins of human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2014) A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition. A new foundation for design. Ablex Publ, Norwood

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (2009) Philosohical investigations. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Brödner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brödner, P. Coping with Descartes’ error in information systems. AI & Soc 34, 203–213 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0798-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0798-8

Keywords

Navigation