Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

AI Ethics: how can information ethics provide a framework to avoid usual conceptual pitfalls? An Overview

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays an important role in current discussions on information and communication technologies (ICT) and new modes of algorithmic governance. It is an unavoidable dimension of what social mediations and modes of reproduction of our information societies will be in the future. While several works in artificial intelligence ethics (AIE) address ethical issues specific to certain areas of expertise, these ethical reflections often remain confined to narrow areas of application, without considering the global ethical issues in which they are embedded. We, therefore, propose to clarify the main approaches to AIE, their philosophical assumptions and the specific characteristics of each one of them, to identify the most promising approach to develop an ethical reflection on the deployment of AI in our societies, which is the one based on information ethics as proposed by Luciano Floridi. We will identify the most important features of that approach to highlight areas that need further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter A (2018) Irresistible, the rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ananny M, Crawford K (2016) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc 20(3):973–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) (2011) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic M (2013) Infoglut, how too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Awad E (2018) The moral machine experiment. Nature 563:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengio Y, Luccioni S (2019) On the morality of artificial intelligence. arXiv:1912.11945 [cs.CY], December 2019.

  • Boddington P (2017) Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence, paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin E (2006) Biais cognitifs et recherche d'information sur internet. Quelles perspectives pour les indicateurs de pertinence des moteurs de recherche. VSST 2006. https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00827309/document. Accessed 18 Jan 2019

  • Brey P (2010) Values in technology and disclosive computer Ethics. In: Floridi L (ed) The cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broussard M (2018) Artificial unintelligence, how computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneault F (2012) Comment définir une éthique pour notre civilisation technologique? L’apport d’une lecture conjointe des pensées de Karl-Otto Apel et Hans Jonas. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 68(2):335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson JJ (2019) The past decade and future of AI’s impact on society. In: Towards a new enlightenment? BBVA. bbvaopenmind.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/BBVA-OpenMind-book-2019-Towards-a-New-Enlightenment-A-Trascendent-Decade-3.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2020

  • Bucher T (2018) If… then, algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney-Lippold J (2017) We are data, algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (2012) Configuring the networked self, law, code, and the play of everyday practice. Yale University Press, New Haven, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa L (2016) Virtuality and capabilities in a world of ambient intelligence, new challenges to privacy and data protection. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Filippi P (2016) Gouvernance algorithmique: vie privée et autonomie individuelle à l’ère des Big Data. In: Primavera De Filippi & Danièle Bourcier (dir.). Open Data & Data Protection : Nouveaux défis pour la vie privée. Mare and Martin.

  • De Grosbois P (2018) Les Batailles d’Internet, Assauts et résistances à l’ère du capitalisme numérique. Écosociété, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J (2009) Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies, communicative capitalism and left politics. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dignum V (2019) Responsible artificial intelligence. How to develop and use ai in a responsible way. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Domingos P (2015) The master algorithm, how the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg A (1991) Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg A (2010) Between reason and experience. essays in technology and modernity. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (1999) Philosophy and computing, an introduction. Routledge, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2013) The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2014) The 4th revolution, how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (ed) (2015) The onlife manifesto, being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag M (2003) La dissolution systémique du monde réel dans l’univers virtuel des nouvelles technologies de la communication informatique : une critique ontologique et anthropologique. Dans Mattelart, A. et Tremblay, G. (dir.) 2001 Bogues: communication, démocratie et globalisation. tome 4, Québec : Presses de l’Université Laval, pp 279–296.

  • Freitag M (2018) La société informatique et le respect des formes. Le Naufrage de l’université et autres essais d’épistémologie politique. Alias, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • George É, Kane O (2015) Les technologies numériques au prisme des approches critiques: éléments pour l’ébauche d’une rencontre. Can J Commun 40:727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert M (2020) Faire la morale aux robots: une introduction à l’éthique des algorithmes. Atelier 10, Montréal

  • Hansen MBN (2006) Bodies in code, interfaces with digital media. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunyadi M (2018) Le temps du posthumanisme, un diagnostic d’époque. Les Belles Lettres, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E (2019) The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. Nature Mach Intell 1:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2017a) Reframing ai discourse. Mind Mach 27(4):575–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2017b) AI Anxiety. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 68(9):2267–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1979) Das prinzip verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (2007) Humanité 2.0. La bible du changement. M21 Éditions, Paris

  • Levesque HJ (2017) Common sense, the turing test, and the quest for real aI. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maclure J (2019) The new ai spring: a deflationary view. AI Soc J Knowl Cult Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00912-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclure J, Saint-Pierre M-N (2018) Le nouvel âge de l’intelligence artificielle: une synthèse des enjeux éthiques. Les Cahiers de Propriété Intellectuelle 30(3):741–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schönberger V (2014) La révolution big data. Politique Étrangère 4:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt B (2019) Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical Ai. Nature: 501–507.

  • Mondoux A (2011) Identité numérique et surveillance. Les Cahiers du numérique 7(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondoux A, Ménard M (2018) Big data et société, industrialisation des médiations symboliques. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  • More M (1990) Transhumanism: towards a futurist philosophy. Extropy 6. http://fennetic.net/irc/extropy/ext6.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2020

  • Morozov E (2013) To save everything, click here. PublicAffairs Books, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policyand the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlaken I, van den Hoven J (eds) (2012) The capability approach, technology and design. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet M (2015) Big data et quantification de soi : la gouvernementalité algorithmique dans le monde numériquement administré. Can J Commun 40:597–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet M (2016) La révolution culturelle du capital, le capitalisme cybernétique dans la société globale de l’information. Écosociété, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale F (2015) The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rouvroy A, Berns T (2013) Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation. Réseaux. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouvroy A, Stiegler B (2015) Le régime de vérité numérique. Socio. 4. https://journals.openedition.org/socio/1251; https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.1251. Accessed 18 Aug 2019

  • Russell S (2019) Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl BC (2007) Ontology, life-world, and responsibility in IS. In: Sharman R, Kishore R, Ramesh R (eds) Ontologies: a handbook of principles, concepts and applications in information systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind J (2018) Future politics, living together in a world transformed by tech. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A (2014) Démocratie.com, pouvoir, culture et résistance à l’ère des géants de la Silicon Valley. Lux, Montréal

  • Tegmark M (2017) Life 3.0, being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2005) The second self: computers and the human spirit. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven J (2010) The use of normative theories in computer ethics. The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker M (2019) Artificial intelligence: societal and ethical implications. In: United States house of representatives committee on science, space, and technology. June 26. https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Whittaker%2520Testimony.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  • Wiener N (1954) The human use of human beings, cybernetics and society. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Stahl BC (2011) Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to sen’s capability approach? Ethics Inf Technol 13(2):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collège André-Laurendeau, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Frédérick Bruneault & Andréane Sabourin Laflamme

  2. Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Frédérick Bruneault

Authors
  1. Frédérick Bruneault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andréane Sabourin Laflamme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérick Bruneault.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruneault, F., Laflamme, A.S. AI Ethics: how can information ethics provide a framework to avoid usual conceptual pitfalls? An Overview. AI & Soc 36, 757–766 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01077-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01077-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation