Skip to main content
Log in

After the “new aesthetic”: a short history of the cybernetic turn in Brazil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I explore a short history of exchange between cybernetics and aesthetics in Brazil, beginning with the reception of Max Bense’s “new aesthetic” by concrete and neo-concrete poets and artists. I focus on his intellectual exchange with the poet and literary critic Haroldo de Campos, who promoted Bense’s information aesthetics in Brazil throughout the 1960s to tell a little-known history of cybernetic theory wedded to aesthetic practice, demonstrating the role that Brazilian critics, writers and artists played in mediating and deviating from some of the major tenants of first-order cybernetics. Rather than embracing the total “entropy” of meaning that characterized Bense’s “generative aesthetics”, Brazilian poets and artists drew upon cybernetics and information theory to produce artistic works that engaged figuration, bodies, politics, spectatorship and participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a discussion of Brazilian art and new media during the dictatorship ears see Stromberg (2016) and Calirman (2012).

  2. For a discussion of collaborations between Cordeiro and Moscati, with special attention given to the Derivadas de uma imagem series, see Price (2012).

  3. For a historical discussion of Cordeiro’s theories of aesthetic form in connection with his Marxist orientation see Nelson (2020).

  4. For a discussion of Bense in Brazil see Walther-Bense (1996), Nobre (2015), Neubauer (2018), Wrobel (2019) and Wolfson (2015, 2018a, b).

  5. See Franklin (2021).

  6. De Campos's (1981) article refers specifically to Swiss concrete art. However, the movement of concrete aesthetics to which it refers was intertwined with the Hochschule für Gestaltung, the Ulm school of design. The Swiss connection is to the founder of the design school, Max Bill, who was trained at the Bauhaus and spent his adult life mainly in Germany.

  7. In an article, entitled “Hegel Poeta” (1997), which addressed Bense’s literary experiments that rewrote a section of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit under strict quantitative limitations regarding word-length, de Campos referred to the German philosopher as “bereft of pertinence” (destituído de pertinência) (de Campos, 1997, p. 69).

  8. On his notion of “generative aesthetics,” Bense wrote: “Generative aesthetics therefore implies a combination of all operations, rules and theorems which can be used deliberately to produce aesthetic states (both distributions and configurations) when applied to a set of material elements. Hence generative aesthetics is analogous to generative grammar, in so far as it helps to formulate the principles of a grammatical schema–realizations of an aesthetic structure” (Reichardt 1971 57). The theory of “generative aesthetics” had a practical application to the first algorithmically generated artworks.

  9. See Pamela Lee’s lucid discussion of Norbert Wiener’s own “discomforted” treatment of art as a cybernetic system (2004, p. 247).

  10. Plaza, who immigrated to São Paulo in 1973 became an important presence in the local art circuit as an artist, professor, and curator, as well as an early theorist of the concept of “network”, which he developed in his exhibitions on new media, communication and the circulation of art in partnership with curator Walter Zanini. His collaborations with Augusto de Campos include the earlier Poemóbiles (1968–1974).

  11. See João Cabral de Melo Neto’s poem “Acompanhando Max Bense em sua visita a Brasília, 1961 (Cabral 1995, p. 371).

  12. Before ESDI, there were two design courses in Brazil. The first was established by architects Lina Bo Bardi and Pietro Maria Bardi at the Instituto de Arte Contemporânea (IAC) of the Museu de Arte de São Paulo (MASP) between 1951 and 1953, and the second at the Escola de Artes Plásticas, Universidade Mineira de Arte (UMA) in 1955. For a discussion of the relation between the IAC and ESDI, see Anastassakis (2014).

  13. For an account of Max Bill’s presence in Brazil, and his activities with the Fundação Biennial de São Paulo, see Nelson (2012).

  14. For a detailed historical account of ESDI’s formation see Souza.

  15. Upon returning to São Paulo from Ulm, Alexandre Wollner joined Karlheinz Bergmiller, Max Bill’s the former assistant, and graphic artist Rubem Martins, to launch the design studio Forminform.

  16. See Nobre (2012) and Lopes Filho and Hartkopf (2018).

  17. When Décio Pignatari met Eugen Gomringer in 1956, Gomringer was Max Bill’s assistant and was editor of the magazine Spiral, dedicated to European avant-garde art, principally concrete art.

  18. After teaching at Ulm from 1954 to 1958, Max Bense moved to the Technical University of Stuttgart, where he was a professor of philosophy and headed what became known as the “Stuttgart School,” an artistic group dedicated to Concrete aesthetics and later, in the 1960s, to the incorporation of computer programming in art. Bense and his assistant Elizabeth Walther-Bense, a semiotician and literary critic, also promoted German avant-garde literature and visual art through their Stuttgart-based magazines Augenblick and rot.

  19. Thanks are owed to Jose-Carlos Mariategui for noting that by the time the Studiengalerie des Studium Generale closed in 1978, Bense had presented ninety-one exhibitions.

  20. Bense’s book Brasilanische Intelligenz: eine cartesianische Reflexion was published Brazil as Inteligência Brasileira: una reflexao cartesiana by the publisher Cosac Naify in 2009.

  21. In correspondence with Bense, de Campos says that his article is probably “the first critical piece in the Americas on Bense’s work.” However, Roch Duval notes that an earlier review of a Spanish translation of the first volume of Bense’s Aesthetica (under the title Estética: consideraciones metafisicas sobre lo bello) was published by the Brazilian author Heitor Martins in The Suplemento Dominical do Jornal do Brasil (17 November 1957) (Duval 2015, p.140).

  22. Translations from Portuguese and German to English, unless otherwise noted, are my own.

  23. This shift recalled de Campos’s description of a shift in concrete poetry, as argued in his 1958 “Da fenomenologia da composição à matemática da composição” [“From the Phenomenology of Composition to the Mathematics of Composition”] from “phenomenological” to “mathematical” stages.

  24. In his Einführung in die informationstheoretische Ästhetik (1969), which de Campos translated as Pequena estética (1971), Bense defined the chaogenous state, or the entropy state, as a “regular distribution of signs” corresponding to the following series: S1, S2, S3, … S; n 1/n, 1/n, 1/n, … 1/n. (De Campos 2003, p. 127).

  25. In de Campos’s article “Poesia concreta-linguagem-comunicação” (1957) (De Campos et al. 2006) he laid out a discussion of syntax that recalled the “general semantics” of the philosopher Alfred Korzybski, the thrust of which described the limitations of human knowledge as a direct function of the structure of language.

  26. This fictional program prefigures later “real” computer applications that sort and combine letters, such as Waldemar Cordeiro and Giorgio Moscoti’s Beabá (1968). See Price (2012).

  27. Bernhard Siegert describes Bense’s algorithmically-generated radio-play, “vielleicht zunächst wirklich nur: der monolog der terry jo im mercy hospital” as follows: “a technological muse’s mouth that gives birth to language… employing random selections from a repertory of events with differing frequencies. It, the radio, speaks” (2007, p. 31). For a detailed account of these and other works produced by the Stuttgart School, see Beals (2018).

  28. See Cordeiro’s catalogue essay “Arte concreta semântica” (1964) for his exhibition of the same name, in which he discusses “new figuration” as a corrective to concrete art’s earlier “pragmatic” and “utopian” concern with “infrastructure”.

  29. For a discussion of this change in Bense’s valuation of information see Beals (2020).

References

  • Adorno T (1974) Der Essay als Form. Gesammelte Schriften XI. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

  • Anagnost A (2019) Limitless museum: P. M. Bardi’s aesthetic reeducation. Modernism/modernity 26(4):687–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassakis Z (2014) Triunfos e impasses: Lina Bo Bardi, Aloísio Magalães e o design no Brasil esign No Brasil. Lamparina.

  • Ashby RW (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beals K (2018) ‘Do the new poets think? It’s possible’: computer poetry and cyborg subjectivity. Configurations 26:149–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beals K (2020) Concrete constructions: assembling a postwar poetics. J Lusophone Stud 5(1):93–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Benezra K (2020) Dematerialization: art and design in Latin America. UC Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts P (2007) The authority of everyday objects: a cultural history of West German industrial design. UC Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense M (1947) Über den Essay und seine Prosa. Merkur 3(1):414–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense M (1961) Bestandteile des vorüber. Dünnschliffe mischtexte montagen. Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense M (1962) Theorie der Texte: Eine Einführung in neuere Auf-fassungen und Methoden. Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense M (1965) Aesthetica Einführung in die neue Aesthetik. Agis-Verlag, Baden-Baden

  • Bense M (2007) Aesthetica: introduction à la nouvelle esthétique. Trans. Judith Yacar. Cerf, Paris

  • Bense M (2009) Brazilian intelligence: a Cartesian reflection. Trans. Tercio Redondo. Cosac Naify, São Paulo

  • Brito R (2017) Neo-concretism, apex and rupture of the Brazilian Constructive Project [1975], October (161):89–142

  • Cabral JMN (1995) Obra completa: volume único. Nova Aguilar, Rio de Janiero

  • Calirman C (2012) Brazilian art under dictatorship: Antonio Manuel, Artur Barrio, and Cildo Meireles. Duke UP, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Lygia e Hélio Oiticica e Luciano Figueiredo, org (1998) Cartas 1964–1974. Editora UFRJ, Rio de Janiero

  • Cordeiro W (1964) Arte concreta semântica. In: Arte concreta semâtica (Catálogo da exposição). São Paulo, Galeria Atrium

  • de Campos A (1962) “Cubagrama”, Invencão: Revista de Arte de Vanguarda (2)

  • de Campos H (1966) “Alea 1: Semantic Variations”. El corno emplumado, vol 21. Trans. Edwin Morgan

  • de Campos H (1981) Da razão antropofágica: A Europa sob o signo da devora. Coloquio/Letras 62:10–25

    Google Scholar 

  • de Campos H (1992) Metalinguagem. Editora Perspectiva, Rio de Janeiro

  • de Campos H (1997) Arco-íris branco. Imago, Rio de Janeiro

  • de Campos H (2003) Pequena estética. Editora Perspectiva, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • de Campos H (2007) Novas: selected writings. In: Bessa AS, Cisneros O (eds). Northwestern UP, Chicago

  • de Campos A (2021) “Pergunta sobre Caixa Preta”. Received by Nathaniel Wolfson, June 3, 2021, Email Interview

  • de Campos A, de Campos H, Pignatari D (2006) Teoria da poesia concreta: Textos críticos e manifestos, 1950–1960. SP: Editorial Studio

  • de Souza PLP (1996) ESDI: biografia de uma idéia. Eduerj, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval R (2015) Fondements épistémologiques et préceptes esthétiques de la traductologie d'Haroldo de Campos: l'apport de Max Bense. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Montreal

  • Franklin S (2021) The digitally disposed: racial capitalism and the informatics of value. UMinnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giunta A (2016) Simultaneous abstractions and Postwar Latin American Art. In: Enwezor O, Siegel K, Wilmes U (eds) Postwar: art between the Pacific and the Atlantic: 1945–1965. Prestel, Munich, pp 484–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles K (1999) How we became Posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. UChicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins H, Kahn D (eds) (2012) Mainframe experimentalism: early computing and the foundations of the digital arts. California UP, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee PM (2004) Chronophobia: on time in the art of the 1960s. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Filho L, Hartkopf C (2018) Padrões de intenção no trabalho de Aloísio Magalhães: uma análise do processo de criação do símbolo do IV Centenário do Rio de Janeiro. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/32976. Accessed 1 Nov 2020

  • Medosch A (2016) New tendencies: art at the threshold of the information revolution: 1961–1978. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson A (2012) The monumental and the ephemeral: the São Paulo Bienal and the emergence of abstraction in Brazil, 1946–1954. Doctoral dissertation, New York University

  • Nelson A (2020) Far from good design: social responsibility and Waldemar Cordeiro’s early theory of form. Artelogie [Online], vol 15. http://journals.openedition.org/artelogie/4374. Accessed 15 Nov 2020

  • Neubauer S (2018) Max Bense/Aloísio Magalhães (Alemanha, 1969): o contexto popular e transcultural de ‘Der Weg eines Zeichens.’ ARS 16(32):81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre AL (2012) Design in Brazil: which revolution? Blucher Design Proc 1(1):80–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre AL (2015) Max Bense: intelligence as mobility. In: Paper presented at Philosophy & Architecture International Postgraduate Conference, Faculty of Humanities of the University of Lisbon/Berardo Collection Museum (Lisbon 4–6 November 2015)

  • Perloff M (2010) Unoriginal genius: poetry by other means in the new century. UChicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatari D (1962) “stèle pour vivre 3” Invencão: Revista de Arte de Vanguarda (2):11

  • Price R (2012) Early Brazilian digital culture; or, the woman who was not B.B. Grey Room (47):60–79

  • Ramírez CM (2016) The necessity of concreteness: a view from the (global?) south. In: Enwezor O, Siegel K, Wilmes U (eds) Postwar: art between the pacific and the atlantic: 1945–1965. Prestel, Munich, pp 490–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt J (ed) (1971) Cybernetics, art and ideas. New York Graphic Society, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. UIllinois Press, Urbana

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg E (2016) Art systems: Brazil and the 1970s. UTexas Press, Austin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop R (1976) A basis of concrete poetry. Bucknell Rev 22(2):141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther-Bense E (1996) The relations of Haroldo de Campos to German Concretist Poets, in particular to Max Bense. In: Jackson KD, Vos E, Drucker J (eds) Experimental-visual-concrete: Avant-Garde Poetry since the 1960s. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 353–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel J (2019) Benses Brasilien: Reflexionen zur konkreten Poesie, Brasília und dem Entwurf einer Rheinland-schaft. In: Albrecht A, Bonitz M, Skowronski A, Zittel C (eds) Max Bense Werk-Kontext-Wirkung. Metzler, Frankfurt, pp 291–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson N (2015) A Correspondência entre Haroldo de Campos, Max Bense e Elizabeth [sic] Walther: Uma Primeira Leitura. Circuladô Outros Códigos Revista De Estética e Literatura Do Centro Referência Haroldo De Campos 3(3):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson N (2018a) Qual é o número, leitor-operador? A sobrecarga material na estética de Max Bense segundo Haroldo de Campos. In: J Wrobel (ed) Roteiros de palavras, sons, imagens: Os diálogos transcriativos de Haroldo de Campos. Frankfurt a. M., pp 57–74

  • Wolfson N (2018b) Brazil after history, or two German accounts of postwar Brazilian Literature. German Rev Literature Culture Theory 93(1):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some ideas discussed here were first presented in an earlier book chapter included in Roteiros de palavras, sons, imagens: os diálogos transcriativos de Haroldo de Campos ed. Jasmin Wrobel (2018) and in the conference “Poetry, Criticism, Translation: Haroldo de Campos, an International Conference,” Yale University, 2020, organized by David K Jackson and Eduardo Jorge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Wolfson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolfson, N. After the “new aesthetic”: a short history of the cybernetic turn in Brazil. AI & Soc 37, 1059–1069 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01340-8

Keywords

Navigation