Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The ethics of algorithms from the perspective of the cultural history of consciousness: first look

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories related to cognitive sciences, Human-in-the-loop Cyber-physical systems, data analysis for decision-making, and computational ethics make clear the need to create transdisciplinary learning, research, and application strategies to bring coherence to the paradigm of a truly human-oriented technology. Autonomous objects assume more responsibilities for individual and collective phenomena, they have gradually filtered into routines and require the incorporation of ethical practice into the professions related to the development, modeling, and design of algorithms. To make this possible, it is pertinent and urgent to bring them closer to the problems and approaches of the humanities. Increasingly transdisciplinary research must be part of the construction of systems that provide developers and scientists with the necessary bases to understand the ethical debate and therefore their commitment to society. This article considers two theories as articulating axes: Blumenberg’s, coming from the field of philosophy, for whom the process of technification and especially the implementation of mathematical models in their algorithmic form leads to an emptying of meaning and therefore makes programmers who implement their functions to be alien to the concerns that gave them origin; Daston’s, belonging to the field of the history of science and according to which the division of labor in the processes of technification of the calculation implies a kind of subordination in which those who implement the inventions of a small group of privileged mathematicians ignore the procedures that put them into operation. Given these two theories, the black box models prevalent in AI development, and the urgency of establishing explanatory frameworks for the development of computational ethics, this article exposes the need to give a voice to the cultural history of consciousness for promoting the discussions around the implementation of mathematical algorithms. The paper takes as a reference the different points of view that have emerged around the study of technological ethics, its applicability, management, and design. It criticizes the current state of studies from a humanistic perspective and explains how the historical perspective allows promoting the training of software engineers, developers and creators so that they assume intuitions and moral values in the development of their work. Specifically, it aims to expose how cultural history, applied to the study of consciousness and its phenomena, makes those involved in this technological revolution aware of the effect that they, through their algorithms, have on society in general and on human beings in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananny M (2016) Toward an ethics of algorithms: convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Sci Technol Hum Values 41(1):93–117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43671284

  • Baker-Brunnbauer J (2020) Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics. November 16, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00022-3

  • Batya F, David GH (2019) Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination. The MIT Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bietti E (2019) From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing - A View on Tech Ethics from Within Moral Philosophy. In: Proceedings of ACM FAT* Conference (FAT* 2020). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372860

  • Blumenberg H (2013) Teoría del mundo de la vida. Chapter: Mundo de la vida y tecnificación bajo aspectos de la fenomenología. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica

  • Bostrom N (2017) Strategic implications of opennes in AI Development. Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12403

  • Bostrom N, Eliezer Y (2011) "The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence." In Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Keith Frankish and William Ramsey. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Burke P (2000) Formas de la historia cultural. Alianza, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartier R (2005) El mundo como representación. Estudios sobre historia cultural. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa

  • Chartier R (2007) La historia o la lectura del tiempo. Gedisa, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (2003) Looking for Spinoza: Joy. Harcourt, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (2018) The strange order of things: life, feeling, and the making of cultures. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston L (2017) Calculation and the division of labor, 1750–1950. 31st Annual Lecture of the German Historical Institute, Washington DC, November 9

  • Daugman JG (2001) Brain Metaphor and Brain Theory. En Philosophy and the Neurosciences, Editado por W. Bechtel et al. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

  • De-Arteaga M, Fogliato R, Chouldechova A (2020). A case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores. ACM CHI Conference.

  • Dehaene S (2014) Consciousness and the brain: deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Penguin Random House Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G (1984) La imagen-movimiento – Estudios sobre cine 1. Ediciones Paidós, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-León, Christian; Quintero Montoya, O. L and Ortiz, Yarlin Andrea. "Human centered Mathematics: a framework for medical applications based on Extended Reality (XR) and Artificial Intelligence" Accepted for publication in Frontiers in Neurorobotics. Manuscript ID: 827317

  • Draaisma D (2000) Metaphors of memory: a history of ideas about the mind. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzieza J (2021) How hard will the robots make us work? theverge.com. February 27, 2021

  • Eitel-Porter R (2020) Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI and Ethics, Octuber 6:2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L et al (2018) AI4People – An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds Mach. 28:689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragio A (2016) Metáforas de la subjetividad en la psicología del siglo xix. Roma: Aracne

  • Gabriel M (2020) Moralischer Fortschritt in dunklen Zeiten. Ullstein Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (2005) La interpretación de las culturas. Editorial Gedisa, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff T (2020) The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Minds Mach 30(1):99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari Y (2018) Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassabis D, Christopher S, Matthew B (2017) AI and Neuroscience: A Virtuous Circle. DeepMind Blog, August 2. Accessed February 17, 2021. https://deepmind.com/blog/article/ai-and-neuroscience-virtuous-circle.

  • Hutson M (2021) Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? The New Yorker. February 15, 2021.

  • IEEE (2019) Ethically Aligned Design, First Edition. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

  • Jaume-Palasí L, Spielkamp M (2017) Ethics and algorithmic processes for decision making and decision support. Algorithm Watch Working Paper No. 2, Berlin 2017

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Jhonson M (2001) Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Cátedra, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes JC (2018) Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation. Social Media + Society. April-June 2018:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjarrés Á, Simon P (2021) Aprendizaje-servicio y agenda 2030 en la formación de ingenieros de la tecnología inteligente. Revista Diecisiete. 2021. No 4. Madrid. ISSN 2695–4427 Versión digital (pp 59–82). https://doi.org/10.36852/2695-4427_2021_04.03

  • Mamedova N, Urintsov A, Komleva N, Staroverova O, Fedorov B (2019) Machine learning ethics in the context of justice Intuition. SHS Web of Conferences 69, 00150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900150

  • McNamara A, Smith J, Murphy-Hill E (2018) Does ACM's code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development? In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3264833

  • Morley J, Floridi L, Kinsey L, Anat E (2020) From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices. Sci Eng Ethics 26:2141–2168

  • Moscoso, Javier (2011). Historia cultural del dolor. México: Editorial Taurus.

  • Moscoso J (2017) Promesas incumplidas Una historia política de las pasiones. Editorial Taurus, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport C (2021) E-mail is making us miserable. The New Yorker Februray 26:2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhede SC, Wolfe PJ (2018) The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations. Phil Trans R Soc A 376:20170364. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0364

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M, Stahl BC (2021) Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 19(1):61–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadin É (2013) L’humanité augmentée. L’administration numérique du monde. Paris: L’Echappée

  • Sadin É (2020) L’intelligence artificielle ou l’enjeu du siècle: Anatomie d’un antihumanisme radical. L’Echappée, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar Martínez CA (2021) Papá y el big data. Revista Universidad De Antioquia, (342), 101–103. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/revistaudea/article/view/345619

  • Martínez S, Andrés C (2020) El origen sensorial de la conciencia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Eafit, Medellín; Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky RM (2018) Compórtate: La biología que hay detrás de nuestros mejores y peores comportamientos. Capitán Swing Libros, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Savater F (1991) Ética para Amador. Editorial Ariel, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Siau K, Wang W (2020) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI. Journal of Database Management. Volume 31, Issue 2. April-June 2020:74–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamados, Andreas; Aggarwal, Nikita; Cowls, Josh; Morley, Jessica; Roberts, Huw; Taddeo, Mariarosario; Floridi, Luciano (2020). The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions.

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbrello S (2018) The moral psychology of Value Sensitive Desing: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation. J Respons Innovat 5(2):186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1457401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbrello S, van de Poel I (2021) Mapping value sensitive design onto AI form social good principles. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velden M (2022) Human-like Computers: A Lesson in Absurdity. Schwabe Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yarce-Botero, Andres;.et al, (2022) A Knowledge-Aided Robust Ensemble Kalman filter algorithm for non-linear and non-gaussian large systems. Front Appl Math Stat Sect Dyn Syst. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2022.830116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H et al (2018) Building Ethics into Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18). 5527–5533

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Andres Salazar Martinez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez, C.A.S., Montoya, O.L.Q. The ethics of algorithms from the perspective of the cultural history of consciousness: first look. AI & Soc 38, 763–775 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01475-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01475-2

Keywords

Navigation