Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehension contradicts to the induction within Łukasiewicz predicate logic

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce the simpler and shorter proof of Hajek’s theorem that the mathematical induction on ω implies a contradiction in the set theory with the comprehension principle within Łukasiewicz predicate logic Ł\({\forall}\) (Hajek Arch Math Logic 44(6):763–782, 2005) by extending the proof in (Yatabe Arch Math Logic, accepted) so as to be effective in any linearly ordered MV-algebra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cantini A.: The undecidability of Grisĭn’s set theory. Studia Logica 74, 345–368 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajek P.: On arithmetic in the Cantor-Łukasiewicz fuzzy set theory. Arch. Math. Log. 44(6), 763–82 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Yatabe, S.: Distinguishing non-standard natural numbers in a set theory within Łukasiewicz logic. Arch. Math. Log. (accepted)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunsuke Yatabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yatabe, S. Comprehension contradicts to the induction within Łukasiewicz predicate logic. Arch. Math. Logic 48, 265–268 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-009-0127-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-009-0127-5

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation