Skip to main content
Log in

Reflection and not SCH with overlapping extenders

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use the forcing with overlapping extenders (Gitik in Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality, to appear in JSL) to give a direct construction of a model of \(\lnot \)SCH+Reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This condition basically says that one entree given dense open set by taking a direct extension and then specifying finitely many coordinates. Usually, this property has the same proof, as the Prikry condition and is used to show that \(\bar{\kappa }_\eta ^+\) is preserved in \(V^{\langle \mathcal P,\le \rangle }\).

  2. This is the crucial difference from the long extenders Prikry forcing \(\langle \mathcal P,\le , \le ^*\rangle \) of Section 2 of [3]. The conditions in \(\mathcal P\) consist basically of two parts one of cardinality \(<\kappa _n, (n<\omega )\) (assignment functions) and another of cardinality \(\kappa _\omega \) (Cohen functions). As a result, \(\langle \mathcal P,\le ^*\rangle \) collapses \(\kappa _\omega ^+\) and this allowed Asaf Sharon [9] to build a non-reflecting stationary set. In the present setting both parts are put into one of cardinality \(\kappa _n\).

References

  1. Apter, A.: Laver indestructibility and the class of compact cardinals. J. Symb. Logic 63, 149–157 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Neria, O., Hayut, Y., Unger, S.: Stationary reflection and the failure of SCH

  3. Gitik, M.: Prikry type forcings. In: Foreman, K. (ed.) Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2, pp. 1351–1448. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gitik, M.: Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality (to appear in JSL)

  5. Gitik, M.: An other method for constructing models of not approachability and not SCH

  6. Gitik, M.: An other model with tree property and not SCH

  7. Hayut, Y., Unger, S.: Stationary reflection

  8. Poveda, A., Rinot, A., Sinapova, D.: SIGMA-PRIKRY Forcing I: The Axioms

  9. Sharon, A.: Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moti Gitik.

Additional information

The work was partially supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 1216/18. We are grateful to the referee of the paper for his helpful remarks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gitik, M. Reflection and not SCH with overlapping extenders. Arch. Math. Logic 61, 591–597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-021-00805-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-021-00805-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation