Abstract
We use the forcing with overlapping extenders (Gitik in Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality, to appear in JSL) to give a direct construction of a model of \(\lnot \)SCH+Reflection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This condition basically says that one entree given dense open set by taking a direct extension and then specifying finitely many coordinates. Usually, this property has the same proof, as the Prikry condition and is used to show that \(\bar{\kappa }_\eta ^+\) is preserved in \(V^{\langle \mathcal P,\le \rangle }\).
This is the crucial difference from the long extenders Prikry forcing \(\langle \mathcal P,\le , \le ^*\rangle \) of Section 2 of [3]. The conditions in \(\mathcal P\) consist basically of two parts one of cardinality \(<\kappa _n, (n<\omega )\) (assignment functions) and another of cardinality \(\kappa _\omega \) (Cohen functions). As a result, \(\langle \mathcal P,\le ^*\rangle \) collapses \(\kappa _\omega ^+\) and this allowed Asaf Sharon [9] to build a non-reflecting stationary set. In the present setting both parts are put into one of cardinality \(\kappa _n\).
References
Apter, A.: Laver indestructibility and the class of compact cardinals. J. Symb. Logic 63, 149–157 (1998)
Ben-Neria, O., Hayut, Y., Unger, S.: Stationary reflection and the failure of SCH
Gitik, M.: Prikry type forcings. In: Foreman, K. (ed.) Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2, pp. 1351–1448. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Gitik, M.: Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality (to appear in JSL)
Gitik, M.: An other method for constructing models of not approachability and not SCH
Gitik, M.: An other model with tree property and not SCH
Hayut, Y., Unger, S.: Stationary reflection
Poveda, A., Rinot, A., Sinapova, D.: SIGMA-PRIKRY Forcing I: The Axioms
Sharon, A.: Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work was partially supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 1216/18. We are grateful to the referee of the paper for his helpful remarks.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gitik, M. Reflection and not SCH with overlapping extenders. Arch. Math. Logic 61, 591–597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-021-00805-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-021-00805-3