Skip to main content
Log in

Logic and probabilistic systems

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following some ideas of Roberto Magari, we propose trial and error probabilistic functions, i.e. probability measures on the sentences of arithmetic that evolve in time by trial and error. The set ℐ of the sentences that get limit probability 1 is a Π3—theory, in fact ℐ can be a Π3—complete set. We prove incompleteness results for this setting, by showing for instance that for every k > 0 there are true Π3—sentences that get limit probability less than 1/2k. No set ℐ as above can contain the set of all true Π3—sentences, although we exhibit some ℐ containing all the true Σ2—sentences. We also consider an approach based on the notions of inner probability and outer probability, and we compare this approach with the one based on trial and error probabilistic functions. Although the two approaches are shown to be different, we single out an important case in which they are equivalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billingsley, P.: Probability and Measure. New York: Wiley 1986

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaifman, H., Snir, M.: Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness. J. Symb. Logic 47, 495–548 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gold, E.M.: Limiting recursion. J. Symb. Logic 30, 28–18 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hájek, P.: Experimental logics and Π 03 theories. J. Symb. Logic 42, 515–522 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeroslow, R.G.: Experimental logics and δ 02 theories. J. Philosoph. Logic 4, 253–267 (1975)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jockush, C.G.Jr.: Semirecursive sets and positive reducibility. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 131, 420–436 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Magari, R.: Su certe teorie non enumerabili. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 48, 119–152 (1974)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mostowski, A.: Examples of sets definable by means of two and three quantifiers. Fund. Math. 42, 259–270 (1957)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Putnam, H.: Trial and error predicates and the solution of a problem of mostowski. J. Symb. Logic 30, 49–57 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, H.Jr.: Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. New York: McGraw-Hill 1967

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, D., Krauss, P.: Assigning probabilities to logical formulas. In: Hintikka, J., Suppes, P. (eds) Aspects of inductive logic, pp. 219–264. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1966

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Sorbi.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Roberto Magari

This research was partially supported by MURST and the Human Capital and Mobility network Complexity, Logic and Recursion theory CHRXCT930415. We are greatly indebted to Roberto Magari. He was our teacher and friend. He is the one who suggested to try a probabilistic approach to experimental logics and formal systems in general. Unfortunately we will never know whether or not we worked out his ideas satisfactorily

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montagna, F., Simi, G. & Sorbi, A. Logic and probabilistic systems. Arch. Math. Logic 35, 225–261 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530050043

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530050043

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation